Should James Bond Live On To Die Another Day?
#1
Posted 11 December 2002 - 09:33 PM
Or are you of the opinion that as long as there is an ever changing political climate there will always be a place for James Bond?
My worry is that the films will begin to lose their links with each other and we'll eventually have a chain of standalone Bond movies. Does Bond need a more consistant enemy to keep him going?
So I throw it open to you lot...should James Bond live to die another day?
#2
Posted 11 December 2002 - 09:44 PM
#3
Posted 11 December 2002 - 09:49 PM
Surerly he should have won the Greatest Britons competition?! Look at how many times he's saved our !
#4
Posted 11 December 2002 - 09:55 PM
#5
Posted 11 December 2002 - 10:38 PM
#6
Posted 11 December 2002 - 10:47 PM
#7
Posted 11 December 2002 - 11:28 PM
As there make movie number 50 in 2052 iam than 72 and Bond 100 :D:D:D:confused:
But i don't think there make 50 movie's in 100 years.
Mabey there make 30 movies and movie number 30 in the year 2027 than is Bond 75 years old.
Bond 30 title: The last Wish of a Secret agent
#8
Posted 12 December 2002 - 01:39 AM
#9
Posted 12 December 2002 - 02:08 AM
he cant be bond......to ugly and after pierce thats a step downOriginally posted by JackChase007
Jason Isaacs.
#10
Posted 12 December 2002 - 02:55 AM
Originally posted by BONDFINESSE 007
he cant be bond......to ugly and after pierce thats a step down
This coming from the person who thinks that TOM CRUISE can play a good Bond??? Don't make me laugh...
#11
Posted 12 December 2002 - 03:13 AM
#12
Posted 12 December 2002 - 03:22 AM
#13
Posted 12 December 2002 - 04:37 AM
no, thats not what i said at all, i said i did not want him as bond, but as far as looks were concerned......looks, he could do it. and any actor that is good at acting can fake a british accent but cruise to me could not be bond. but lets face facts...u cant have an ugly bond and if who you want is the name i have seen then you must want an ugly bond, but he will never get it because the producers dont want a bond that is not appealing.Originally posted by JackChase007
This coming from the person who thinks that TOM CRUISE can play a good Bond??? Don't make me laugh...
#14
Posted 12 December 2002 - 04:47 AM
Rich
#15
Posted 12 December 2002 - 05:09 AM
What you're saying is that Bond should look like a pretty boy. Bond is far from "pretty". He's supposed to be more of a ruggedly-handsome type. Tom Cruise is far from rugged.
#16
Posted 12 December 2002 - 05:15 AM
Rich
#17
Posted 12 December 2002 - 06:01 AM
#18
Posted 12 December 2002 - 06:09 AM
#19
Posted 12 December 2002 - 10:26 AM
#20
Posted 12 December 2002 - 11:51 AM
"Couldn't have happened to a nicer fellow..."
Cue rousing James Bond theme. That would be nice I feel to round off the series.
Oh, and it's my idea so if any of you copy it then I *will* strap you to a laser table and there will be no failure...
#21
Posted 12 December 2002 - 01:37 PM
#22
Posted 12 December 2002 - 03:06 PM
P.S Your momma.
Hehe.
#23
Posted 12 December 2002 - 04:21 PM
#24
Posted 14 December 2002 - 03:41 PM
Seriously, I don't see Bond dying within the next 30 years. Right now, 007 is the only reason why MGM is still alive. And as long as the box office is higher than the budget of the movie, Bond will live on and on and on. And Die Another Day shows that James Bond is still popular all over the world.
#25
Posted 16 December 2002 - 11:10 AM
#26
Posted 16 December 2002 - 11:34 AM
To be cliched for a moment - Sometimes you can have too much of a good thing.
No?
#27
Posted 16 December 2002 - 03:40 PM