Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

How to Write a Professional Bond Film Review


15 replies to this topic

#1 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 03:50 AM

So you want to write a review of the next Bond film, and possibly compare it to past entries in the series? Well, in order to impress readers with your stunning professionalism and eye for detail, there are certain elements you MUST remember to include in your review. Below is a breakdown of what is required; you don’t have to use all of it, but if you’re going include any of these details, this is how they must be presented in order to convince your readers that you know your [censored] better than anyone else.

First, your review must begin with the line: “Bond is back and he’s better than ever, and he’s going to leave you shaken (but not stirred) in...” This establishes that you are aware of the iconography of the franchise, and that - like the film makers - you possess the creativity and originality to come up with this clever play on words. THIS IS NOT OPTIONAL.

Also not optional is describing the lead actor as either:

a) Donning the tuxedo

B) Strapping on the Beretta, or

c) Taking the wheel of the famous Aston Martin DBIII.

He is also the best actor in the role since Sean Connery.*

*Except for George Lazenby, who was terrible (more on that later.)

Whatever the plot of the film, you must describe the villain as seeking nothing less than world domination, be it by threatening NATO, trading diamonds for opium, or charging a million a shot.

The lead actress is Bond’s equal in every way. She is a Bond ‘woman,’ not a Bond ‘girl’ like all the others who came before her.

Admit that the writing and directing of the film has its flaws – and it’s important to phrase this in a way that implies that you could have done better yourself, but modesty prevents you from saying so outright. Ditto for the editing and music.

Now, for purposes of comparison:

Dr. No: You went through puberty watching Ursula Andress rise up out of the water in her iconic white bikini. No other Bond girl ever matched her sensuousness.

From Russia with Love: This is the best film in the series. It was the truest to the source material (it helps if you have not read the book). The train fight has never been equalled.

Goldfinger: This is the template for the series. Connery was at his best and Oddjob was the best henchman (N.B.: all henchmen are mute). John Barry was at the height of his powers. Did you know Pussy Galore was supposed to be a lesbian?

Thunderball: Too many gadgets, too much underwater action. Connery was great. You are the only one who ever noticed that Bond’s swim mask changes back to blue. The climactic battle was boring.

Casino Royale: A psychedelic pop-art pastiche, satirizing Bond and the whole spy genre. Peter Sellers should have played Bond for real. The film ‘boasted’ five directors and at least twice as many writers, including Woody Allen. Could have inspired Mike Myer’s Austin Powers. Burt Bacharach’s music was Oscar-worthy.

You Only Live Twice: Fantastic! The perfect 60s time capsule. Slick, energetic, high-tech. Connery was bored and his Japanese disguise was embarrassing. Blofeld ripped off Dr. Evil’s whole image. (N.B.: When mentioning OTT elements (or lack thereof), be sure to pluralize those elements (e.g.: ‘hollowed-out volcanoes, invisible cars, etc).

OHMSS: “Forgotten” entry. Would have been the best in the series if Connery had made it. Lazenby sounded like Crocodile Dundee, and was fired after the movie bombed. Telly Savalas was too much of an American thug to play Blofeld (do not say that you identify him so strongly with his subsequent work on Kojak that you can’t allow yourself – or anyone else – to see him as any other character). Diana Rigg ate garlic before the love scene. The ending was a downer and the film was utterly forgettable. If you don’t like any of the films made between 1971-1999, then they were the worst since this one. (Or: it’s an overlooked classic (despite Lazenby) that was underrated in its day.) N.B.: You do not have to have actually seen the film to make these judgements.

Diamonds Are Forever: Connery was too old, too fat, unengaged, etc. This was a poor follow-up to OHMSS, as the Tracy-revenge angle was never resolved. The tone was too ‘camp’ (you don’t have to understand what that means), villains too swishy, car chase not as good as the one in Bullit (N.B.: no other car chase ever was, or ever will be). Climax disappointing. They should have kept Lazenby (yes, this is a contradiction, but that’s alright – no one’s supposed to remember what you wrote before, they’re supposed to be hanging on your every word now).

Live and Let Die: The beginning of the end. “Blaxploitation” bandwagon (be sure to apologize on behalf of all bleeding-heart liberal racists). Moore was too ‘pretty’ and boyish for the role. His performance was indistinguishable from his turn as The Saint. Jane Seymour = the Onedin Line and Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman. Gloria Hendry should have played Solitaire. Kananga should have won. One pointless chase after another. Buford Pepper, ignorant sheriff played by Jackie Gleason. Paul McCartney’s score an innovative change from John Barry’s usual. No martini!

TMWTGG: Christopher Lee was the only good thing in it. Low budget look. Solex plot unnecessary. Tone of confrontation should have been darker, like in Shane. Jack Palance should have played Scaramanga. AMC Javelin stunt spoilt by kazoo/whizzer sound effect (do not say ‘slide whistle’). Britt Ekland was terrible.

TSWLM: Moore had hit his stride. Barbara Bach was terrible. Movie was a frame-by-frame remake of YOLT. Stromberg was the best villain since Goldfinger. Jaws was the best henchman since Oddjob. Opening ski chase climax best stunt ever (include spoilers).

Moonraker: If you don’t like Bond films generally, then this is the one you refer to as a ‘typical’ entry. If you’re a Star Wars fanboy, it’s the best of the lot. It was either side-splittingly funny – as a Bond film should be – or a cringe-inducing embarrassment. Winking pigeons (see YOLT re: use of plurals). Drax best villain since Goldfinger. Jaws was either cute and endearing or a cartoon.

For Your Eyes Only: Refreshingly down-to Earth entry after MR (regardless of your opinion of MR). Reminiscent of FRWL. Moore acting his age for once was either a) a wonderful acknowledgement of Bond’s maturing or B) evidence that he should have retired after MR. Carole Bouquet was either a) compelling or B) vapid. Columbo should have been the villain. The scenes with Bibi made Bond look creepy. Describe Bill Conti’s score as ‘disco.’

Octopussy: A pale imitation of Goldfinger. Share with the world the little-known fact that Maud Adams appeared in an earlier Bond film in another role. Louis Jourdan should have played Bond. Aerial stunt double too obvious. Tarzan yell. Clown suit. Curry.

Never Say Never Again: Here’s the place to use all the clichés from the introduction, specifying that Connery was donning the tuxedo/strapping on the Beretta/ driving the famous Aston Martin DBIII one more time. Praise Connery’s return, but criticize the film-makers for not using the usual gunbarrel logo, title visuals and signature theme, and for recasting M and Moneypenny (although it was refreshing to see Alec McCowan play Q the way Fleming originally envisioned him). Bernie Casey as Felix – cool! Declare that Connery won the ‘battle of the Bonds’ hands down. Finish by hoping that Connery never says “never again”!

AVTAK: 1980s time capsule featuring Christopher Walken as the best villain since Goldfinger and Grace Jones as the best femme fatale since Fatima Blush. Moore too old, stuntmen too obvious. Opening snowboard chase spoilt by Beach Boys cue. Tanya Roberts as the ‘mysterious’ American, Stacey Sutton. Innovative fire-engine chase through San Francisco. How dare they kill off John Steed! Duran Duran rocks.

The Living Daylights: Conveniently forget that Brosnan was supposed to have made this one. Dalton was too serious and dour. Plot too convoluted, Kara too insipid. Confuse Mujahadin with Taliban and question having terrorists as allies. Aha (not a-ha) sucks.

License to Kill: Dalton again too serious. Tone of story about avenging brutal torture and murder should have been lighter. Compare to Miami Vice at least once. David Hedison too old to play Felix. Talisa Soto better than Carey Lowell. Innovative truck chase in Mexico. Winking fish statue. John Glen was a workman director with no style.

GoldenEye: Conveniently forget that Peirce Brosnan was welcomed wholeheartedly by audiences at the time. Lament that Dalton didn’t make this one. EON proves that Bond is still a relevant hero in the 90s. Sexist, misogynist dinosaur.

Tomorrow Never Dies: Rushed production, unoriginal henchman, rides the Hong Kong action film genre with Michelle Yeoh aboard. Same plot as YOLT and TSWLM. Carver too wimpy. Paris’ role should have been bigger. David Arnold better than Eric Serra. Cheryl Crowe’s song better than what’s her name – you know, the Canadian lesbo.

The World is Not Enough: Brosnan drama queen. Robert Carlyle weak villain. Include spoiler about Elektra, while conveniently forgetting that critics had been demanding a strong female villain for decades. Should have been Sharon Stone. PTS should have ended with Bond walking away from the bank in Bilbao. Disappointing climax. Denise Richards as a ‘nucular’ physicist? (Do not compare to Tanya Roberts.)

Die Another Day: Go to town – everyone else does. Even if you hated OHMSS, this is now the worst in the series. Bad dialogue, bad theme song, bad acting, bad directing, bad catering, Madonna. Promising beginning with bedraggled Bond in Korean prison – we should have had two hours of that. Lambaste the CGI effects, mentioning only the parasurfing scene – that will save you having to hunt through the film in vain for another example. Tamahori had no right to insert slow-mo or ramping edits in the film – he should have been more like John Glen. Film ‘falls apart’ as soon as Bond arrives in Iceland. Insist that Graves' satellite was powered by/covered with diamonds (because Blofeld's was, but you don't have to explain that). Blame the actors for their dialogue. Halle Berry worst actress ever (again, don’t mention Tanya Roberts – or Monster’s Ball). Compare to DAF, but not to Moonraker – Moonraker was a classic. Etc, etc.

Casino Royale: “Blonde, James Blonde.” Craig too short. Ears. Pecs. Armour. Little finger. Sucking fingers. Weeping blood. Parkour. Poker. Torture. Bourne. Goeffrey Wright as Felix – WTF? Too long – first and/or last half-hour unnecessary. Black & white PTS great, as was placement of the gunbarrel. Reboot (or prequel?); Bond Begins; James before he was Bond. (No matter how you felt about Brosnan you have to hate him now, and no matter how you felt about Dalton you have to appreciate him more.) Hate the Ford Mondeo.

Quantum of Solace: Conveniently forget that you’d said you wanted to see the next film more tightly edited. Hate the location subtitles. Hate the action editing. Hate the gunbarrel at the end. Despite all this, Craig is still the best Bond bar Connery. Love Keyes & White’s theme song. Keep up the comparisons to Jason Bourne. Quantum of Suckage, Quantum of So-lame, etc.

There you have it. Feel free to use any of these lines – just remember, they are not to be altered in any way. If you choose to use a * or _/10 ranking, be sure to study the rankings of the other professional critics first – after all, you don’t want to say anything controversial. A handy rule of thumb is to always put Connery at the top (except for DAF) followed by Craig and Dalton, Moore in the middle (with OP and TMWTGG last) then Lazenby and Brosnan at the bottom with DAD dead last after CR ‘67. Follow all these guidelines and you will soon be impressing your readers with your uncanny grasp of the details and nuances of the James Bond phenomenon.

As for Skyfall, the most important thing to remember is that, however good it turns out to be, it’s still just a two-hour long advert for Heineken...

I think that covers it all. Did I miss anything?


#2 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 20 June 2012 - 04:21 AM

Yes, but aren't some of these points objectively justifiable and not just terribly lazy knee-jerking? Casino Royale 1967 surely is a pop-art pastiche, unless it's actually a hard-hitting documentary about geriatric life and I have been so very terribly misled about it.

Some of these I doubt I would read anywhere other than a fan website really. I suspect many reviewers don't get beyond the more iconic images (and, granted, abuse their memory liberally). One of the more amusing recent ones I read was a description of GoldenEye in a tv listings as "A Pierce Brosnan action movie" which was either very lazy or quietly devastating; hard to say.

Still, aren't these things basically revenue generating behemoths for shareholders, with some sustained audience appeal? Criticising artistic decisions and manifestations of two hours of words from our sponsors tied together with knobbing, explosions and "acting" and some pretence at a story is probably a fruitless escapade - it is unlikely one review will bring it down - so why bother?

I like the one with the talking parrot as a Bond girl, or whatever it was.



#3 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 04:40 AM

I like the one with the talking parrot as a Bond girl, or whatever it was.


That's either FYEO or AVTAK.

One point I missed was:

Don't worry about getting names - or spelling of names - right. Diana Rigg could have played Tessa, Topol could have played Columbia...whatever.

#4 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 20 June 2012 - 04:46 AM

I'm not sure many people are that bothered. It's something to watch to stop the bleakness and he screaming for two hours. Names are for tombstones anyway; Blofeld said that in The Man with a Goldun Gun (1975).

The problem with received wisdom is that some of it will be wisdom.

#5 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 05:00 AM

Names are for tombstones anyway; Blofeld said that in The Man with a Goldun Gun (1975).


Now you've got it! You are definitely ready to proceed...

#6 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 20 June 2012 - 07:55 AM

*furioiusly takes notes*

Good read AMC! :D

#7 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 20 June 2012 - 01:14 PM

GoldenEye: Conveniently forget that Peirce Brosnan was welcomed wholeheartedly by audiences at the time. Lament that Dalton didn’t make this one. EON proves that Bond is still a relevant hero in the 90s. Sexist, misogynist dinosaur.


You forgot:

Eric Serra's Bond score is the worst ever.

#8 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 20 June 2012 - 02:08 PM

AMC Hornet, you hit the nail on the head. Perfect summary of all Bond reviews in major (and minor) newspapers.

I can hardly wait for what they will have to say about SKYFALL in a few years.

"Too serious, too much M, Craig hitting his stride as Bond, Bardem is the best Bond villain since Goldfinger..."

#9 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 02:50 PM

I wonder, are these things written in advance perhaps? Like the obituaries of famous, influential, noteworthy but primarily old people? And only updated with the odd piece of more recent nomenclature (Dench's M, Craig's Bond, BMW's BMW, so on)? I mean, it cannot be too difficult to write a SKYFALL review now. Drone on a bit about Bardem's shadowy villain and how he makes one forget all the other villains since Frobe's first and that white cat Bond battled in the sixties. Can it be that SKYFALL's fate with the critics is already written and now only waits to be signed?

#10 DR76

DR76

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1673 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 04:59 PM

Dr. No: You went through puberty watching Ursula Andress rise up out of the water in her iconic white bikini. No other Bond girl ever matched her sensuousness.



Oh Brother!

#11 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 06:11 PM

Thanks for the feedback guys.

Eric Serra's was the worst score ever? I thought it was Michel Legrand's.

Anyway, there is one other thing I missed:

Find sexual innuendo in absolutely everything. Here you can let your own sick, perverse sense of humour run rampant. Then criticize what you’ve inferred for being crude and obvious. (E.g.: “The timer is set for four hours – allowing for delays...” Delays? Ooooh, tsk tsk. Hey, it must be deliberate – this is a Bond film).

#12 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 20 June 2012 - 06:18 PM

I wonder, are these things written in advance perhaps? Like the obituaries of famous, influential, noteworthy but primarily old people? And only updated with the odd piece of more recent nomenclature (Dench's M, Craig's Bond, BMW's BMW, so on)? I mean, it cannot be too difficult to write a SKYFALL review now. Drone on a bit about Bardem's shadowy villain and how he makes one forget all the other villains since Frobe's first and that white cat Bond battled in the sixties. Can it be that SKYFALL's fate with the critics is already written and now only waits to be signed?


I know most reviewers don´t write their stuff in advance (having been a reviewer myself) - but, in their mind, of course, they have a certain viewpoint. And since that one is formed by many things of the past they draw from that heavily.

Fans always are a minority thinking and getting to know everything about their favorite subject. To find a professional film reviewer who is an informed Bond fan is pretty rare. So...

#13 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:41 PM

So...

"No no no, Mr. Bond. Respectable baronets from the College of Heralds do not seduce female patients in clinics. On the other hand, they do get their professional details right. The De Bleauchamps tombs are not in the Augsburg Cathedral as you said, but in the Ste. Anna Kirch. Sir Hillary Bray would have known!"

Or, in John Brosnan's words:

How did he [Blofeld] see through the masquerade? Simple. "Respectable members of the College of Arms don't go around seducing young girls."
(James Bond in the Cinema, 2nd Edition, 1981)

#14 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:04 PM

Don't get me wrong, BTW, I have the greatest respect for John Brosnan and I enjoy his book - he writes with greater style and wit than I ever could. It's just that, like Sheldon on The Big Bang Theory, I have to be right all the time (and probably for the same reason).

#15 triviachamp

triviachamp

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1400 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 21 June 2012 - 09:36 PM

Hmm how about complaining about Bond being too formulaic or not being Bondian enough with no attempt to address the apparent contradiction?

#16 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 22 June 2012 - 03:27 AM

LOL.

That's where possessing the uncanny ability to 'conveniently forget' comes in handy.