
Skyfall - bloopers and gaffes
#1
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:57 PM
How about, to kick us off: where did Bond get his natty little Laird of the Glen outfit from if all he took to Scotland was the suit on his back?
Or: why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
#2
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:15 PM
She was in shock - she just shot Bond...why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
#3
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:20 PM
#4
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:32 PM
#5
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:54 PM
I saw a storyboard where Eve took a second shot that missed. Either way, I agree with the assessments that she was too shaken by what she'd done to fire accurately, or even to remain in the field.Or: why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
#6
Posted 29 October 2012 - 10:27 PM
She was in shock - she just shot Bond...why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
Yeah I know: a good agent would have had another pop at Patrice- and we know she's not all that good!

Any other bloopers, though? Does the nasty robot CGI Daniel Craig head plonked on top of the motorbike rider in Istanbul count?

How about the Head of SIS not having a burglar alarm in her flat?
Where did all the signs on the slippy bit between the Underground escalators go? There was one lying on the ground when Silva lands but nothing showing how they didn't stop him and Bond sliding down.
#7
Posted 29 October 2012 - 10:52 PM
never noticed that, will look out for it on my next viewingDoes the nasty robot CGI Daniel Craig head plonked on top of the motorbike rider in Istanbul count?
This is Bond we're talking about, he can get round a burglar alarm.How about the Head of SIS not having a burglar alarm in her flat?
#8
Posted 29 October 2012 - 11:00 PM
never noticed that, will look out for it on my next viewing
Does the nasty robot CGI Daniel Craig head plonked on top of the motorbike rider in Istanbul count?
I really hope I didn't spoil it for you! Might be easier to see in IMAX- in some shots it works brilliantly.In some it looks very fake.
This is Bond we're talking about, he can get round a burglar alarm.
How about the Head of SIS not having a burglar alarm in her flat?
Yeah, but she doesn't even turn one off when she gets in the door. I thought that was a bit odd, but she probably has some sort of super clever Q branch version that doesn't mean she has to enter a code!
#9
Posted 29 October 2012 - 11:00 PM
I actually would prefer to have long shots of riding / action as there will then be no jiggery pokery to take one out of the action. Also, you get a better indication of what's going on and just how bloody ridiculously hard all this stuff must be.
Must admit from my almost tangential viewpoint of the Albert Hall screen, I missed the escalator slip prevention bits, but they appeared not to be afixed at all so just figured they weren't used. Second viewing necessary, evidently.
#10
Posted 30 October 2012 - 01:45 AM
#11
Posted 30 October 2012 - 02:51 AM
I assume Bond found his "hunting" outfit in the Lodge. I assumed that is why it is so old-fashioned in its appearance. It probably belonged to Andrew Bond.
Now, Barbour will not be pleased!

I saw a storyboard where Eve took a second shot that missed.
Or: why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
Too bad, I would have preferred this option.
#12
Posted 30 October 2012 - 05:15 AM
I assume Bond found his "hunting" outfit in the Lodge. I assumed that is why it is so old-fashioned in its appearance. It probably belonged to Andrew Bond.
Now, Barbour will not be pleased!
Sorry, I'm a new worlder. My idea of modern hunting garb is full body camo and a garish orange vest. When I say Bond's get-up looks old-fashioned, I mean it in an awesome way. Would "timeless" be less offensive to Barbour?
#13
Posted 30 October 2012 - 08:40 AM

#14
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:26 PM
I saw a storyboard where Eve took a second shot that missed. Either way, I agree with the assessments that she was too shaken by what she'd done to fire accurately, or even to remain in the field.
Or: why didn't Eve shoot Patrice from the roof of the train as well as Bond?
That´s what I think, too.
#15
Posted 30 October 2012 - 03:20 PM
#16
Posted 30 October 2012 - 03:24 PM
#17
Posted 30 October 2012 - 04:46 PM
#18
Posted 30 October 2012 - 05:06 PM
I guess Silva would have gone to England either way. Bond was just one method to do it, and a deliciously evil one, therefore attractive to him.
Good point- why did he have to get captured anyway? What did that add to his plan? Just to have a little chat with M? I know he's mad, but it might have made more sense to try and kidnap her, then talk to her a bit, then kill her. Wearing a policeman's hat is optional.
#19
Posted 30 October 2012 - 09:59 PM
I guess Silva would have gone to England either way. Bond was just one method to do it, and a deliciously evil one, therefore attractive to him.
Good point- why did he have to get captured anyway? What did that add to his plan? Just to have a little chat with M? I know he's mad, but it might have made more sense to try and kidnap her, then talk to her a bit, then kill her. Wearing a policeman's hat is optional.
My suspicion is that bringing Silva back to London in chains (so to speak) and having him escape was just so the writers could shoehorn in the underground chase dumped from Die Another Day. I’m not convinced there was there was any real point in crashing that tube train. Did Silva hope the incident would draw police away from where the inquiry was being held? There must have been simpler way ways of achieving that (though they may not have looked as dramatic on the trailers). Much as I liked Skyfall, it suffers from quite a bit of this sort of clunky plot mechanics where story seems to be serving set-pieces rather than the other way around.
#20
Posted 30 October 2012 - 11:01 PM
#21
Posted 31 October 2012 - 12:25 AM
I assume Bond found his "hunting" outfit in the Lodge. I assumed that is why it is so old-fashioned in its appearance. It probably belonged to Andrew Bond.
Now, Barbour will not be pleased!
Sorry, I'm a new worlder. My idea of modern hunting garb is full body camo and a garish orange vest. When I say Bond's get-up looks old-fashioned, I mean it in an awesome way. Would "timeless" be less offensive to Barbour?
That's much better, TheManwiththeWaltherPPK!

But about the spare cloths, we can always assume that Bond always has a set of spare clothes in the boot of his car. And it would make sense if they were more "countrry clothes" than his usual outfit, since you don't really want to change a wheel in a Tom Ford suit - I guess.
I mean, hell, if you're going to equip your car with an ejector seat and canons in the front bumper, surely you'll want to be thorough and also have the hunting garb that comes with stowed away in the boot, with a spare toothbrush and, if you're really well prepared, a swiss army knife

#22
Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:20 PM
#23
Posted 08 November 2012 - 04:00 PM
Also; can you use the connecting doors on the Tube? I expect you probably can but no-one bothers. I don't think I've seen anyone ever do it.
#24
Posted 08 November 2012 - 04:07 PM
#25
Posted 08 November 2012 - 05:30 PM
#26
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:25 PM
Edited by bonds_walther, 08 November 2012 - 06:26 PM.
#27
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:40 PM
Ronson may have been a top MI6 agent with access to sensitive data and therefore with permission to have such information on his laptop, but Silva/Patrice happened to get to him and the data.How did a list of MI6 and CIA agents end up in the laptop hard drive of a MI6 field agent in Istanbul?
#28
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:24 PM
#29
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:45 PM
I assume Patrice must have run out of ammunition to uncouple the carriages, as if his weapon was still working, I would have expected him to blast Bond away as he ran down the digger's arm completely exposed.Why does Patrice wait for Bond after he uncoupled the wagons? All he has to do is wait until Bond has entered the digger, then run away and uncouple that wagon, too, and off he goes with the rest of the train...
#30
Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:25 AM
Hm. Must check. Third viewing is overdue, anyway.I assume Patrice must have run out of ammunition to uncouple the carriages, as if his weapon was still working, I would have expected him to blast Bond away as he ran down the digger's arm completely exposed.
Why does Patrice wait for Bond after he uncoupled the wagons? All he has to do is wait until Bond has entered the digger, then run away and uncouple that wagon, too, and off he goes with the rest of the train...
Another one: on the bridge, at the beginning of the train sequence, does he really have to do that motorcycle stunt? Looks a bit strange - why doesn't he just jump?