Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Official Skyfall Teaser Trailer

May 21

318 replies to this topic

Poll: The First Trailer for Skyfall (173 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like it?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Does it actually matter whether you like it or not?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Does it make you more or less likely to see the film?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Where do you rank it amongst the "Craig-Era" first trailers?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#271 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 02:50 PM


The man is a troll at best, dealt with these before. They are quite annoying for shore as they cant look and be open minded about Skyfall.


Then I'm happy to be a troll as well. Curious....how have you "dealt" with these before? Being "open minded" about 007 may very well be the eventual downfall of the series. If you read his column, this is exactly what he is getting at. A recipe is a recipe. Sure you can add a little here and there but eventually it's not going to taste like it was originally intended.

I eluded to what Mr. Stanley said a few days ago...he just put it a great deal better than myself. The tosspots may very well outnumber the lemmings here. They just don't have to courage to step forward.

Then again, courage is no match for an unfriendly shoe.


You're seriously going to make or at least insist that I reply? Dear lord.

#272 Shrublands

Shrublands

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4012 posts
  • Location:Conveniently Near the NATO Base

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:01 PM

The tosspots may very well outnumber the lemmings here. They just don't have to courage to step forward.



So when losing an argument, you resort to posting insults. Classy.

#273 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:02 PM


The man is a troll at best, dealt with these before. They are quite annoying for shore as they cant look and be open minded about Skyfall.


Then I'm happy to be a troll as well. Curious....how have you "dealt" with these before? Being "open minded" about 007 may very well be the eventual downfall of the series. If you read his column, this is exactly what he is getting at. A recipe is a recipe. Sure you can add a little here and there but eventually it's not going to taste like it was originally intended.

I eluded to what Mr. Stanley said a few days ago...he just put it a great deal better than myself. The tosspots may very well outnumber the lemmings here. They just don't have to courage to step forward.

Then again, courage is no match for an unfriendly shoe.



Hold your tongue.

#274 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:06 PM



The man is a troll at best, dealt with these before. They are quite annoying for shore as they cant look and be open minded about Skyfall.


Then I'm happy to be a troll as well. Curious....how have you "dealt" with these before? Being "open minded" about 007 may very well be the eventual downfall of the series. If you read his column, this is exactly what he is getting at. A recipe is a recipe. Sure you can add a little here and there but eventually it's not going to taste like it was originally intended.

I eluded to what Mr. Stanley said a few days ago...he just put it a great deal better than myself. The tosspots may very well outnumber the lemmings here. They just don't have to courage to step forward.

Then again, courage is no match for an unfriendly shoe.



Hold your tongue.


What would I do without you Mharkin?

#275 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:12 PM

I shouldn't have posted this now! :P

Well, at least he's in favour of Roger Moore. Anyway...sorry to get this thread off topic.


I too was surprised to see the Turkey shots included on the teaser, but if they were filmed a while before Craig was out there, then stunt shots I suppose had enough time to squeeze on there. Certainly a good selling point, action wise!

#276 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:33 PM

RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness and an overdose of oestrogen.


The trailer for the new Bond movie Skyfall has landed– and it looks rubbish. Sorry, but Bond ain’t Bond unless he’s flying into space with a Russian minx called Tatyana Innerthigh on a deadly mission to kill a fat bald man with a cat.

-Okay, so by his standards, they must cast Dr. Evil, I mean Ernst Stavro Blofield again in order for it to be a true Bond film when this has already been done several times in the older films. Sorry multi-nominated cinematographer Roger Deakins work on Skyfall has not impressed him by his own standards.

The rot set in with the casting of Daniel Craig. Things had been going a little haywire since the late 1980s, when the producers first caved into the non-existent popular demand for political correctness. But being the 1980s, they interpreted that to mean people would like to see beautiful ladies with big chests occasionally firing a gun (Hell, yeah!). Then along came Pierce Brosnan and things returned to their campy natural order. “I thought Christmas only came once a year,” etcetera, etcetera.

-So casting Craig has contributed to what he believe is it's "Downfall". He must be someone who regularly goes on danielcraigisnotbond.com.

But Craig was all wrong for the part and signalled the intention of the moviemakers to turn Bond into Raymond Chandler without the laughs. They fail to pull it off because the pressure to sell theatre tickets means they have to betray their own vision. So, on the one hand we have Bond going to psychiatrists, emoting, feeling pain, getting angry, breaking fingers, pulling out a man’s spleen with his teeth, yada yada. On the other hand, we have him leaping 30 foot chasms, turning cars upside down, or sinking half of Venice. Through it all there’s the mawkish “family” of MI6, headed by Judi “Brave But Fragile” Dench. Bernard Lee’s “M” was a gruff Head Boy. Dench is a prissy school mistress with a crush on one of her pupils – Grazia Magazine’s idea of a strong woman.

-So tickets have a hard time selling because of Craig. Both his films have grossed well over $550 million. 'Nuff said. The fact he's now redirecting himself to Judi Dench proves he just wants his fame and does nothing more than to troll.

As for Craig himself, his body is all wrong. Roger Moore’s body was always that of a slightly overweight middle-aged man with a taste for brandy and cigars. He probably required a stunt double for strenuous walking. Connery, whilst lithe to begin with, was a hairy bread pudding by the early 1970s (hairy everywhere but his head). There’s a scene in Diamonds Are Forever where the delicious Jill St John (who also bedded Henry Kissinger) looks at the naked Connery and says, “Why James, there’s more to you than meets the eye.” Yeah, about 4 stone I’d imagine.
Connery and Moore played their parts in an age when character trumped looks and women were encouraged to find a man attractive well into his seventies. They might have had prostate trouble, but they also had wit and charm. And we, the heterosexual men for whom these movies are made, could watch them and aspire to be them. For the price of a safari jacket, at least.

-Someone tell Daniel Craig he must grow chest hair and that he can no longer work out for Bond films. He can no longer have a lean body type because of the characters military background. Sure who here wouldn't want to be Bond? When Craig's bond isn't hunting down bomb makers and having stairwell fights wit Ugandan terrorists he could be a charm(no joke either).

By contrast, Daniel Craig is the Bond for the Men’s Health Magazine generation – an absurd body that no human being could replicate squeezed into a pair of orange trunks. Gentlemen, Bond has been stolen from us and redesigned to appeal to women. In order to keep the men glued to their seats, the producers throw in lashings of sadistic violence. Without innuendo, Bond has thus become violent feminine pørn. It’s not much fun unless you’re into hard pecs and snapped necks.

-Daniel Craig is in shape not to better himself, he could give a damn if wanted to. He got thin for Cowboys & Aliens because real Cowboys weren't bulky ripped men, they were skinny men who can drink and shoot up your saloon. Once he gets into Bond, he means it by working his [censored] off to get into top shape and to be physically able at his age to do the things he can. It's not hard, but it's not easy to get the body he had. Weather its being very muscular in Casino Royale, slightly thinner and less built in Quantum Of Solace, or lean and toned in Skyfall. There's nothing wrong with taking a man having him appeal to women, women have begun to like this new Bond because of its realism and how it's a real man being thrown into real dangers. To this day, there hasn't been a single blood pack used in shootouts for Bond films. The reason Bond is violent is because of who he is. While his methods are extreme, He saved lives by stopping a terrorist who was planning on taking out an airplane at Miami Airport. Craig's Bond is leaning more towards the way Fleming had envisioned him. Cold blooded, trained killer, spy.

How to rescue the series, if we must? Follow this simple formula.
1) Replace Daniel Craig with a slightly older, arthritic actor with a twinkle in his eye. Frankly, I think Roger Moore could still do it.
-See my previous post about Liam Neeson
2) Think big. Have Bond save the world from a giant death ray on Mars. And make sure the villain goes waaaay over budget on uniforms.
-Sorry, this isn't a Michael Bay film.
3) Give the evil mastermind a strong foreign accent and a parrot.
-An evil pirate in a Woody Allen film? Better cast Vincent Cassel for the part!
4) Don’t forget that beyond all this War on Terror stuff, Britain’s nemesis is always Russia. So lots of blonde women in KGB uniforms.
-I'll make sure to tell Mikey G to order extra crates of blonde wigs.
5) Replace the unfunny John Cleese with Rolf Harris.
-John Cleese was replaced, a little late on that one.
6) More girls, more guns and a piranha tank
-Let's have the entire budget dedicated to that and not focus on plot or character development.

Modern moviemakers increasingly don’t understand what the movies are for. They’re about the creation and nurturing of myth. Folks buy movie tickets to see Johnny Weissmuller swinging through the trees, Raquel Welch fight a pterodactyl, or Beatty and Dunaway evaporate in a hail of bullets. They don’t pay to watch someone else’s idea of what is clever or “zeitgeist defining.” We want magic and mystery. We want invisible cars and Union Jack parachutes. We want Roger Moore. We want the biggest, we want the best, we want Bond. And beyond.

-In that case, I don't go into a movie wanting a Christmas list to be fulfilled with it. I go, forget about all outside business, and get sunken into the film and enjoy it. I haven't walked into a film with low expectations since Fast Five and came out entertained as hell. The biggest, the Best, The Bond we all know and love is coming. November 9th/October 26th.

Aside from this, how about those coffins TheCasinoRoyale?

Edited by x007AceOfSpades, 23 May 2012 - 03:43 PM.


#277 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:39 PM

Brilliantly said! Well done!

Edited by Mharkin, 23 May 2012 - 03:40 PM.


#278 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:40 PM

Thank you, much appreciated.

#279 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:57 PM

Don´t feed the troll, guys...

#280 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:59 PM


Anyone else feel like they are watching a Bourne movie? As with Quantum, I'm not impressed. I understand the producers, as with every Bond, try to incorporate current day issues into the plot...unfortunately I am not into the boring, manufactured politics of the 21st century.


I've never seen a Bourne movie, so I wouldn't know, and don't care. Bourne is like Matt Helm - a flash in the pan, a momentary fad not worthy of being compared to Bond.

I'm not sure what you mean by the "manufactured politics of the 21st century", but I don't think you can blame that on the Bond producers.

It's true that the Bond films have always incorporated "current day issues" in some way. But this has generally been in a vague, thematic capacity:

DN - Space race
FRWL - Cold War
GF - Red China, nuclear weapons
TB - Nuclear weapons, NATO
YOLT - Space race
OHMSS - Agricultural revolution, sexual revolution
DAF - Nuclear disarmament
LALD - Drugs, racial conflict
TMWTGG - Energy crisis
TSWLM - Detente
MR - Space exploration
FYEO - Cold War
OP - Cold War
AVTAK - Computers
TLD - Afghanistan
LTK - South American drug lords
GE - Breakup of the Soviet Union
TND - Mass media
TWINE - Terrorism, oil
DAD - "Axis of Evil", torture, 9/11
CR - Terrorism, poker
QOS - Environmentalism, South American leftism
SF - ?

There's no evidence that Skyfall is any more "ripped from the headlines" than any Bond film of the last thirty years. If anything, it's shaping up to be substantially less inspired by current affairs than the last several films.


Spoiler


IGN has posted their break-down of the teaser trailer. Some spoilers are speculated within the break-down, so beware:

http://ca.ign.com/vi...-teaser-trailer


Spoiler


EDIT

#281 Mooredefinitive

Mooredefinitive

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 7 posts
  • Location:United States

Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:15 PM



The man is a troll at best, dealt with these before. They are quite annoying for shore as they cant look and be open minded about Skyfall.


Then I'm happy to be a troll as well. Curious....how have you "dealt" with these before? Being "open minded" about 007 may very well be the eventual downfall of the series. If you read his column, this is exactly what he is getting at. A recipe is a recipe. Sure you can add a little here and there but eventually it's not going to taste like it was originally intended.

I eluded to what Mr. Stanley said a few days ago...he just put it a great deal better than myself. The tosspots may very well outnumber the lemmings here. They just don't have to courage to step forward.

Then again, courage is no match for an unfriendly shoe.



Hold your tongue.

Alright, I'll bite. I will try my best to "reset" myself with Skyfall. Besides, at the end of the day I think we have a great deal more to gain from being fellow Bond fans than anything else. I'm a skeptic...it's just my nature. It was the same with Quantum. I had my doubts about its authenticity. It wasn't until Bond met up with Mathis in Italy was I a fan of the movie. It also helped that General Medrano reminded me of the Cuban General in the opening sequence of Octopussy. What with his cigar in hand and hefty stature,I knew there was a connection...I knew it was authentic.

I'll always come around to the new movies. These are emotional events for all of us, it's just we each have our own view of what they should be. So Mharkin, if you can learn to live with my eccentricities, I'll be your biggest fan.

#282 Germanlady

Germanlady

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1381 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:51 PM

I cannot - by all means - see, how he is serious. To me, all this sounds like sarcasm, as he points out everything, that was a bit on the wrong side with the films.

#283 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 23 May 2012 - 05:10 PM

I cannot - by all means - see, how he is serious. To me, all this sounds like sarcasm, as he points out everything, that was a bit on the wrong side with the films.

Tim Stanley's articles are intended to inflame people to provoke discussion and disagreement. Don't take him seriously; he's not worth it. :)

#284 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 05:28 PM

Hence why I called him a troll. A US Historian has so much time he likes to write crap articles like that. I'm sorry, it just seems unprofessional and pathetic. I just felt the need to reply to it after the YouTube troll incident last night that went on for several hours. Anyways, I believe this is called "Official Skyfall Teaser Trailer" so lets get back on track.

#285 Ren

Ren

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 39 posts
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 23 May 2012 - 05:55 PM

I find the teaser terrific. It really grows on me with each new viewing.

By the way, has there already been pictures / snippets of the new Q?

#286 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:01 PM

Nothing on Q, which doesn't surprise me. We'll either find out in the next few months close the release of the theatrical trailer or we won't until the film is released.

#287 Gt Munn

Gt Munn

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Location:Lafayette, LA

Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:49 AM

Hey fellas. Hold the spoilers please. Do not mention climatic scenes in particular locations, or a very particular building exploding. Some people want to see the story unfold on the screen. There is a spoiler section for a reason.

#288 b0o0n7d

b0o0n7d

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 16 posts

Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:37 AM

The music piece from the trailer is UNBELIEVABLE!!!! Updated to meet new techno/trance infused music of today's hits. Rumor is Newman is responsible for the piece....I could see Oakenfold lending a helping hand - but his website has no mention of any upcoming 007 work. If anyone has any idea who did this trailer music please let me know. Thanks ;)

#289 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:08 AM

Where have you heard these rumors?

#290 Ren

Ren

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 39 posts
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 24 May 2012 - 06:47 AM

I don't think the teaser music is from Thomas Newman. It's not common; but I may be wrong on this one.

#291 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:04 AM

Sure, we've seen Bond down-and-out before, but this is a far cry from Bond just hopping over to the local yacht club, getting a quick shave, and finding himself immediately back in business.


Agreed. If Casino Royal felt like Bond begins than this seems like The British Knight Rises! Scruffy, older, out of practice...But...I'm so not complaining. Loved every ounce of that trailer....best trailer since..I don't know...god that rules...all Brosnan's trailers except for DAD were damn good but since looks like art on every frame...just beautiful...I'm absolutely mental right now.


We haven't seen Bond so badly out of sorts before, but followers of Bond in print have read about him being in a bad way at the start of You Only Live Twice. Following the murder of his wife, Bond hits the bottle and, we are told, badly bungles certain missions, to the point where M considers him a security risk and has to consider terminating his services.

Then we have the opening of the novel The Man With the Golden Gun. The Skyfall trailer scene showing Bond undergoing psychological tests makes me wonder - have the film makers dipped into TMWTGG the book for Fleming source material?

#292 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:12 AM

Having come across Tim Stanley before, I wouldn't worry too much about his opinions... Not a fan.


Neither am I. Has the writer of this piece seen a Bond film in the last few decades, or was it written on the basis of what he thinks goes into a Bond film, based on what he's read in other articles about Bond films written by columnists who haven't seen a Bond film in the last 20 years either?

("Sack John Cleese" being the dead giveaway - search as hard as you like but you won't find Mr Cleese any of the Craig films ;-) )

#293 luigi007

luigi007

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 13 posts

Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:20 AM

There's some shots at the end of the trailer including Bond jumping onto the train, Bond turning round and firing a gun and the cars falling off the train in front of a jeep. Actually suprised they included them really. Considering they were only filmed a few weeks ago. They must've tweaked the trailer after showing it at the film festival.


Filming that scene in Adana didn't require Craig. My bet is that what we see in the trailer
(that particular scene of the motorcycle - train jump) was filmed at pinewood, to be intertwined later with
wider shots filmed in adana with stuntmen.

#294 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:39 AM

thanks to KlausHergesheimer at mi6 community you can see
Spoiler


#295 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:18 AM


There's some shots at the end of the trailer including Bond jumping onto the train, Bond turning round and firing a gun and the cars falling off the train in front of a jeep. Actually suprised they included them really. Considering they were only filmed a few weeks ago. They must've tweaked the trailer after showing it at the film festival.


Filming that scene in Adana didn't require Craig. My bet is that what we see in the trailer
(that particular scene of the motorcycle - train jump) was filmed at pinewood, to be intertwined later with
wider shots filmed in adana with stuntmen.

That shot from the trailer, plus the one of the motorbike jump onto the train, was shot in Adana by the second unit while the main unit was still back at Pinewood, so it was probably easy enough to drop into the trailer.

#296 Melancholy Productions

Melancholy Productions

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 174 posts
  • Location:Perth, Australia

Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:54 AM

Saw MIB3 today at Event Cinemas in Australia; sadly no Skyfall teaser attached :(

#297 Satorious

Satorious

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 470 posts

Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:48 PM

The music piece from the trailer is UNBELIEVABLE!!!! Updated to meet new techno/trance infused music of today's hits. Rumor is Newman is responsible for the piece....I could see Oakenfold lending a helping hand - but his website has no mention of any upcoming 007 work. If anyone has any idea who did this trailer music please let me know. Thanks ;)


I think this "rumour" is more someone's wishful thinking! It is almost certainly written by some third party specifically for the trailer (ala. Goldeneye/Casino Royale). Newman doesn't start work on the picture until next month I believe. It's also not common these days for a composer to score both the trailer and film together (but not impossible as TND suggests).

Edited by Satorious, 24 May 2012 - 12:50 PM.


#298 Marketto007

Marketto007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2487 posts
  • Location:Brasil

Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:47 PM

thanks to KlausHergesheimer at mi6 community you can see

Spoiler


Here's the image...

http://i1115.photobu...eve_trailer.gif

xxx

#299 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:01 PM

Oooh! Good eye...! Nice work guys.

#300 Emma

Emma

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 636 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:52 PM

I saw the trailer this morning. Looks very promising. Very reminiscent of an episode of MI5.