
Rosamund Pike bares all!!!
#1
Posted 07 April 2003 - 03:11 PM
She is appearing in "Hitchcock Blonde" at London's Royal Court Theatre.
#2
Posted 07 April 2003 - 03:17 PM
#3
Posted 07 April 2003 - 03:20 PM

#4
Posted 07 April 2003 - 06:37 PM

#5
Posted 07 April 2003 - 07:09 PM
#6
Posted 07 April 2003 - 07:12 PM

#7
Posted 07 April 2003 - 07:33 PM
My website is www.mkkbb.f9.co.uk
You'll have to paste the URL together as I don't want Blue Eyes or anyone else getting into trouble.
P.S. My website is old, I haven't touched it since before World War II.
#8
Posted 07 April 2003 - 07:37 PM
#9
Posted 07 April 2003 - 08:30 PM
#10
Posted 07 April 2003 - 08:36 PM
Just checking to confirm the operation...
#11
Posted 07 April 2003 - 08:40 PM
#12
Posted 07 April 2003 - 09:41 PM
#13
Posted 08 April 2003 - 12:17 AM

#14
Posted 08 April 2003 - 03:45 PM
#15
Posted 08 April 2003 - 03:49 PM
#16
Posted 08 April 2003 - 07:02 PM
#17
Posted 08 April 2003 - 10:49 PM
#18
Posted 09 April 2003 - 03:30 AM
#19
Posted 09 April 2003 - 10:19 AM
#20
Posted 09 April 2003 - 11:22 AM
#21
Posted 09 April 2003 - 03:01 PM
#22
Posted 20 September 2003 - 12:46 AM
Originally posted by ChandlerBing
Is she really blond? I mean, if the collars and cuffs match....
Cuffs?

#23
Posted 20 September 2003 - 03:13 AM
#24
Posted 20 September 2003 - 03:16 AM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
Personally speaking I think she is ugly...
I wouldn't call her ugly, but she isn't the most beautiful woman to ever take her clothes off. She looks far too thin, compared to how she looked in DAD.
#25
Posted 22 September 2003 - 05:43 AM
#26
Posted 22 September 2003 - 10:07 AM
Why bother publishing a lousy, grainy, low rez pic of someone that could really be anyone.
I may be a prude, or not that desperate.
Or both.
#27
Posted 22 September 2003 - 12:36 PM
Originally posted by Blofeld's Cat
Sorry, I don't get it.
Why bother publishing a lousy, grainy, low rez pic of someone that could really be anyone.
I may be a prude, or not that desperate.
Or both.
The fact that shes a Bond girl and can be seen in the flesh for twenty pounds makes it most newsworthy in this day and age. Kenneth Branagh is appearing equally disrobed in Mamet's "Edmond" if anyone would prefer that. Wonder if Tim will be taking the plunge.
#28
Posted 22 September 2003 - 12:40 PM
Originally posted by Blofeld's Cat
Sorry, I don't get it.
Why bother publishing a lousy, grainy, low rez pic of someone that could really be anyone.
I may be a prude, or not that desperate.
Or both.
I agree with you Brett
#29
Posted 23 September 2003 - 02:53 AM
True, but can you actually tell if the pic is really of Rosamund Pike? And, is the newspaper advertising her play by telling everyone to go and see her in the flesh, so to speak?Originally posted by mattbowyer
The fact that shes a Bond girl and can be seen in the flesh for twenty pounds makes it most newsworthy in this day and age.
I'm not saying it's not newsworthy, but something more substantial is required if such a revealing pic is to be published.
#30
Posted 23 September 2003 - 05:27 PM