Which author would you most like to take over from Raymond Benson?
#1
Posted 24 February 2003 - 03:39 AM
So who would you choose?
Here's my choice: PAUL THEROUX.
#2
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:18 AM
For some reason, I'd like to see Stephen King do a Bond book. I think he would only do one, but I think he would do something very interesting. What about Clive Barker? I know these are horror guys, but somehow I think they'd be able to pull off a Bond.
#3
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:26 AM
The writer that I would pick is Lee Child, a brilliant British mystery writer who has a detective character named Jack Reacher (an American, oddly enough).
#4
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:34 AM
And it if worked, follow on with that formula -- a star author per book. Dick Francis does a Bond horse racing adventure. Michael Crition does a high-concept Bond of some type. Every book would be an event. And I bet IFP could get these guys to write on percentage only. You know they all read and were probably influenced by Fleming when they were young, and would find it fun to do a Bond.
If I were IFP I'd be seeking out these mega a-list authors and pitching them hard on this idea. THIS would reenergize the literary Bond for sure.
#5
Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:02 AM
#6
Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:11 AM
Whoops. I think he died recently, didn't he? Well, that would definitely make news if he did a Bond book then.Originally posted by zencat
...Dick Francis does a Bond horse racing adventure...
Yes, Clive Cussler could join my all star line-up idea.
#7
Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:13 AM
#8
Posted 24 February 2003 - 06:20 AM
Hmm, remake the You Only Live Twice novel and call it Shatterhand or Garden Of Death. But set in Maine.Originally posted by zencat
Yep, the more I think about it the more I think Stephen King should do the next Bond book. I think imagination and a sense of what's authentically macabre is a requirement. Imagine the villain he'd come up with? The settings? And the situations Bond would find himself in? It would be amazing.
Archer, I think, would be a good choice because I think he'd really want to do at least one.
#9
Posted 24 February 2003 - 08:00 AM
I'm not sure Dick Francis is dead, but he might have retired.
I'm pretty sure Gerald Seymour is dead which is a pity because he would have been fine.
Ken Follett?
#10
Posted 24 February 2003 - 08:01 AM
Originally posted by Jim
Another thought - it's not so much the wirters as their agents one has to get through to - and any lengthy contracts one would have to renegotiate around. Look for someone who doesn't have a current book deal/publisher.
#11
Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:23 PM
Another thought - it's not so much the wirters as their agents one has to get through to - and any lengthy contracts one would have to renegotiate around. Look for someone who doesn't have a current book deal/publisher.
I remind you, Jim, that we're supposed to be playing "let's pretend" here. The object is to find out who we'd most like to be hired to write Bond, not to discuss who's likely to land the "gig" and who isn't. The concept of "being realistic" has already been shown the door here; as I put it in my first post on this thread: "Money's no object, and you can pick any writer in the world regardless of how much he or she would cost (I'm sure the reality would be very different for IFP, but let's all just make believe here)."
zencat, Stephen King is a terrific suggestion, and one that I was about to put forward myself before settling on Paul Theroux. I still stand by my choice of Theroux - how many novelists in the world have travelled more and describe exotic locations better? Theroux can write thriller plots, sex, knows England and the English extremely well, etc. etc. Read "Kowloon Tong" to understand why I feel he'd be top of my wish list for Bond.
Jim, Ken Follett is another fine suggestion.
Graham Greene - why did he have to die? Anthony Burgess might also have been good, although he might well have come up with something that was one part purer-Fleming-than-Fleming-himself to two parts esoteric, self-indulgent balderdash.
As for Jeffrey Archer, well, at least one could say that he's "personally researched" a number of the less savoury aspects of Bond's life: imprisonment, call girls, criminal schemes.... All he'd need to do is round up another writing team, and he's good to go. No doubt his Bond would live in a swish penthouse flat with a staggering view of London, where he'd live on shepherd's pie and Krug. He'd also be an Oxford graduate (although he'd insist that his First in Oriental Languages at Cambridge was also genuine) and former running champion. "In his student days, Bond had briefly managed a quartet of scruffy Liverpudlian youths who'd formed a band. Later they went on to achieve a measure of fame as The Beatles, although Bond had told them that he felt ear muffs were essential to appreciation of their raucous 'rock' songs."
Not sure how Archer is perceived in the US, but in the UK the mere mention of his name is enough to elicit a snort of derisive laughter from practically anyone.
#12
Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:33 PM
Originally posted by zencat
Yep, the more I think about it the more I think Stephen King should do the next Bond book. I think imagination and a sense of what's authentically macabre is a requirement. Imagine the villain he'd come up with? The settings? And the situations Bond would find himself in? It would be amazing. And he's an incredible writer. Also, if Stephen Kind did a Bond it would get MAJOR attention and a HUGE printing. A Bond book would be a bestseller again.
And it if worked, follow on with that formula -- a star author per book. Dick Francis does a Bond horse racing adventure. Michael Crition does a high-concept Bond of some type. Every book would be an event. And I bet IFP could get these guys to write on percentage only. You know they all read and were probably influenced by Fleming when they were young, and would find it fun to do a Bond.
If I were IFP I'd be seeking out these mega a-list authors and pitching them hard on this idea. THIS would reenergize the literary Bond for sure.
Terrific idea. And so simple.
Wonder if the thought has ever crossed the minds of the people that makes these decisions...
[dark]
#13
Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:39 PM
Bit of a laughing stock, is he? Is that because he was a pompous "polly" more than anything else?Originally posted by Loomis
Not sure how Archer is perceived in the US, but in the UK the mere mention of his name is enough to elicit a snort of derisive laughter from practically anyone.
With his notoriety, I'd thought he may have acheived a certain amount of a poularity boost, much in the same way that Hugh Grant garnered.
#14
Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:50 PM
#15
Posted 24 February 2003 - 12:52 PM
Originally posted by Blofeld's Cat
Bit of a laughing stock, is he? Is that because he was a pompous "polly" more than anything else?
With his notoriety, I'd thought he may have acheived a certain amount of a poularity boost, much in the same way that Hugh Grant garnered.
Well, no doubt his name would attract a great deal of publicity for any Bond book he wr----, er, had something to do with.
Admittedly, when Archer came to grief a lot of Brits simply exulted in the humiliation of yet another prominent Tory. Still, suggesting Archer's involvement in something would be, for many in this country, at least, akin to putting forward, say, Bill Clinton as head of a commission of inquiry into sexual abuse, or wondering how come O.J. Simpson doesn't seem to make movies any more.
Throughout Archer's life, virtually everything he touched turned into a criminal investigation. This is the man fond of saying things like "It's down that corridor, on the left-hand side past the Picasso" (to a guest asking directions to the lavatory in his flat), and "Oh, about
#16
Posted 24 February 2003 - 01:06 PM
Clive Cussler has a sucessful literary creation why would he risk his fan base on Bond .Originally posted by JackChase007
If Cussler gives it a crack, then I'd be satisfied...
#17
Posted 24 February 2003 - 02:11 PM
Originally posted by zencat (edited)
...And it if worked, follow on with that formula -- a star author per book. Dick Francis does a Bond horse racing adventure. Michael Crition does a high-concept Bond of some type. Every book would be an event. And I bet IFP could get these guys to write on percentage only. You know they all read and were probably influenced by Fleming when they were young, and would find it fun to do a Bond.
If I were IFP I'd be seeking out these mega a-list authors and pitching them hard on this idea. THIS would reenergize the literary Bond for sure.
I really love this idea. The only thing I would add/change to it is that I would add a series editor who really, really knows Bond to work with the authors at various stages of their books to provide and continue a continuity in the series.
#18
Posted 24 February 2003 - 02:26 PM
#19
Posted 24 February 2003 - 02:53 PM
#20
Posted 24 February 2003 - 03:44 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
Clive Cussler has a sucessful literary creation why would he risk his fan base on Bond .
Kev, if you'd read my first post, above that one, you'll see that I ALREADY POINTED THAT OUT. Not to mention, this is just a big "What If"...
I don't know why, but it seems like when I post a lot of things, you just have the need to antagonize me...
#21
Posted 24 February 2003 - 03:56 PM
As the starter of this thread, I'd like to point out - once again - that WE NEEDN'T CONCERN OURSELVES WITH "REALISTIC" CHOICES HERE, BUT ONLY WITH WHO WE'D LIKE TO WRITE BOND! WE'RE JUST PLAYING "WHAT IF" AND ALL PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS DO NOT APPLY!!!!!!!!
#22
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:08 PM
I'm sorry, I'm just feeling troublesome today. Ignore me and I'll go away.
#23
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:20 PM
#24
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:23 PM
#25
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:24 PM
#26
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:44 PM
James Patterson would be good too in terms of story and pacing, although his standard of prose writing and characterisation probably isn't high enough.
Ah, what the hell... I'd hire myself to write the next book
#27
Posted 24 February 2003 - 04:51 PM
That what my ex-wife said about are marriage. Thanks . More to the point as allways you are right.Originally posted by JackChase007
Kev, if you'd read my first post, above that one, you'll see that I ALREADY POINTED THAT OUT. Not to mention, this is just a big "What If"...
I don't know why, but it seems like when I post a lot of things, you just have the need to antagonize me...
#28
Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:21 PM
I don't know whether Forsyth has given up fiction, but he seems to spend a lot of time writing angry and Blimpish letters to the British right wing newspaper The Daily Telegraph (Torygraph).
Some more suggestions: Martin Amis; J.G. Ballard; Bryan Forbes (British film director and novelist - has written spy fiction among other things, including the excellent "The Endless Game" and its sequel "A Song at Twilight"); William Goldman (legendary Hollywood screenwriter - novels include "Marathon Man"); Jerzy Kosinski (the superb spy novel "Cockpit" - Kosinski committed suicide in 1991, and for all I know some of these other guys are dead, but, hey, we're playing "what if?" here); Ian McEwan; David Morrell (created Rambo in his thriller "First Blood"); Trevanian ("The Eiger Sanction", "Shibumi"); Eric Van Lustbader ("The Ninja" and its sequels).
Oh, and Enid Blyton. Now THERE was a writer!
#29
Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:29 PM
Thank you dark. I think most people in charge might dismiss the idea as being impossible or too expensive, but I think they might be very surprised if they approached some of these superstar writers. I bet all these writers, at one point or another, have had an idea for a Bond book and would love to do one just for the fun. Writers love to write, and for guys used to writing massive 500 page tomes, a nice tight 290page Bond adventure would be like a vacation for them. I'll bet you anything they would do it for no cash up front, only a percentage of sales. I think IFP should seriously consider this idea.Originally posted by [dark]
Terrific idea. And so simple.
Wonder if the thought has ever crossed the minds of the people that makes these decisions...
(I just emailed IFP this idea.)
#30
Posted 24 February 2003 - 11:59 PM
He's not a super-author, but he's well-known for his writing so it's a good balance for Bond, and is someone who may not necessarily command an exorbitant salary.