37 replies to this topic

[YOLT]

If 2007 is important so is 2012, 50 years of Bond. I think here is the solution:

Bond 21 in 2004 Brosnan
Bond 22 in 2007 Brosnans last
Bond 23 in 2009 winter new actor
Bond 24 in 2011 summer
Bond 25 in 2012 winter

So between 23 24 and 25 there will be 1,5 years it can be a trilogy. And the new actor wont be Brosnan wanting 3 year break( I like Brosnan dont get it wrong)

[Scottlee]

I don't think you're ever going to see another Bond film come out just 18 months after the previous one.

Here's my guess

Brosnan's final film - 2004
New actor in place for his first film - 2007
New actor film #2 - 2009
New actor film #3 - 2012 (with EON having spent 3 years building up steam for a high quality 50th anniversary Bond film)

Btw - Wasn't it a major shame we didn't get a 30th anniversary film in 1992? Was TLD seen as a 25th anniversary film at the time it came out. I can't remember the media coverage that far back.

[M_Balje]

Originally posted by M_Balje


I agree a litle about that but on an other way,like i say in my Bond 23 & Bond 24 in 2010 Thread.
I Repeat it here with the Brosnan era to.

There are 2 options,i begin with my prefer.
 
Bond 21 November or December 2005 With Brosnan as 007
Bond 22 November or December 2007 With Brosnan as 007

Bond 23&24 in 2010 with an New Bond:
Make one story that you can yust for 2 bond movie's.
You start's in February 2008 writing that story.
At the end of Augustus 2008 Must start's the production of the 2 movie's.
One crue filmd the shots of Bond 23 and Some shots of Bond 24 an other crue. (With an litle bit more for Bond 23)

At the end of February 2010 must play part one (Bond 23) play in the Cinema.
One weak for christmis 2010 must play part two (Bond 24) play in the cinema.

Second option:

Bond 21 December 2004 With Brosnan as 007
Bond 22 December 2006 With Brosnan as 007

Bond 23&24 in 2009 with an New Bond:
Make one story that you can yust for 2 bond movie's.
You start's in February 2007 writing that story.
At the end of Augustus 2007 Must start's the production of the 2 movie's.
One crue filmd the shots of Bond 23 and Some shots of Bond 24 an other crue. (With an litle bit more for Bond 23)

At the end of February 2009 must play part one (Bond 23) play in the Cinema.
One weak for christmis 2009 must play part two (Bond 24) play in the cinema.

For the third movie of the new 007 (Bond 25) there must it show 3 years after Bond 24.

There is now an new number one option avaible with the December 2004 remour:

Bond 21 December 2004 With Brosnan as 007
Bond 22 November or December 2007 With Brosnan as 007

Bond 23&24 in 2010 with an New Bond:
Make one story that you can yust for 2 bond movie's.
You start's in February 2008 writing that story.
At the end of Augustus 2008 Must start's the production of the 2 movie's.
One crue filmd the shots of Bond 23 and Some shots of Bond 24 an other crue. (With an litle bit more for Bond 23)

At the end of February 2010 must play part one (Bond 23) play in the Cinema.
One weak for christmis 2010 must play part two (Bond 24) play in the cinema.

[gkgyver]

I say: keep the 2007 idea!
What pretends MGM from announcing a new Bond in 2007 instead of 2008?
Wouldn't it be perfect if Pierce would pass the role to the new actor face to face right at the premiere of Bond 22 in 2007?

[Simon]

Originally posted by Scottlee
Was TLD seen as a 25th anniversary film at the time it came out. I can't remember the media coverage that far back.

The Premiere Brochure made a big splash about the 25th aspect. I can't remember there being much else.

[kevrichardson]

Originally posted by Simon

The Premiere Brochure made a big splash about the 25th aspect.  I can't remember there being much else.

There was the usual Television stuff . recall a ABC special hosted by Roger Moore . Which acted as a platform to introduce a new James Bond ( then Timothy Dalton) . A few magazine article one in GQ , with Dalton on the cover . It was not that big of a thing then . I might be wrong but there may have been a film retrospective at the MOMA . With Broccoli in attendence .

[YOLT]

The new actor MUST do something really Big if he wants to be Bond after Brosnan. 2012 is the 50th year of Bond so a trilogy will make it bigger and greater. 1,5 years isnt that small if you think. The new actor will spend his 4 years(2008-2012) just for Bond. 007 deserves it and his new slave:) is going to do it.

50 years, 25 films( not 24 ) in the third movie of the trilogy in 2012.

[Joe Siegler]

I've got a better idea, although totally unworkable these days, I'm sure..

Go back to the release schedule from Dr. No through Thunderball.