Well thank you for the very nice compliment (and the very quotable quote), B007GLE.I've been incommuncato (spelling?) for the last few days and was glad to get back online and read this article and my quote.
Thank you Zencat for quoting me and for some great articles: the Benson interview has been so good I've printed them ut and tucked them inside my James Bond Bedside Companion. I expect to go back to that interview over the years.
007 Fans Take Aim at "Young Bond" Concept
#31
Posted 12 April 2004 - 10:43 PM
#32
Posted 12 April 2004 - 10:53 PM
#33
Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:06 AM
Think it'll look anything like this?I'll only buy the books if they have a nice cover. Rather like the John Gardner books in that respect then.
Attached Files
#34
Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:09 AM
That's what I think at least.
#35
Posted 14 April 2004 - 12:10 PM
A good indicator to see if the concept works may be the international market. But I doubt that any foreign publisher will jump on it imediately. They'll all wait how the books sell on the English-speaking matket, and then decide. Unless, of course, the book(s) show to be absolutely fantastic, a sure hit, even for the most narrow-minded accountant. But we'll have to wait and see, too early for that.
Another thing with this idea is, and I'm sure you've all experienced this:
I've got many friends who are not really Bond fans, but always interested in geting some news and to learn what's going on. And of course, I have been asked: "So, tell me, apart from all those rumours, is there any solid and confirmed news on Bond?"
Um... How to explain it to the kids? Just a few explanatory words on the development of the literary Bond and that there will be a new series of books. And then (somewhere out of leftfield, after a short rethorical break): "It's going to be set in the 30's, James Bond will be 13 years old." Bang! I've never seen so many of my friends looking like they had just been hit with a frying pan on the forehead. Typical answer is a classic quote: "You must be joking." The further reactions are just the same as in this forum...
So, what have you all experienced when talking about this to non-Bond Fans? What does the general unbiased public think about it?
#36
Posted 14 April 2004 - 01:04 PM
Although this goes against the feelings of most of us,clearly these books have an appeal to younger readers,I can only hope that given time they will move on and read Flemings books.
#37 Civilian_007 Samurai_*
Posted 14 April 2004 - 03:18 PM
Should these new books be promoting to children a literary character which is aimed at the adult market? James Bond, as Fleming wrote him, is not a children's character. I know the films, at least in the UK, are now 12a - which means that those over 12 can see it un-accompanied, but the under 12s can still see it with an adult. But the films are tamed down versions of the books. I know that some kids might enjoy the films and then go and buy a Fleming books - but I think that this is much more likely to happen if they enjoy Higson books.
In the 21st century, should children be contemplating such 'contradictionary' concepts as a hero that smoke, whilst smoking is a bad thing, and a hero that is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc - whilst discrimination is a bad thing. Many of us may think 'well it was good enough for me as a kid'. But this is the nature of progress, that which we accepted is no longer acceptable - because we hope to live in a world that is changing for the better - without discrimination (and smoking). Most especially in children.
I'm not saying that reading books has a negative effect on anybody, or that books should have an age limit, or even that children can't accept the notion of fiction and characters that are not 'black-and-white, 'good-and-bad'. I just wonder whether IFP have even considered any of this.
#38
Posted 14 April 2004 - 03:22 PM
#39
Posted 14 April 2004 - 09:50 PM
When you are 12 you can read stories about a hero who smoke who have sex, who is homophobic and so...
I am 43 now. I don't smoke, I'm not homophobic I'm not violent, I have sex but only with my wife and I'm still a hard fan.
#40
Posted 14 April 2004 - 09:53 PM
So...
#41
Posted 15 April 2004 - 01:16 PM
I drive cars way too fast
I have been known to imbibe a vodka martini, or two.
I once carried a gun in the car, and wore a shoulder holster
I used to smoke, but quit, due to it being a filthy habit.
I have sex quite often...with my girlfriend.
However, I have never killed anyone before. So, that must be something...
#43
Posted 18 August 2004 - 08:15 PM
Commercially speaking:
Young Indiana Jones worked, although he wasn't a boy.
Young Sherlock Holmes worked.
Spy Kids worked.
Alex Rider worked.
It seems they want to cash in on Potter by creating a new mega popular teen hero, using the Bond brand name. That may or may not work, but it puts a big dent in the already dented credibility of James Bond movies. If they wanted to rachet up the movies to be as commercially successful as Mission Impossible, that isn't the way to do it.
It cheapens the Bond brand name and makes it seem less cool. Frankly, I think they are making a HUGE mistake, even though I suspect these books will be best sellers and may come second in sales to only Harry Potter on the children's lists.
#44
Posted 17 October 2005 - 11:19 PM
A mistake! A disaster! Sure fire bomb! Yadda, yadda. We were dead wrong.
SilverFin will probably be the most successful James Bond continuation novel of them all (if it isn't already). Maybe the best position here would have been just to "wait for the book."
Sometimes those in charge actually know what they are doing. Sometimes.
#45
Posted 17 October 2005 - 11:31 PM
Reading my above comment from over a year ago...
I'll get me coat...
#46
Posted 17 October 2005 - 11:33 PM