Connery interview after being rehired as Bond
#1
Posted 04 March 2011 - 04:30 AM
he looks bored in this interview and he is so faking everything. what were the producers thinking?
#2
Posted 04 March 2011 - 07:10 AM
That DAF would make almost twice as much as OHMSS?
he looks bored in this interview and he is so faking everything. what were the producers thinking?
#3
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:42 AM
#4
Posted 05 March 2011 - 02:35 PM
He's never seemed that engaged in most interviews I've seen him give in all phases of his career. It's a part of his job, but obviously one he doesn't enjoy, but I don't see him as standoffish here the way he has been at times.
#5
Posted 05 March 2011 - 10:07 PM
#6
Posted 06 March 2011 - 03:06 PM
I agree, I also don't understand the criticisms of his DAF performance. Of course, a lot of that goes along with the whining about DAF not being a "proper" follow-up to OHMSS.I don't think he seems bored here either, but then I don't understand the criticisms of his performance in DAF. I think he's very good in the film and seems to be much more engaged and having a lot more fun with the role than he did in YOLT.
Connery seems very laid back and I'm sure as an actor it was a little different for him to take that approach with the character rather than playing up the suave or tough side as much, although those are there too. Hey, not a great stretch but also not like the experience he had on YOLT that may have contributed to his lack of enthuasiam.
It's part of the reason I like DAF more than many fans do.
#7
Posted 26 March 2011 - 10:34 PM
he looks bored in this interview and he is so faking everything. what were the producers thinking?
He is being honest. He is telling the truth. The way and how he says it is another story.
#8
Posted 26 March 2011 - 10:50 PM
#9
Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:53 AM
At that time celebrity interviewing seemed very primitive. They seem to ask the most inane questions and for someone like Connery (who admittedly doesn't suffer fools gladly) it makes it hard work to come up with credible answers. Interviewing these days is much more sophisticated and tailored to its subject matter.The more interviews I see of Sean Connery I just don't like him as a person. I don't know i think its the attitude he presents when doing the interview. Now He was a fantastic bond don't get me wrong, but as a person he seemed a little off to me.
But as a side to your opinion of Connery I saw him way back in 1983 at the National Film Theatre being interviewed and answering questions from the audience and he was relaxed and extremely witty and more than ready to deflate his own image.
#10
Posted 27 March 2011 - 02:05 PM
1. Connery hates journalists, considering them privacy invading scum, other than those who think his performance in THE OFFENCE is the greatest piece of screen acting by anyone, ever. (Who he actually DOES like except fans of THE OFFENCE, sycophantic golfers and Scottish Nationalists is equally hard to equate)
2. He has a low opinion of the character James Bond and Fleming's achievements with it, and, after all, Bond and Fleming between them stopped him having the same type of career as, say, Richard Burton or Albert Finney, didn't they? (He believes this because he was told it many times by his svengali, Terence Young, the well known auteur.)
3. He hates EON for - apparently - financially shafting him (though, as he states here, he has no interest in money, well £100,000,000 anyway...)
Just a mentally ed-up movie star, really, then, so what do you expect?
#11
Posted 27 March 2011 - 02:17 PM
At that time celebrity interviewing seemed very primitive. They seem to ask the most inane questions and for someone like Connery (who admittedly doesn't suffer fools gladly) it makes it hard work to come up with credible answers. Interviewing these days is much more sophisticated and tailored to its subject matter.
The more interviews I see of Sean Connery I just don't like him as a person. I don't know i think its the attitude he presents when doing the interview. Now He was a fantastic bond don't get me wrong, but as a person he seemed a little off to me.
But as a side to your opinion of Connery I saw him way back in 1983 at the National Film Theatre being interviewed and answering questions from the audience and he was relaxed and extremely witty and more than ready to deflate his own image.
Many years ago, in 1984, when I was a young runner working at Pinewood Studios, one of my tasks was to collect all the coffee paper cups and left over sandwiches from Theatre 7 after the crew had watched the daily rushes (the footage shot on the previous day). I was always in a rush - had too many jobs to do - hence the name "runner". Anyway, I had a pile of cups filled with the left overs of coffee and I came charging out of the theatre, without properly looking, and crashed straight into a guy, knocking the cups over him and spilling coffee down his trousers. Totally embarrassed, I looked up to apologize and found myself staring at the man himself, Sean Connery! I was totally speechless - plus I felt dwarfed by him. I'm 6' 2" but I felt like Connery was towering over me. Anyway, I expected him to tear into me, but he didn't, he was totally cool and, if anything, I think he felt a bit sorry for me. With luck, in Theatre 7 Block there are toilets opposite the theatre, so Connery just went inside and wiped down his trousers and even offered a paper towel to me to wipe my coffee soaked hands.
All I can say is that Connery was completely friendly when he could have been totally pissed off.
I think he takes people as he finds them.
#12
Posted 27 March 2011 - 04:57 PM
Thats true back then interviews were different back then. It seemed as if the interviewer didn't know how to ask the right questions and now today they know how to and most of the time when to. I feel inlightened lolAt that time celebrity interviewing seemed very primitive. They seem to ask the most inane questions and for someone like Connery (who admittedly doesn't suffer fools gladly) it makes it hard work to come up with credible answers. Interviewing these days is much more sophisticated and tailored to its subject matter.
The more interviews I see of Sean Connery I just don't like him as a person. I don't know i think its the attitude he presents when doing the interview. Now He was a fantastic bond don't get me wrong, but as a person he seemed a little off to me.
But as a side to your opinion of Connery I saw him way back in 1983 at the National Film Theatre being interviewed and answering questions from the audience and he was relaxed and extremely witty and more than ready to deflate his own image.
#13
Posted 27 March 2011 - 06:23 PM
The interviewer's the late Sheridan Morley (Robert Morley's son). I expect Connery would have known him already.
Lovely anecdote, Col. Sun.
#14
Posted 27 March 2011 - 07:04 PM
#15
Posted 01 April 2011 - 08:53 PM
2. He has a low opinion of the character James Bond and Fleming's achievements with it, and, after all, Bond and Fleming between them stopped him having the same type of career as, say, Richard Burton or Albert Finney, didn't they? (He believes this because he was told it many times by his svengali, Terence Young, the well known auteur.)
Thats an interesting aspect to consider David, ref Flemings achievements. What's Connery gone on record saying about Fleming's achievements? Called him a Snob. Fair point maybe, never met either. Thats all I can recall at the moment.