Special effects of SPECTRE
#1
Posted 29 March 2016 - 02:38 PM
Interesting feature article about the special effects of SPECTRE, and some of SKYFALL.
Some of the before and after shots are great. The Morocco crater was basically empty!
http://www.dailymail...s-revealed.html
#2
Posted 29 March 2016 - 03:41 PM
Fascinating. Here's some more on this:
http://tom-i-butler....efore-and-after
http://www.awn.com/v...effects-spectre
#3
Posted 29 March 2016 - 04:35 PM
awesome! cool miniature DB5. A lot more CGI then I thought. Blofeld's base is just a sidewalk, lol.
#4
Posted 29 March 2016 - 08:20 PM
I wouldn't have guessed that the mouse was CGI. Love the Rome doubling for Tangier as well; very smart.
#5
Posted 29 March 2016 - 09:25 PM
#6
Posted 29 March 2016 - 10:21 PM
I wouldn't have guessed that the mouse was CGI. Love the Rome doubling for Tangier as well; very smart.
I'd never have picked out the Rome/Tangier shots. Seamless.
#7
Posted 30 March 2016 - 05:37 AM
If you want an in depth look at the special effects of Spectre I highly recommend you order Cinefex magazine issue 145.
http://www.cinefex.c...es/issue145.htm
Issue 133 covers Skyfall
http://www.cinefex.c...es/issue133.htm
And if you want to go way back, issue 15 covers Never Say Never Again!
http://www.cinefex.c...ues/issue15.htm
#8
Posted 30 March 2016 - 07:31 AM
Awesome read - thanks for finding! Blofeld's base actually shocked me...I had no idea it was basically nothing!
I feel so cheated.
Wow.
#9
Posted 31 March 2016 - 06:47 AM
Highly surprising to me - but that´s a creative use of CGI these days.
Seems like building sets like Ken Adam did is not financially feasible anymore?
#10
Posted 31 March 2016 - 07:15 AM
Funny how the films today cost so much more - SO much more, but you really don't know where it goes on screen. Half of the sets are evidently CGI, and as you say, the set building and ingenious devices and lairs are all but gone.
So where does the money go when previous Bonds could do it for a fraction of the price.
#11
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:27 AM
It depends, thecasinoroyale - are you remembering to adjust the budgets of previous films for inflation?
TLD was made for $40 million in 1986 - that's a phenomenal budget similar to today's figures.
But yeah, back in the 60s, the early budgets of $1-10 million went a lot further, even when adjusted.
#12
Posted 31 March 2016 - 12:28 PM
#13
Posted 31 March 2016 - 02:21 PM
Those days are long gone, alas.Highly surprising to me - but that´s a creative use of CGI these days.
Seems like building sets like Ken Adam did is not financially feasible anymore?
#14
Posted 31 March 2016 - 09:01 PM
Unbelievable stuff.
Really very impressive.
#15
Posted 02 April 2016 - 04:46 PM
Interesting reads, brilliant stuff. Makes me appreciate the film more, even though it is not one of my faves.
#16
Posted 02 April 2016 - 05:05 PM
Damn. The Altausse/Austrian establishing shot was so much more beautiful minus the SFX additions - I guess it didn't look "wintery" enough for them, but I much prefer the unaltered aesthetic.
The rest of those comparisons are incredible. This is what good CGI is. The amplifying kind you can't see. Not the kind that brags "how many polygons can we pack into Superman, Doomsday, Batman, and Wonder Woman pummeling each other."
#17
Posted 06 April 2016 - 11:31 AM
Very interesting, about the interface design on the computer screens in SPECTRE:
http://vincentlondon...o=007-spectre-2
#18
Posted 06 April 2016 - 03:18 PM
To all those who keep on banging on about how 'they' should be able to pop out a Bond film every two years, quite simply the productions of today are so much more of a mammoth affair than the films of the sixties.
The amount of work involved is just incredible.
#19
Posted 06 April 2016 - 04:25 PM
Whatever their individual merits, we're bloody lucky to get them as regularly as we do.
#20
Posted 06 April 2016 - 06:43 PM
Very interesting, about the interface design on the computer screens in SPECTRE:
Forgot to post the link to this article:
http://www.maxon.net...ng-spectre.html
Just read the Oberhauser accident article, which made me chuckle. Why are they capable to write a perfect fake article (they even use special Austrian expressions), but create such a horribly wrong headline?
#21
Posted 06 April 2016 - 08:14 PM
That's nice. I wonder what the watch stuff was all about?
#22
Posted 18 April 2016 - 01:16 AM
I don't like knowing too many movie magic secrets though!
#23
Posted 18 April 2016 - 02:37 AM
Those shots of Bond and Hinx driving along the banks of the Tiber are not very good, though.