CBN members' spoiler Review thread.
#1
Posted 22 October 2012 - 12:28 PM
I know this is the spoiler forum, but could I request that all major spoilers are placed in spoiler tags. EON requested that journalists not spoil the end of the film and not to release anything that would spoil the enjoyment, I think we should respect that. Anyone who is open to spoilers can click the hidden spoilers at their own risk.
I look forward to hearing your views and reviews and it'll be fun looking back at your initial views in 2 or 3 years time (as Zencat found with his DAD review)...
#2
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:25 PM
#3
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:32 PM
I'll be back...on Friday with mine!
#4
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:38 PM
#5
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:53 PM
I'll be seeing it again at the BFI IMAX on the Friday night, so sometime over the weekend I'll post a longer, more detailed review.
#6
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:57 PM
#7
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:59 PM
#8
Posted 23 October 2012 - 09:27 AM
I'm very excited by the way.
#9
Posted 23 October 2012 - 09:44 AM
#10
Posted 23 October 2012 - 10:38 AM
This is an interesting point.I know this is the spoiler forum, but could I request that all major spoilers are placed in spoiler tags. EON requested that journalists not spoil the end of the film and not to release anything that would spoil the enjoyment, I think we should respect that. Anyone who is open to spoilers can click the hidden spoilers at their own risk.
Bearing in mind the journos have all been asked to remain tight lipped about the story and the surprises, the fact remains that the only people who will be able to enjoy those surprises will be the first and second night viewers in just the UK, and the otherwise hermetically sealed.
The rest of the world will not be so lucky as the month of staggered releases plays out.
#11
Posted 23 October 2012 - 12:31 PM
Edited by AgenttiNollaNollaSeitsemän, 23 October 2012 - 12:33 PM.
#12
Posted 23 October 2012 - 01:57 PM
Great news, Shrubs. Enjoy it; I'm sure you will. Look forward to comparing notes once I've seen it at Friday lunchtime.Just got confirmation that I am seeing it on Thursday - I'll try and get a short first impression review up that night.
I'm very excited by the way.
#13
Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:20 PM
In terms of style and tone I would say it is closest to 'From Russia With Love'.
As predicted the cinematography is wonderful with several scenes (in particular the opening shot and especially near the climax) having a look and texture that feels like they could have been lifted directly from the original novels.
Acting across the board is excellent with several scenes in particular benefiting from strong dialogue that positively crackles with their delivery. The introduction of Q (Ben Wishaw) sets up what promises to be an excellent partnership between himself and 007 and feels 'right' in the present context of the films.
A big welcome back to Daniel Kleinman who offers up a dark and macabre title sequence (which while not quite matching the heights of his work on CR) effortlessly works alongside the atmospheric Adele track offering up several memorable images that seductively draw you into the frame.
The score works well within the framwork of the film but possibly suffers from lacking any distinctive character that I was able to pick up on first viewing. However I suspect my opinion might change as I subsequently become more familiar with it (and the film) but at this point it didn't leave a lasting impression.
The overall structure presents all the elements we are accustomed to but manages to do so in a way that feels subtley different. Ironically though it is possibly the final sequence that is the most traditional but it is arguably THE moment over Craig's three films that he has truely become the 'complete' Bond as we expect him to be.
It is hard to be any more specific at this moment in time but I truely hope you all enjoy Skyfall as much as I did. I suspect that we will look back over this period and reflect on it being a 'golden period' for the franchise which seeing as it is the 50th anniversary is suitably fitting.
James Bond Will Return!
#14
Posted 23 October 2012 - 04:48 PM
We should have a sepparate sub forum dedicated to Reviews like How we had for QOS
We should, and I'm sure one will be implemented. But until then, this is fine.
Also I'll back up JCRendle's request:
All major spoilers should be put in spoiler tags.
#15
Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:36 PM
Edited by antovolk, 26 October 2012 - 07:47 PM.
#16
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:00 PM
Skyfall undeniably proves that Daniel Craig IS James Bond and the world needs 007. Well done EON, and here's for another 50!
Edited by AgenttiNollaNollaSeitsemän, 26 October 2012 - 09:07 PM.
#17
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:04 PM
Spoiler
Definitely agreed!
Spoiler
I'm happy to confirm she did drop it
Spoiler
Err... WHAT? No!
Spoiler
I believe it just reads "007 / Top Secret".
#18
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:08 PM
#19
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:10 PM
I think I'm probably swimming against the tide here.... but I left the cinema a bit underwhelmed.
(I always get internet etiquette wrong but I assume I don't need to mention that there are loads of SPOILERS in this post. You wont want to read it if you haven't seen the film yet.)
Most of it is magnificent - with a couple of caveats.
I might change my mind with a second or third viewing but right now - 3/5.
#20
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:54 PM
Originally posted this in the wrong thread....
I think I'm probably swimming against the tide here.... but I left the cinema a bit underwhelmed.
...
I might change my mind with a second or third viewing but right now - 3/5.
Always a danger wherever enormous hype accompanies a production. That's why I generally try not to get carried away by the news and reviews. Not too much at any rate...
#21
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:57 PM
The Story
One think I felt was that people, a country and even we were in danger through this story of cyber-terrorism and what lies in the shadows out there. Silva attacking an MP hearing dressed as a Metropolition police officer? Chilling in how real that felt. It's a classic story of good vs evil, with no issues of trust and who to believe thrown into the mix like previous films. From the amazing pre-titles, I loved the fact that I KNEW James Bond and Eve were working together, and that MI6 was right behind them. In fact, it felt like the first time I'd seen Craig's Bond at his most comfortable in a mission. He knew his allies, he knew his enemy and knew his orders.
The stroy isn't filled with gumpf that doesn't need to be there. All 2 hours and 24 minutes is used to narrate the story of M losing a NATO-operatives list revealing their true identity, which also acts as the thread for villain Raoul Silva to bring about his mission of vengeance against M and MI6. It's believeable, which makes it all more tense, spectacular and thrilling for James Bond to tackle and protect the people and system he loves.
The Characters
Thankfully, not a single character was wasted, no matter the size of their role. A cast so full of talent, there was no-one who didn't shine.
- Daniel Craig looked and felt the most comfortable he has yet in his 3 films as 007, and I just feel he IS our James Bond. He forges relationships with the other characters that you believe in and want to follow. He is flawed, but takes steps to rid his demons. You feel for this man, because he's the man you've loved for 50 years. The Walther is there, the Martini is there, the quips are there and Craig delivers them better than ever and made me chuckle many times for the right reason in his portrayal as Commander Bond.
- Naomie Harris was a great surprise as Eve, lending tender acting with great brains to be more than just a match for Bond, but a fragile woman with clear motives for her career.
- Javier Bardem is unlinke a villain we've seen for some time, maybe even ever, in a Bond film? Silva is chilling, menacing, dangerous and un-stable but brilliantly clever. Yes, you may compare him to The Joker from 'The Dark Knight', but he's in a league of his own and really injects the film with nothing but power from his amazing entrance. Plus, his classic Bond-villain physical defect is something that has to be seen. Very haunting.
- Berenice Lim Marlohe is under-used as Severine, but only when you see how great she is as a girl who has a sexy, tough outer shell but very feaful and alone inside under the expensive clothes and make-up. She is a vital cog in the film, smouldering in nearly all her scenes and sharing an electric scene with Bond and Silva.
- Judi Dench is back as M and it's her best film out of the 7 she has done. There is no question of trusting Bond once more, but really the question of can she really convince the powers that be that her role in MI6 is justified? Tough as nails, firm yet tender, Dench shows why she is the Bond girl of this story and we see more to her than any previous film in the series.
- Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw and Rory Kinnear blew me away with their roles as MPs and MI6 staff. Fresh faces in a familiar story was always a gamble for Fiennes and Whishaw, but their chemistry on-screen just made me so comfortable in that they were the right choice for this film and really give some great moments together, and alone.
- The other cast like Ola Rapace, Helen McCrory and Albert Finney have smaller roles but their screen time isn't wasted and they bring great depth to their characters that move the story, rather than just populate it with any old person.
Istanbul, London, Shanghai, Macau and Scotland. That's all that's needed for this film and each location works. For each location, Mendes finds deeper hidden treasures like the Grand Bazaar, the London Underground, a misty Highland moor, a deserted ghost island and even a floating casino. There's no globe trotting for 2 hours, but a few select choices that are fully used to deliver a rich experience, which each setting lending to the narrative. The cinematography delivers in ways never seen in a Bond film before with sweeping shots over magnificent landscapes, every frame full of colour, life and well thought out shots. Your breath will be taken away more than once and the locations are just as important, I feel, as the actors populating them.
The Music
My only minor issue is that the music blended so well into the scenes, I couldn't pick it out most of the time! And yes, that's not even a bad thing as without knowing it, it was keeping the film going and adding to the tension, excitement and emotion I was watching without getting too loud, too quiet or too random. A stand out moment for me in the soundtrack is played as Patrice and Bond battle on the trainroof in the pre-titles. The tension is racked up more than ever thanks to Newmans score, and the threat is doubled with his brave score. It doesn't break new ground, but it's handled the way a soundtrack should be. It compliments the film and doesn't over-shadow it. Plus, yes, there are lots of welcome return riffs of the James Bond theme without it getting boring.
The main theme by Adele, 'Skyfall', sounds just as good on screen and cut down fine as you don't lose the haunting voals and deep meaning which means even more as you watch the film unfold. A brilliant song, a perfect match.
The Action
Yes, we have action sequences. No, they don't fill up 2 hours of the film. I can tell you we've seen them in the trailers.
- Istanbul's pre-titles car/bike/train chase never lets you go. It's full of daring stunts which prove no-one opens a film bigger than Bond. And you forget it's just the pre-titles as Bond rips open a train with a JCB digger.
- Shanghai helps give audiences a taste of Bond at his best, working from the neon-lit shadows with some great stunt work and a visually breathtaking fight sequence
- London delivers in more ways than one as Silva wrecks havoc for commuters of the London Underground and on the streets around Westminster. It's real, it's brutal and it's Bond - and seeing danger so close to home makes it more chilling and exciting.
- Scotland brings us a finale like no-other. This time, it's Bond keeping one step ahead on familiar ground and is simple, yet exciting and full of nasty surprises. It also, I reckon, features one of the biggest explosions on film in recent memory.
The Crew
Well, the above is due to a crew that know their audience and know their Bond. 50 years later and they deliver a classic feel in a modern, relevant setting. Sam Mendes directs the best Bond film for years with pace, understanding and love for the film franchise itself to give audiences what they want. It's editied in a way we can see the stroy unfold and not rush to keep up, even if hell is breaking loose on screen. The costumes are simple but they compliment each character, the camera work is smooth and steady, the sound is crisp and diegetic in many scenes which add to the realism of the film. It's just a result of 4 years of hard work, knowledge of the Bond series and of Ian Fleming's character, which is the most important part if you want a film this big to work.
The Bond Factor?
"Old dog, new tricks." Eve mutters to Bond in scene that sums up 'Skyfall'. We see Bond a broken man at times, a man who has lost his footing in a world he thought he knew, but we take the steps with him back to the man we know and love in a world that still throws surprises and meaningful stories. Just like 'Thunderball', 'The Spy Who Loved Me', 'The Living Daylights'...any Bond film you name, 'Skyfall' works with them and fits into the Bond canon perfectly. It's full of iconic Bond traits - the gadgets, the girls, the guns, the villains, the heroes and the music.
James Bond, the film character, HAS to change slightly to survive with new audiences and new world issues. Connery did it and Lazenby helped him. Moore carried Bond into darker times, and Dalton took the role into the 90s with a tone of things to come. Brosnan did it for a new generation and a new world, and Craig has done it for the 21st century.
'Skyfall' is still James Bond, it's still everything we love. It's a Bond film like nothing you've seen before, but you will NOT forget it for days after. It's certainly one of the greatest James Bond films to be made for everything above, and it will be up to personal choice how it sits in your top 23, but you can't fault it unless you really try.
It's Bond with a capital B. Daniel Craig is Bond and BEYOND.
Welcome back Commander...I can't wait for the future ahead if this is how you look at 50.
#22
Posted 26 October 2012 - 09:16 PM
#23
Posted 26 October 2012 - 09:32 PM
#24
Posted 26 October 2012 - 09:37 PM
I will, for sure. Say, @thecasinoroyale, some are saying the cinematography in this one differs quite a bit from the one shown on the trailers. Could you elaborate on this? Does it really look different? Cheers in advance, old boy.You're welcome, sorry it's long - I got carried away! Hope you enjoy it tomorrow. Hope? Forget that.... ENJOY it tomorrow, and let us know what you think!
#25
Posted 26 October 2012 - 09:43 PM
I will, for sure. Say, @thecasinoroyale, some are saying the cinematography in this one differs quite a bit from the one shown on the trailers. Could you elaborate on this? Does it really look different? Cheers in advance, old boy.
You're welcome, sorry it's long - I got carried away! Hope you enjoy it tomorrow. Hope? Forget that.... ENJOY it tomorrow, and let us know what you think!
Yes!
It is considerably different!
#26
Posted 26 October 2012 - 09:45 PM
In fact, the Shanghai tower block scenes are almost dreamlike, mezmorising and hypnotic. You'll love them. Only difference there is the shot of Patrice falling - it's totally different in the final film.
I think they may mean some of the scenes hinted in trailers and behind-the-scenes spots aren't in there, like Mallory and M reporting on Bond's location, Severine and Patrice in the Shanghai airport is gone also...but I won't say more, there's not lots, just a couple of bits cut but it no way affects the plot or narrative.
Anything else I can touch upon for you my good man?
#27
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:04 PM
Originally posted this in the wrong thread....
I think I'm probably swimming against the tide here.... but I left the cinema a bit underwhelmed.
...
I might change my mind with a second or third viewing but right now - 3/5.
Always a danger wherever enormous hype accompanies a production. That's why I generally try not to get carried away by the news and reviews. Not too much at any rate...
Actually, for this film I avoided all possible spoilers, news and reviews. So, I didnt really know what the buzz was.
Of course, maybe I hyped it up for myself by making such an effort to avoid James Bond for months beforehand...
#28
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:38 PM
Anything else I can touch upon for you my good man?
No, that´s about it. Many thanks. I guess someone else didn´t know what cinematography meant.
I will, for sure. Say, @thecasinoroyale, some are saying the cinematography in this one differs quite a bit from the one shown on the trailers. Could you elaborate on this? Does it really look different? Cheers in advance, old boy.
You're welcome, sorry it's long - I got carried away! Hope you enjoy it tomorrow. Hope? Forget that.... ENJOY it tomorrow, and let us know what you think!
Yes!
It is considerably different!
Wow, that´s really what I call elaborating.
#29
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:59 PM
Several reviewers have called the last act of the film lesser than the rest of the film. I can not disagree more. Suspenseful, emotionally charged, fantastically acted and directed.
I will write more tomorrow, but I'll finish on this. I can't honestly give this film *****, it wouldn't be right and I would be lying to you. This film is definitely a **********! movie
#30
Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:06 PM
Just got in. What can I say? Oh, my god! Not just a fantastic Bond movie, a fantastic movie in general. I know that Bond films are overlooked at the Oscars, but if Skyfall is overlooked for best direction, best cinematography, best acting - I will wonder what they are thinking.
Several reviewers have called the last act of the film lesser than the rest of the film. I can not disagree more. Suspenseful, emotionally charged, fantastically acted and directed.
I will write more tomorrow, but I'll finish on this. I can't honestly give this film *****, it wouldn't be right and I would be lying to you. This film is definitely a ********** movie!
Really nice to hear this from you. Wish I could read your review now.