Just a few sentences on the film.... I'll expand this when I get the chance.
Some incidental thoughts along the way...
#1
Posted 08 November 2015 - 05:19 PM
#2
Posted 08 November 2015 - 06:15 PM
#3
Posted 08 November 2015 - 08:57 PM
That's like saying the GF laser scene is a waste since he didn't get split in two.
Not at all. Connery wasn't touched in that scene. Craig had holes drilled into his head
A bit of a difference!
#4
Posted 08 November 2015 - 09:01 PM
#5
Posted 08 November 2015 - 09:03 PM
He said he had to get the right spot. He didn't.
He still had holes drilled into his head. That has some sort of effect on you (this is the Craig era). Instead he turned into Brosnan and stood out in the open gunning down a dozen guards to get away from the base.
#6
Posted 08 November 2015 - 09:09 PM
#7
Posted 09 November 2015 - 05:19 PM
He said he had to get the right spot. He didn't.
He still had holes drilled into his head. That has some sort of effect on you (this is the Craig era). Instead he turned into Brosnan and stood out in the open gunning down a dozen guards to get away from the base.
Would have been a good opportunity for Madeleine to take up guns and start shooting, demonstrating what was setup in the train scene, while Bond is reeling from his injury, and would have cemented Madeleine's care for Bond and Bond's choice at the end. Also, would mirror Tracy rescuing Bond in the Alps.
#8
Posted 09 November 2015 - 06:33 PM
He said he had to get the right spot. He didn't.
He still had holes drilled into his head. That has some sort of effect on you (this is the Craig era). Instead he turned into Brosnan and stood out in the open gunning down a dozen guards to get away from the base.
Would have been a good opportunity for Madeleine to take up guns and start shooting, demonstrating what was setup in the train scene, while Bond is reeling from his injury, and would have cemented Madeleine's care for Bond and Bond's choice at the end. Also, would mirror Tracy rescuing Bond in the Alps.
Not a bad idea, as long as she's not picking off guards from several hundred meters...
#9
Posted 24 November 2015 - 02:51 AM
Yes, the torture scene is fairly unnecessary. It seems a bit playful of Blofeld, like he's just found a new toy to fiddle with. Sadly, as we know, it's ripped out of Colonel Sun, so that'll be the end of that book ever being made into a movie. Less said about the escape from that meteor crater the better. Have you all read about the dream hypothesis? Almost makes it worthwhile.
#11
Posted 24 November 2015 - 01:19 PM
Over in this thread, I actually argue the dream hypothesis for all the non-Craig Bond movies, finally unifying a timeline continuity.
Ah. Not the same hypothesis.
This is what I was talking about:
http://www.ew.com/ar.../spectre-ending
Worth a read.
#12
Posted 26 November 2015 - 04:21 PM
Yes, I know. That's what gave me the idea. Read the post I made November 22 in that thread.
It seems with Hoyt and Lee Smith, that Sam Mendes directed a Christopher Nolan Bond in SPECTRE. There's actually a broader theory that any time a script goes haywire, viewers can 'save' it just by imagining all the characters are dead.
For Bond that might mean the beginning of YOLT and DAD, as well as the ending of SPECTRE.