schwarzeneger as a bond bad guy
#1
Posted 04 April 2003 - 06:06 PM
#2
Posted 04 April 2003 - 06:33 PM
they will NEVER have a villian portrayed by an actor with a name as big/bigger than the chap portaying bond.
plus theres no way theyll spend 25 percent of the budget for a bond film on 2 actors
#3
Posted 04 April 2003 - 06:37 PM
#4
Posted 04 April 2003 - 06:42 PM
guntram shatterhand.
name of movie:
SHATTERHAND
nevermind...it would be considerer a rip-off of Dr No/Tee Hee, not to mention too close to T2
#5
Posted 04 April 2003 - 07:38 PM
Originally posted by ray t
ummm...no.
they will NEVER have a villian portrayed by an actor with a name as big/bigger than the chap portaying bond.
plus theres no way theyll spend 25 percent of the budget for a bond film on 2 actors
Agreed.
Schwarzenegger really shouldn't play second fiddle to anyone. I never really bought into him as the bad guy in Batman Returns Again. Bad guys always have loads to say and Mr S is best when he has little to say.
#6
Posted 04 April 2003 - 10:20 PM
#7
Posted 04 April 2003 - 11:11 PM
#8
Posted 05 April 2003 - 05:35 PM
#9
Posted 05 April 2003 - 10:10 PM
#10
Posted 06 April 2003 - 05:02 AM
#11
Posted 14 April 2003 - 07:46 PM
"Goodbye, Mist-er Bund!"
Arnold would be lots of fun too, he has the humor and can play sinister if he wants. Say if he was a former East German Stasi officer whose running a sort of Club Fled for ousted dictators. He acquires their wealth and weapons then eliminates the dictator or turns him into the UN for trial. Of course he has a plot for world domination all tied up into this.
I think that the major barrier to Arnold playing a Bond villian is not his billing or his acting ability. It's the fact that Arnold get's twenty million a picture. I can't see EON spending that kind of cash for a villian.
#12
Posted 16 April 2003 - 12:52 PM
#13
Posted 16 April 2003 - 02:50 PM
And I'm sure he'd want top billing too, like what he did with Batman And Robin (sorry, don't mean to swear). Almost relagated Clooney to thrid/fourth billing. And he was playing Batman.
No way, there must be someone similar to him, foriegn, big, some acting ability, but unknown who can play a henchman.
#14
Posted 17 April 2003 - 05:47 PM
Originally posted by BONDFINESSE 007
gotta admit it would be very cool to do though
No I don't.
I agree with what the others are saying- too costly, not a good enough actor (I like him in comedies but that's about it), would end up unintentionally funny, bigger star than Brosnan. Plus if it's a muscleman who can "hand Bond his butt" that you want, there are plenty of those out there who are unknowns and would do it for a reasonable price.
Won't happen.
Dave
#15
Posted 10 May 2003 - 09:26 AM
joke only. (for sylvester's fans)
#16
Posted 10 May 2003 - 10:55 PM
still would not mind seeing it;)Originally posted by rubixcub
No I don't.
I agree with what the others are saying- too costly, not a good enough actor (I like him in comedies but that's about it), would end up unintentionally funny, bigger star than Brosnan. Plus if it's a muscleman who can "hand Bond his butt" that you want, there are plenty of those out there who are unknowns and would do it for a reasonable price.
Won't happen.
Dave
#17
Posted 10 May 2003 - 10:59 PM
#18
Posted 11 May 2003 - 10:32 PM
#19
Posted 12 May 2003 - 01:28 AM