Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Lifted from the headlines - Elliot Carver in Tomorrow Never Dies


4 replies to this topic

#1 The Gunner

The Gunner

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 24 posts
  • Location:Skyfall Lodge (ruins)

Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:12 PM

I've been thinking a lot recently about Elliot Carver as the villain of the piece in Tomorrow Never Dies (1997). It's interesting to note that the plot was inspired by media moguls like William Randolph Hearst, Robert Maxwell (same suicide cover off yacht used by M to explain Carver's death) and Rupert Murdoch (of phone-hacking 2011 scandal fame). It is a fact that Hearst did say to his journalists "You provide the pictures, I'll provide the war". He is credited with partly instigating the 1898 Spanish-American War through his media empire as the world's foremost media mogul at the time. Benson's novelisation has lots of juicy detail on Carver's background and on Lord Roverman, his father who was also a media mogul.

What are our thoughts on the role of the real-world presentation of media moguls in Tomorrow Never Dies, on how the plot of the film is literally lifted out of the newspaper headlines and News 24 culture of the late 1990s? Is it a satire or grimly close to reality - Fox News, Sky News right-wing commentary etc., The Sun, The Times etc. Politucal worldview through The Sun - famous politcal headlines like 'Up Yours, Delors', 'It was The Sun wot won it' (John Major's shock election win in 1992 after backing from The Sun) and 'Brown's Lost It' (2009) - meaning The Sun's support of New Labour).

Is starting a war for increased TV/satelllite/radio/newspapers and magazines really credible or does it smack of a parody/satire/a step too far. I remember reading in an early magazine piece on Tomorrow Never Dies that Carver had seen how the ratings of his media empire had vastly increased during the 1991 Gulf War (this probably comes from Benson's novelisation) and he associated war/conflict with increased audience/ratings. Even Bond questions the sense of starting a war between Britain and China (presumably World War III) for ratings - shades of Karl Stromberg in TSWLM creating his own underwater world - merely (as he puts it) accelerating the process of the decadence and decline of civilisation and of Ernst Stavro Blofeld in YOLT - both of which are massive influences on this film, mind.

So, what are your thoughts on Elliot Carver, Tomorrow Never Dies and media moguls in the world of James Bond. I think it works well, but it could easily have been preposterous if it had went the other way.

See this interesting 1998 article by Fraser Engerman over on HMSS for more details:

http://www.hmss.com/films/carver/

It seems that the bugging/phone-hacking/celebrity privacy scandal of Summer 2011 has added a new topicality to this (almost) 15 year old film. As a final note, I think that Tomorrow Never Lies would have been a much better title, but it was apparently missread by a staff member in a fax at EON and was never fixed...shame.

Also, I have read on the site that Harmsway was originally meant to have been the villain's name and the handover of Hong Kong back to Red China was originally meant to have been the plot - any further details on this - books or articles where one can find out more on this? This is all new to me. Would love to know more about the fascinating early draft of Tomorrow Never Dies if any members here would care to throw their hats into the ring.

Edited by The Gunner, 22 November 2012 - 09:48 PM.


#2 Iceskater101

Iceskater101

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2398 posts
  • Location:Midwest, MN

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:48 PM

Well that's interesting, because I studied William Randolph Hearst in my journalism class and he and Elliot Carver are very similar because they are both willing to go to war to make a profit. I personally don't mind Tomorrow Never Dies. I mean I have seen it so much that I don't want to watch it for a while, but I love the inspiration of this. I do agree with you if they had done this wrong, it would have been such a bad movie (which I don't believe Tomorrow Never Dies to be a bad movie) Tomorrow Never Lies would have been a cool name too but I have no problem with the movie title.

#3 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 23 November 2012 - 09:58 AM

I think 'Tomorrow Never Dies' is one of the top Brosnan Bond films, probably because it feels most real out of his 4.

Carver I admit never stands out to me as a memorable villain, but in the context of the film he works very well and adds a very real hint of what can, was and will happen in global Media, and how easy it is to create, manipulate and control countires and people with headlines and news stories.

And the fact it was used to such a Bond-like manner in starting a nuclear war was great, so it works very well for me as a current 90's Bond story, and villain.

#4 R. Dittmar

R. Dittmar

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 146 posts
  • Location:Garnet Valley, PA

Posted 23 November 2012 - 05:57 PM

I don't want to take us too far from Bondage, but the story about Hearst somehow causing the Spanish-American War has been in for a lot of debunking lately. This fellow has written an entire book about how Heart's paper had very little impact on the decision to go to war.

http://mediamythaler...an-war-but-how/

Anyone interested can look around his site and take a look at his book. Apparently even the famous quote about "supplying the pictures to supply a war" may be totally apocryphal.

#5 The Gunner

The Gunner

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 24 posts
  • Location:Skyfall Lodge (ruins)

Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:00 PM

Thanks so much for all of your replies.

Interesting that the war link with Hearst has been debunked - I didn't know that!

I'm working on a piece on TND and its media-related plot, hence my first post here on CBN.