where is the miami vice scene?
#1
Posted 09 February 2003 - 06:35 AM
#2
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:10 AM
#3
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:13 AM
#4
Posted 09 February 2003 - 08:50 AM
#5
Posted 09 February 2003 - 09:26 AM
#6
Posted 09 February 2003 - 04:23 PM
I would have been funny in the film, but lets remeber that this isn't a Moore film and people over 10 will want to watch it for more than a laugh
#7
Posted 09 February 2003 - 06:57 PM
Pity more people over 10 did'nt go and watch it then
#8
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:05 PM
#9
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:08 PM
#10
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:44 PM
Besides, they'd have to pay the rights fees to use those characters, they couldn't just throw them in on a whim. I could see them negitiating the rights to "borrow" those characters for a Roger Moore film, but not for a Dalton film.
LTK is a serious movie, with multi-layered subtext - there wouldn't have been any place for such silliness in a movie like that. No way would Michael Wilson go that route in this movie.
#11
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:48 PM
Originally posted by B5Erik2
I've never heard of this, or - more importantly - read about this. I'd be willing to bet good money that it's just another B.S. internet rumor.
Of course it is. It's utter rubbish. Although both Robert Davi and Benicio Del Toro appeared on "Miami Vice".
#12
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:48 PM
Licence To Kill is serious? Your kidding right, I always thought it was one of the most funny Bond movies.
#13
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:50 PM
Originally posted by B5Erik2
LTK is a serious movie, with multi-layered subtext - there wouldn't have been any place for such silliness in a movie like that.
Strange that that didn't preclude someone swinging a swordfish in a bar fight, a skeleton showing up when a photograph is X-rayed, and a winking stone fish.
#14
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:51 PM
#15
Posted 09 February 2003 - 07:57 PM
The swordfish and the skeleton/X-Ray picture fit in under the circumstances of the film without being too jarring, having Crockett & Tubbs would have brought LTK down to the level of Moonraker when you had Jaws saying, "Here's looking at you," to that girl.
#16
Posted 09 February 2003 - 08:13 PM
#17
Posted 09 February 2003 - 08:15 PM
Excellent statement, there are no "Miami Vice" scenes in LTK. It is just a very "Gritty" James Bond film.Originally posted by Dr Noah
"LTK is a serious movie, with multi-layered subtext "
Licence To Kill is serious? Your kidding right, I always thought it was one of the most funny Bond movies.
#18
Posted 25 February 2003 - 07:44 PM
#19
Posted 25 February 2003 - 08:36 PM
I would debate that ! "LTK" was the forerunner of the Brosnan Bond. A return to the serious gritty , violent films like "Dr.No" , "FRWL" , "OHMSS" . Far removed from the Moore light comedies of "Moonraker" ,"AVTAK" . It was also a very topically film at the time .Originally posted by ChandlerBing
Granted, there may be no Miami Vice scenes, but there are no James Bond scenes either.
#20
Posted 25 February 2003 - 08:46 PM
#21
Posted 25 February 2003 - 10:22 PM
Timothy Dalton is a classically trained British actor . Brosnan has had better directors than DAlton .Who had John Glen . Plus the hack screenwriting on Michael Wilson and Richard Maibaum. Brosnan has some quaility directors . Campbell , Spotteswoode , Apted , Tamahori , are all a improvement over John Glen . Plus in screenwriters Brosnan had Michael France , Bruce Feirstein . Even Neal Purvis and Robert Wade are superior too the work that Wilson and Maibaum did.Originally posted by ChandlerBing
Oh, so that's what the Dalton films were trying to do. Thank goodness they had an actor {read Pierce Brosnan}happy to play the part who could finally get the job done right.
#22
Posted 26 February 2003 - 08:15 PM
Goldeneye proves he could be a good Bond, it also proves Cubby knew best.
#23
Posted 26 February 2003 - 08:21 PM
Cubby Broccoli is dead ! So get over it . The last three Brosnan Bonds are a vast improvement over "GoldenEye" . Plain and simple. "GoldenEye" was a re-hash of every Bond proir to 1995 . Brosnanwas stiff and uncomfortble in the role . Since then it fits him like a second skin. I am sure you must love the Keystone Cops films of Roger Moore namely "Moonraker" and "AVTAK" .Originally posted by Daltonitus
I would watch any other James Bond film before I subject myself to the last 3 Brosnan films.
Goldeneye proves he could be a good Bond, it also proves Cubby knew best.
#24
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:01 PM
Michael Wilson a hack....hmm, he's now one of the producers responsible for the series. What a good job to have for a hack. Maibaum wrote or co-wrote a good percentage of the best Bond movies, and he definitely isn't a hack.
Brosnan wasn't stiff as Bond in Goldeneye. He had probably the best debut of any of the Bond actors to date. With Goldeneye, "Timothy who?" became a national catchphrase.
Back on topic, Sonny Crockett should have been in the movie, since Don Johnson has more charisma than Dalton ever had in his best wet dream.
#25
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:05 PM
#26
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:13 PM
Come to think of it, I'd rather have a root canal than watch Dalton as Bond. Minus novacaine.
#27
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:16 PM
#28
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:20 PM
#29
Posted 27 February 2003 - 03:27 PM
Richard Maibaum ran out of gas by the time of "AVTAK" and "TLD". He was fired , was he not by Broccoli. Maibaum wrote the early Bond films Dr.No , FRWL , GF , TB , OHMSS outstanding Bond . The quality of the later films speak for themselves. By the late 80's he was finished.Originally posted by rafterman
did you just call Maibaum a hack? dude, have not noticed that he wrote or cowrote 13 of the Bond films!
#30
Posted 27 February 2003 - 10:31 PM