Now they're making movies of "Making of" books
#1
Posted 02 March 2012 - 09:16 PM
Scarlett Johansson will play Janet Leigh and James D'Arcy will play Anthony Perkins, and Anthony Hopkins will play director Alfred Hitchcock, while Helen Mirren will play his wife, Alma.
Variety doesn't bother to talk about the what all of this is based on, Stephen Rebello's book.
Rebello's book is excellent. While preparing my book on the making of OHMSS, I read dozens of "Making Of" film books outside the Bond genre to get ideas, inspiration, and to see what made a good making of book tick. Rebello's was definitely one of the better ones. Not as photo packed as I would have liked, but very entertaining.
The thought of Scarlett Johansson filming the nude shower scene will certainly draw interest and sell tickets, I will be incredibly curious to see how this film is marketed and released.
Sure, as a cinephile, I'll see it, but will the casual cinema goer really want to see a movie about making a movie?
But hey, if someone wants to option my book for a film, I'm all ears.
Who would you cast as Lazenby? Rigg? Savalas? The mind boggles.
#2
Posted 02 March 2012 - 09:39 PM
But hey, if someone wants to option my book for a film, I'm all ears.
Who would you cast as Lazenby? Rigg? Savalas? The mind boggles.
The hell with them. Who do we cast to play you!
#3
Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:11 PM
Sometimes, the prouction of films is far more interesting than the actual film itself. LAST ACTION HERO in particular springs to mind - the film sucked, but production was layered with problems and studios interfering, and so on. A film based behind the scenes of LAST ACTION HERO probably wouldn't be too interesting; I'm just using it as an example of a time when what was going on behind the camera was more entertaining than what was happening in front of it.Sure, as a cinephile, I'll see it, but will the casual cinema goer really want to see a movie about making a movie?
#4
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:05 PM
Well, if they can do it for Hitch, then they can do it for Cubby someday. Actually, I'm curious as to if there's been any talk of a Cubby bio-pic. That's when the studios may come a knockin' DNS. You know I'm rooting for you.
#5
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:52 PM
Why were the actual names not used in this instance? Was it because story strayed too far from actual story?
As for Cubby bios, I am still sure a proper Fleming bio will pop up first; whatever happened to that story that Leonardo di Caprio was linked to?
#6
Posted 03 March 2012 - 02:48 AM
#7
Posted 03 March 2012 - 03:07 AM
#8
Posted 03 March 2012 - 11:59 AM
Why? Because Lazenby was (supposedly) the subject of extensive criticism, and so having him narrate it would make him out to be better than he may have actually been?Of course, the film ought to be bookended by scenes of the author (played by George Clooney, I think) deciding to put the "behind the scenes" story on paper.
#9
Posted 03 March 2012 - 12:41 PM
No, because Doublenaughtspy deserves screen time for his efforts and enthusiasm.Why? Because Lazenby was (supposedly) the subject of extensive criticism, and so having him narrate it would make him out to be better than he may have actually been?
Of course, the film ought to be bookended by scenes of the author (played by George Clooney, I think) deciding to put the "behind the scenes" story on paper.
And by the way, I like Lazenby. A lot.
#10
Posted 03 March 2012 - 01:04 PM
No, because Doublenaughtspy deserves screen time for his efforts and enthusiasm.
Why? Because Lazenby was (supposedly) the subject of extensive criticism, and so having him narrate it would make him out to be better than he may have actually been?
Of course, the film ought to be bookended by scenes of the author (played by George Clooney, I think) deciding to put the "behind the scenes" story on paper.
And by the way, I like Lazenby. A lot.
OHMSS One of the best movies and books
#11
Posted 03 March 2012 - 01:04 PM
During his research for the book in Switzerland Bond expert Charles Helfenstein finds out that the unfortunate actor 'George Lazenby' was actually not just a secret agent but the real James Bond, who in a clever ruse played himself in a film production while he was investigating a case of biological warfare and extortion on the spot.
#12
Posted 03 March 2012 - 03:13 PM
Ah yes, I loved White Hunter, Black Heart.
Why were the actual names not used in this instance? Was it because story strayed too far from actual story?
It was based on a semi-autobiographical novel by the writer of The African Queen, rather than the making of the film per say.
There have been a few films based around the making of other films, but the more prominent ones, like White Hunter and Shadow of the Vampire, have been heavily fictionalised and not really about the making of the actual films per say. The most obvious exception I can think of is RKO 281 which was a TV-Movie. I expect the Psycho film will follow the more common path.
This reminds me of a film I watched in Media Studies a few years ago. It was a film based around the making of a movie. It was in the style of a documentary, with I THINK, was Johnny Depp in the lead. It was set in Spain, I think and the production was totally in chaos due to floods etc. Was really interesting. Honestly thought it was real, untill my lecturer said the entire thing was staged.
That sounds a lot like Lost in La Mancha, but that wasn't staged.
#13
Posted 03 March 2012 - 03:20 PM