Would of he been seen as a better Bond for some if his voice was more deeper then whisky?
What about prescence, I've read somewhere that he had the same movement teacher as Connery, but still moved differently?
It's the voice and presence
Started by
NVT
, Oct 23 2012 06:35 PM
7 replies to this topic
#2
Judo chop
-
- Veterans
-
- 7461 posts
Commander
- Location:the bottle to the belly!
Posted 23 October 2012 - 07:37 PM
Is this to be a debate over Irish Whiskey vs. Scotch?
#4
The Shark
-
- Veterans
-
- 4650 posts
Commander
- Location:London
Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:35 PM
Bowel movement teacher.
#5
jamie00007
-
- Crew
-
- 555 posts
Lieutenant
- Location:Sydney
Posted 24 October 2012 - 04:16 AM
Well it took 7 years but that paid off in 2002.Bowel movement teacher.
#6
NVT
-
- Crew
-
- 177 posts
Sub-Lieutenant
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:50 AM
Indeed.
I think his name was Yat Malegram, I think he teached Connery how to own the screen with his presence, move like a graceful cat on the hunt. It's what got him in front of the producers.
I think his name was Yat Malegram, I think he teached Connery how to own the screen with his presence, move like a graceful cat on the hunt. It's what got him in front of the producers.
#7
Mr. Arlington Beech
-
- Veterans
-
- 1112 posts
Lt. Commander
Posted 24 October 2012 - 10:43 AM
In my case... certainly! Brosnan is the only Bond actor without a commanding voice.Would of he been seen as a better Bond for some if his voice was more deeper then whisky?
What about prescence, I've read somewhere that he had the same movement teacher as Connery, but still moved differently?
#8
Satorious
-
- Crew
-
- 470 posts
Sub-Lieutenant
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:50 PM
For me, the voice was always somewhat of an issue (it was a strange accent anyway and Mr Beech points out - never commanding). Plus I got the sense he was never entirely comfortable playing his scenes, although he did improve towards the end of his tenure.