Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

A letter for the next publisher


4 replies to this topic

#1 bond_azoozbond

bond_azoozbond

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 383 posts
  • Location:Portland,OR

Posted 23 December 2013 - 03:49 AM

Since we are not having a new game this year or even some news her and there , I thought sharing this article would be useful for us to discuss more about bond gaming future : http://business.fina...__lsa=0f40-f601



#2 Walecs

Walecs

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 789 posts
  • Location:Italy

Posted 29 December 2013 - 07:31 PM

I support this, because I agree a company should understand what Bond is before making a videogame based on it, and 007 Legends was not 007.

However, I think his criticism of GoldenEye is wrong, as Rare did an excellent job in portraying James Bond.



#3 Janus Assassin

Janus Assassin

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1898 posts
  • Location:Where You Vacation, Florida

Posted 30 December 2013 - 03:54 PM

I support this, because I agree a company should understand what Bond is before making a videogame based on it, and 007 Legends was not 007.

However, I think his criticism of GoldenEye is wrong, as Rare did an excellent job in portraying James Bond.

  

I agree with your statement about the criticism of GoldenEye. In 1996-97, you can only do much with the technology that you have. Yes, it was just a floating gun, but they nailed most of the movie aspects to a tee, not to mention other levels that they added to add to the storyline. Not to mention that game pretty much defined the FPS games we have today.  



#4 Walecs

Walecs

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 789 posts
  • Location:Italy

Posted 01 January 2014 - 02:34 PM

 

I support this, because I agree a company should understand what Bond is before making a videogame based on it, and 007 Legends was not 007.

However, I think his criticism of GoldenEye is wrong, as Rare did an excellent job in portraying James Bond.

  

I agree with your statement about the criticism of GoldenEye. In 1996-97, you can only do much with the technology that you have. Yes, it was just a floating gun, but they nailed most of the movie aspects to a tee, not to mention other levels that they added to add to the storyline. Not to mention that game pretty much defined the FPS games we have today.  

 

 

Exactly. Sure, if you play it today it looks a lot dated (it's a shame that the XBLA and Wii remake got cancelled, and we had GoldenEye Reloaded instead), but for the time it was amazing. Not only they captured the essence of the film, but they even expanded it. If you play any movie tie-in today, it's a game which will last about 5 hours, while GoldenEye 64 had a long longevity.



#5 jmarks4life

jmarks4life

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 295 posts
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 13 April 2014 - 05:08 AM

I don't agree with him calling Dalton's Bond "corn-ballish". Dalton is one of the best to play Bond, and portrays him the way meant to be played. Other than that, I agree with everything else he said.