Was there anything good about Moonraker?
#31
Posted 20 May 2003 - 09:15 PM
When I was about nine, I had a complicated orthodontial appliance that consisted of a metal plate in my upper palate, strictly for the purpose of widening my extremely narrow jaw. Every night my mom had to stick a key in there and crank it open a few more notches. Not suprisingly, it made eating difficult and I had a bit of a speech impediment during those years. One day, Dad and I saw a bit of MR on T.V., and ever since he's called me "Jaws". I've long since had the thing taken out, but the name stuck.
And that, my friends, is the only good thing about Moonraker. Except for the song, which is so sickly sweet that you love to hate it.
As a nine-year-old, the movie insulted my intelligence. I'm a little leery of trying it again.
#32
Posted 23 May 2003 - 01:17 AM
#33
Posted 26 May 2003 - 11:57 PM
I liked it until the part when they played the cheesy love song between Jaws and the little blond girl, MR's title sequence was more entertaining than TLD's (TLD's was too slow for the song). I agree with those who say that Bond should stay on Earth. My favoite part is the fight scene in the glass museum (It sort of reminds me of a certain music video), My brother loved it though (he liked the lasers), I would have to say that I liked how they explained the special nerve gas also. Bond's boat was nice looking in the river chase too
#34
Posted 23 December 2008 - 12:56 AM
Moonraker is indeed good all up until the space station is revealed which is after Bond's fight with the python.
#35
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:23 AM
Moonraker is indeed good all up until the space station is revealed which is after Bond's fight with the python.
Moonraker is indeed good all up until the space station is revealed which is after Bond's fight with the python.
Did you seriously just revive a FIVE and a half year old thread?
#36
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:42 AM
then
*tries to muster a voice only Roger Moore could pull*
"Must have been another chap."
To answer your question, yes I did. I just viewed Moonraker for the first time today and would like to hear some other people's opinions on the film. That okay with you?
#37
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:00 AM
Just my own reason, mind.
Being a bigger fan of the Fleming novels than the films on the whole, I had a lot of vitriol for the way that the wonderful story that Fleming wrote was abandoned for a retread of a retread and made the film just about as un-Flemingesque as it could ever be.
However, being that there are plenty of things in life that are more important than Bond, I've gained some perspective on it. They were going for an iconic, stylish romp, and in doing so they succeeded brilliantly.
Also, I've found Roger Moore to be one of the more admirable actors I've ever seen and have quite a lot of respect for him. He loved playing Bond and it shows. Much as he's not Fleming's Bond, he's fantastic at what he's going for. Anyone who tells you he's not a good actor hasn't studied the craft very hard IMO.
MR used to rank #21 (when there were only 21 EON films), but it's a little higher now. Probably in the 15-20 range. Don't get me wrong, it's still got some real groaner moments, but it never takes itself so seriously that the groaners are a big deal. Hope you enjoyed it.
#38
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:11 AM
The music, dialogue, sets and villain are all great. Because I like the first three quarters, I've managed to overlook the sheer absurdity of the space scenes and put it down to escapist fantasy. With Moore, going into space, armed with laser guns mind you, is quite fine. It's on another level of fantasy and we expect it to be. That's why it's so enjoyable.
#39
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:27 AM
#40
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 AM
I'm not a huge fan of Moonraker, but it does have, IMO, the best pre-title sequence in the series, so that counts for something. Also, it's got Roger Moore, who was always good as Bond. It wasn't that bad up until Bond went into space, but that was where the film really fell apart on itself.
Yeah, I remember hearing about MOONRAKER'S disreputable rep and finally watched it. I rememeber watching the Venice and Brazil sequences (and, yes, that PTS) and thinking, "Well, this isn't so bad."
And then they went into SPACE, which I was hoping was an exaggeration or an urban myth. At which point I vomited.
#41
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:39 AM
And then they went into SPACE, which I was hoping was an exaggeration or an urban myth. At which point I vomited.
If they had made a few changes to the main body of the film, and then stopped the film just before Bond goes to space, MR could have been a great Bond film. It's amazing just how wrong everything went once Bond left the planet, though.
#42
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:53 AM
it almost makes up for the whole space sequence that came before it but not quite.
#43
Posted 23 December 2008 - 04:48 AM
#44
Posted 23 December 2008 - 07:55 AM
#45
Posted 23 December 2008 - 08:01 AM
A woman is torn apart by hungry dogs.
A man is cut open with piano wire.
A man plans a universal holocaust by gassing everyone on earth and starting a master race, forty years after the start of WW2. How they got away with this plot idea is anyone's guess.
Spectacular dialogue for the villain.
Unashamed spectacle and sound and putting oddles of lovely money right up there on screen. It still looks pretty damn good and damn good pretty.
Moonraker is really, really nasty. And jolly good because of it. Leave it be.
#46
Posted 23 December 2008 - 08:02 AM
#47
Posted 23 December 2008 - 09:50 AM
#48
Posted 23 December 2008 - 11:10 AM
#49
Posted 23 December 2008 - 11:31 AM
I like Moonraker. For me, along with The Spy Who Loved Me, it's Moore at his peak.
The music, dialogue, sets and villain are all great. Because I like the first three quarters, I've managed to overlook the sheer absurdity of the space scenes and put it down to escapist fantasy. With Moore, going into space, armed with laser guns mind you, is quite fine. It's on another level of fantasy and we expect it to be. That's why it's so enjoyable.
I completely agree Sharpshooter. Moonraker is a classic, one of Moore's best. I can overlook the space scenes just because of the brilliant, entertaining scenes before hand. I may watch it today actually.
#50
Posted 23 December 2008 - 11:42 AM
#51
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:19 PM
#52
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:30 PM
#53
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:31 PM
#54
Posted 23 December 2008 - 02:19 PM
Drax
Roger on top form as Bond
PTS
Cinematography and Beautiful look to the film
Locations(Venice, Rio)
Epic scope
Fun
Fantasy OTT element
Extremely enjoyable Entertainment. And a guilty pleasure.
Looks and is expensive and all the money is on screen.
Probably missed a few things out. But always enjoy the OTT action scenes and always laugh at some elements of the film more and more.
And a great Bond film(for me, although I am probably in the minority in this opinion). If, of course you take it for what is, and that it is not Fleming in any shape or form and very silly(in a very knowing way) and camp. And it helps if you turn off the DVD after 1 hr 30 mins and avoid the space scenes
I've loved Moonraker ever since I was a little nipper
Edited by BoogieBond, 23 December 2008 - 02:22 PM.
#55
Posted 25 December 2008 - 05:49 AM
I watched Moonraker last night, and was reminded of Ken Adam’s Bond genius. That futuristic room at Drax’s Aztec lair with table in the centre that shrinks into the shuttle blast pit is magnificent.Barry's Score and Ken Adam's sets
#56
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:35 AM
#57
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:18 PM
-Roger Moore is in top form! Sometimes a bit to light, but a really fine peformance.
-Great atmosphere at some moments.
-A nice score from Barry.
-The cinematography
-The brilliant PTS!
-Lois Chiles is a great Bond girl!
-I don't think the outher space scenes are THAT bad.
Altrough a lot of things in the movie could have been much better. The boat chase in Venice is truly ridiculous and it's like Jaws, which was a memorable character in the TSWLM, is just only in the movie for the fun. But it is a bit underrated.
#58
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:27 PM
Edited by MrKidd, 25 December 2008 - 07:35 PM.
#59
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:32 PM
#60
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:35 PM
