
What are Silva's motives?
#1
Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:55 AM
#2
Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:59 AM
#3
Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:27 AM
Thanks to current TV spots (unless it's VERY crafty juxtapositioning of dialogue and footage), we hear M say that whoever attacked MI6 knew them, and is "one of us", with an image of Silva being played.
This gives the notion he's either a former MI6 agent, or something more to M (bodyguard/aide?), who has been betrayed or been witness to a big cover-up or "betrayal" of him/colleagues/services by MI6 and as he has suffered in some way, he is now back for revenge, or justice, as we see the words "Think On Your Sins" during the trailer, which indicates it's actually directed at M and her past motives.
Either way, quite exciting to see what the 23rd villain has in store!
#4
Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:46 AM
#5
Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:47 AM
I guess the other key line from what we've seen so far is "The two survivors; this is what she made us". That suggests Silva is aware of a prior link to Bond, although we'll have to see what that entails.
I definitely don't expect M to actually be any character's mother. I think both mentions are references to the fact M is something of a maternal figure to newly recruited agents, particularly Bond.
#6
Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:55 AM
I feel there will be a moment in Skyfall where the audience find's out what she has done and thinks, "Well, I can hardly blame him for being angry."
I think the most important clue is the headline "Assassinated?" and the pictures of M with that man that we briefly see on her computers in the trailer.
#7
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:02 AM
I definitely don't expect M to actually be any character's mother. I think both mentions are references to the fact M is something of a maternal figure to newly recruited agents, particularly Bond.
What was M's relation with Elektra in The World is not enough ?
#8
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:08 AM
It's only Bond she has that maternal vibe with, keeping him in check but knowing he can be trusted, like that line with Bond and Camille in 'QOS':
C: "Your mother?"
B: "She likes to think so."
#9
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:10 AM
In 'TWINE', M was good childhood friends with Sir Robert, Elektra's father, so her relationship with her not so much maternal, as something as someone trying to look out for her after her father was 'killed', but she was acting out of his best interests with regards to the ransom.
It's only Bond she has that maternal vibe with, keeping him in check but knowing he can be trusted, like that line with Bond and Camille in 'QOS':
C: "Your mother?"
B: "She likes to think so."
OK , thanks and yes I remmember that dialogue from QOS
#10
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:20 AM
#11
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:20 AM
In 'TWINE', M was good childhood friends with Sir Robert, Elektra's father,
M and Robert King were at Oxford together, not childhood friends.
#12
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:47 AM
Two weeks for you... Four weeks for me and everyone in the states...I suppose no matter what we think or feel regarding M and her position, all will become clear in a matter of days...!
Anyways, I'm thinking either an agent for MI:6 or at least an ally to the agency.
#13
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:52 AM
In 'TWINE', M was good childhood friends with Sir Robert, Elektra's father,
M and Robert King were at Oxford together, not childhood friends.
Sorry Shrublands, that's what I meant - I was being lazy and assumed maybe young adults rather than childhood friends, wrong wording!
#14
Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:48 AM
Two weeks for you... Four weeks for me and everyone in the states...
I suppose no matter what we think or feel regarding M and her position, all will become clear in a matter of days...!
Anyways, I'm thinking either an agent for MI:6 or at least an ally to the agency.
I have to wait until 22nd of November until I can embrace Skyfall!!


#15
Posted 12 October 2012 - 10:02 AM
#16
Posted 12 October 2012 - 10:36 AM
M knows who is behind the attack on MI6 but trys to conceal it from Mallory because it could jeopardise her own position. This is hinted at as Mallory looks accross at M during Bonds evaluation.
How wrong is M's wrong doing and how will Bond deal with it and how does that get resolved. That's the bit I'm intrigued by.
If they dont come clean with Mallory it also sets up some possible tensions in Bonds future relationship with Mallory.
#17
Posted 12 October 2012 - 12:24 PM
#18
Posted 12 October 2012 - 04:12 PM
Or is there a personal angle? I'm not sold on the idea of him being related to M in some way, but supposing M was responsible for some personal tragedy in his life. (A family member or members inadvertently killed during an intelligence operation, for example.)
All along less has been revealed about Raoul Silva than many previous Bond villains prior to release of the film. Well, two weeks today we Brits at least will know why Silva is doing what he's doing.
#19
Posted 13 October 2012 - 09:08 PM
#20
Posted 13 October 2012 - 09:34 PM
#21
Posted 13 October 2012 - 09:54 PM
#22
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:42 AM
This is possible. I was looking in the Bardem thread, and users were discussing the possibilityPerhaps what M does to Silva is how he got his psychical disability.
I think it will probably be as simple as this, but explored in an interesting way. Silva questioning Bond, drawing parallels and such.Spoiler
#23
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:44 AM
#24
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:24 AM
Yes, I suggested the teeth because in one review someone (can´t remember who) said he had a weird dentistry, whatever that means.
His favourite villain is 'Jaws' after all!!
#25
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:40 AM
#26
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:00 PM
#27
Posted 14 October 2012 - 04:59 PM
oh my god
i wish they would remake MARATHON MAN
with anthony hopkins
Erm, why?
#28
Posted 14 October 2012 - 05:36 PM
Same applies to the thrillers you listed there.
#29
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:30 PM
Edited by AgenttiNollaNollaSeitsemän, 14 October 2012 - 06:30 PM.
#30
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:49 PM
This used to be the ranking system, but not sure if it's changed over the past couple of years:
Recruit: 0-4 posts
Cadet: 5-19 posts
Midshipman: 20-99 posts
Sub-Lieutenant: 100-499 posts
Lieutenant: 500-999 posts
Lt. Commander: 1,000-2,999 posts
Commander: 3,000+ posts
It gets confusing if you refer to people by their rank, as there are usually several posters with the same rank on one thread.