
What was it with the priest at the graveyard in FYEO?
#1
Posted 16 January 2002 - 03:14 PM
#2
Posted 16 January 2002 - 07:45 PM
That to me suggests that the production team at least wanted us to think that something dodgy MIGHT be going on with the priest..
Maybe I've just got a suspicious mind, but it was a good point about Blofeld wanting to kill Bond personally...
#3
Posted 16 January 2002 - 08:01 PM

Because traditionally, it's been fairly obvious when a character is in kahoots with the baddie - either a knowing glance, or sly smirk usually is a telltale sign.
Dunphboy's explanation makes a lot of sense however. The priest's cross symbolizing his wish for Bond's safety is almost an ominous sign of the peril that 007 will later experience. Maybe it was even a hint for the viewer?
macca_bond (16 Jan, 2002 07:45 p.m.):
But why does Bond give the priest a kind of confused glance when he's doing the crossing (and Bond's getting into the chopper) ??
I don't know if it's confusion. It looked like an acknowledgement, or simple glance over to me. It might not have had any special meaning at all...
#4
Posted 17 January 2002 - 03:38 AM
The crossing, to me, is a sign from him to Bond as a sort of "hope things are alright", based on the urgent message from the office.
However, Bond's take on the crossing seems to suggest that something may be afoot, but I feel its just a device to hook the audience into thinking that something is afoot and the pre-credit sequence is about to hot up.
#5
Posted 17 January 2002 - 08:09 AM
Pity it then descends into rubber skull cap delicatessen sinister chuckling lunacy.
#6
Posted 17 January 2002 - 08:38 AM
Jim, you forgot to include screwed-up electronics in there somewhere.Jim (17 Jan, 2002 08:09 a.m.):
Pity it then descends into rubber skull cap delicatessen sinister chuckling lunacy.
I always found it strange that Blo****'s wheelchair control panel worked in such a way that by pressing a button next to the left monitor actually turned on the right monitor, and vice-versa.
Your the expert on wheelchairs, can you explain it?

#7
Posted 19 January 2002 - 08:42 PM
Rolex: I don't believe that the chopper was from the Secret Service at all. After all, the pilot wasn't. If I recall correctly, after the pilot is killed, Blofeld says "one of my less useful men", or something to that effect. But I don't really know what to think about the priest. It makes sense that he would be blessing Bond and the helicopter. And I don't see a need for Blofeld to have an evil priest. Blofeld himself could have called a normal priest and identified himself as a Secret Service man and told him to tell Bond a chopper was coming. But its also interesting that Blofeld would know Bond was there at that certain moment. Its possible Bond visits on a certain day and time, and Blofeld had him followed to learn this... I'm not really sure..
#8
Posted 19 January 2002 - 10:35 PM
Rolex (18 Jan, 2002 11:50 a.m.):Blofeld is in a wheelchair is this because he broke his back in the Battle Sub in DAF on the oil rig? If he did, how the hell did he get back to land? Surely the sub was damaged and I doubt he swam!
Blofeld wore a neckbrace (and was bald) at the end of OHMSS. Clearly being bounced around like a yoyo in the sub in DAF aggravated the old neck injury, and the acute disappointment at yet *another* foiled masterplan caused alopecia which undid the DAF hair transplant.
#9
Posted 23 January 2002 - 06:05 AM
The Ministry Of Defence is in the aviation business but SIS wouldn't be. They wouldn't have their own choppers and pilots, but would most likely have a charter flight company that would be fully vetted and security cleared. The pilots maybe from the RAAF, maybe not.Friedrich Baxter (21 Jan, 2002 09:24 p.m.):
Don't forget what Blofeld said when the pilot fell off the helicother. 'One of my less usefull people!'. So it's for certain that the pilot was IN the conspiracy! Was he perhaps nr.56? ;-)
In any case Bond wouldn't know if the helicopter and pilot was actually sent by SIS. In this case it wasn't.
Blof*** sent a message to the church, the priest passed it onto Bond who got into the helicopter thinking it was organised by SIS.
Not Remote Control Airways.

#10
Posted 21 January 2002 - 09:24 PM
#11
Posted 17 January 2002 - 08:46 AM
Blofeld's Cat (17 Jan, 2002 08:38 a.m.):
Jim, you forgot to include screwed-up electronics in there somewhere.Jim (17 Jan, 2002 08:09 a.m.):
Pity it then descends into rubber skull cap delicatessen sinister chuckling lunacy.
I always found it strange that Blo****'s wheelchair control panel worked in such a way that by pressing a button next to the left monitor actually turned on the right monitor, and vice-versa.
Your the expert on wheelchairs, can you explain it?
No, and I can't explain how the hell he got that wheelchair up there in the first place. Although I suppose the mundane answer is an elevator, but I really can't see Blo**** calmly oscillating his head with a blissed out smile in time to the muzak as the thing goes up.
I expect he made a mistake when he was ordering the thing and was too embarrassed to acknowledge that he'd cocked up, so he just exterminated the bloke who built it instead.
#12
Posted 17 January 2002 - 09:21 AM
#13
Posted 17 January 2002 - 07:05 PM
The priest was merely looking solemn, though the filmmakers obviously alluded to the fact that something bad was about to happen.
Bond takes this sign to be a bad omen, and so gives the affair a typical Roger Moore eyebrow. But seriously, this use of 'geste' as Brecht would call it, is simply meant to hint to the audience that something will happen. It doesn't mean that there's any significance in the gesture itself.
Though, as I have said, it's fun if you do read into it, and rather spooky. But still, it means nothing.
#14
Posted 18 January 2002 - 01:27 AM
I tend to agree with this...but I've always kind of wondered about it. It's very old-school SPECTRE to employee an evil Priest.Blofeld's Cat (17 Jan, 2002 03:38 a.m.):
In my mind he is a real priest, who gives the impression of knowing Bond from previous visits to the grave.
The crossing, to me, is a sign from him to Bond as a sort of "hope things are alright", based on the urgent message from the office.
However, Bond's take on the crossing seems to suggest that something may be afoot, but I feel its just a device to hook the audience into thinking that something is afoot and the pre-credit sequence is about to hot up.
#15
Posted 18 January 2002 - 01:45 AM
1. He was blessing to god Bond would be ok
2. Warning him.
#16
Posted 18 January 2002 - 11:48 AM
The priest said: "Mr. Bond Mr Bond. your office called! They are sending an helicopter to pick you up?!!" (And it's an helicopter totally equiped with remote control flying!)
Nobody can say what he was thinking. Nobody can say that he was the evil nr.6 of SPECTRE or just an ordinary priest. But I like to think that he was EVIL!
#17
Posted 21 January 2002 - 08:08 AM
I just spilt my tetleys.White Persian (19 Jan, 2002 10:35 p.m.):
Rolex (18 Jan, 2002 11:50 a.m.):Blofeld is in a wheelchair is this because he broke his back in the Battle Sub in DAF on the oil rig? If he did, how the hell did he get back to land? Surely the sub was damaged and I doubt he swam!
Blofeld wore a neckbrace (and was bald) at the end of OHMSS. Clearly being bounced around like a yoyo in the sub in DAF aggravated the old neck injury, and the acute disappointment at yet *another* foiled masterplan caused alopecia which undid the DAF hair transplant.

#18
Posted 18 January 2002 - 11:50 AM
For me priest is innocent as he notifies that his office has sent a chopper; which is true as Blofeld kills the pilot as it’s rigged. So, my question is who is the mole in the secret service that rigged the chopper? Blofeld is in a wheelchair is this because he broke his back in the Battle Sub in DAF on the oil rig? If he did, how the hell did he get back to land? Surely the sub was damaged and I doubt he swam! From the look of him he has reverted back to his original form: bald and wearing that Neru type suit. Why then would he revert back so everybody can recognize him? One last question is where is his driver? Being severely disabled, surely he would have at least 1 henchman to drive him to the disused warehouse.
Very bizarre stuff. Bet Hey they said they were bringing back a Blofeld character for Bond 20 maybe they will thread these questions into answers!
#19
Posted 16 January 2002 - 03:58 PM
He's probably just a Blofeld henchman though, and the crossing is an ironic gesture of the cover he was given to confuse Bond.
#20
Posted 16 January 2002 - 04:19 PM
I think you might be reading too much into this...
#21
Posted 19 January 2002 - 05:50 PM
Very nice remark though! 007 obviously referred to the DAF Blofeld, because he was joking about his hair (or toupet).
#22
Posted 16 January 2002 - 07:10 PM
My conclusion? I don't think the priest is in kahoots with Blofeld. I think the priest's gesture of the 'cross' was a way of demonstrating approval for Bond's visit to his late wife. A sort of, "You have come back to see her, may you be blessed."
Jim, you were wondering why the priest wouldn't just "creep up" and shoot him in the back of the head (a very Scott Evil-ean idea indeed)? Even if the priest was in with Blofeld, I think Blofeld would have wanted Bond's death all to himself. (You remember he couldn't stop laughing at the expense of 007 in the helicopter).
#23
Posted 16 January 2002 - 07:34 PM
Now I aint so sure. I agree with Dimitri Mishkin that Blofeld would have wanted Bond's death all to himself. Doesn't Blofeld say "I've looked forward to this moment, Mr Bond, I intend to enjoy it to the full" That might be a sign of that.
Mr Benson, also thinks it was maybe dream. Of sorts.
#24
Posted 16 January 2002 - 07:37 PM
The priest in For Your Eyes Only was merely blessing the vehicle and sending it on it's way, praying that nothing would affect it and cause it to crash.
The irony arises when it transpires that Bond's 'Office' just happens to be a 'Blofeld Double' (remember, never fully credited as Blofeld himself) controlling the helicopter by Remote Control, and the helicopter that Bond is travelling in does happen to come into less than favourable circumstances.
Upon later watching, when we know something bad is about to happen, does this mere Godly gesture have significance. Other than that, you should read nothing into it at all (though it's fun if you do).
Saying that though; the filmmakers include this element to do just that; spook you, and Bond.

#25
Posted 30 May 2003 - 12:14 AM
#26
Posted 30 May 2003 - 04:30 AM
#27
Posted 30 May 2003 - 04:36 AM
#28
Posted 30 May 2003 - 11:02 AM
Nothing unusual that he knew Bonds name, I am sure that 007 is quite a frequent visitor to his wifes grave.
As for the crossing....."If God had intended man to fly......."