Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Just read YOLT for the first time.


16 replies to this topic

#1 Iroquois

Iroquois

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 114 posts

Posted 29 January 2011 - 06:24 PM

What a book. There's so much I want to say about it, but I'll try and be brief.

This book has left me feeling deeply moved as I feel as though I finally understand James Bond, the icon which I grew up with, as a character more than ever.

That feels like a rather profound statement because, ironically, Bond is very much out of his element in this novel. However, this is why the novel works as a character study, it de-constructs Bond to his very core and then rebuilds him as a new man.

Bond loses the love of his life prior to this novel and the next to go is his 00-status, along with the dangerous assignments and weapons of which it goes hand-in-hand. He is then stripped of his infamous lifestyle and even his physical appearance, name and culture as he goes undercover as a Japanese miner. It could be argued that Bond also loses his sense of duty to his country as, upon finding out that Shatterhand is in fact Blofeld, he keeps this to himself so he can kill him personally.

However, at his core, Bond does retain his sense of right and wrong and this, along with his wit, courage and sheer fighting spirit is what he is left with as he stands unarmed and half-naked against the looming figure of his opposite, Blofeld. I think the whole scene is symbolic to James Bond's core, with Blofeld representing the guilt that Bond feels about the dark side of his chosen profession and how it robbed him of his wife. This guilt has captured Bond in it's 'Castle Of Death', which perhaps represents Bond's mind (as it is very much focused on death throughout the novel, not to read into things too much).

Yet, it is the sense of right and wrong, wit, courage and fighting spirit which brings Bond out on top by killing Blofeld and destroying his very evil lair. Thus his soul is cleansed and the broken man experiences redemption. Before he loses his entire identity through amnesia and literally becomes a new man (even to the point of which he, James Bond, loses his sexual drive!), we see his whole life flash before our eyes through M's obituary, and as a final salute to the character, we learn of his philosophy through his quote "I shall not waste my days in trying to prolong them. I shall use my time."

I believe this novel also gives us perhaps the best idea as to Bond's demeanour, since his sense of humour is better than ever and the character radiates the confidence and charisma of the on-screen Bond (of course, these qualities are present in the other novels, in spite of what some people think, but it feels as though it has all built up to this point). The moment when Bond returns from the question room, about to be executed and just casually sits down and lights a cigarette is the sort of thing I can imagine any of the Bond actors doing, and it makes it oh so much more poignant when later on we see Bond struggling in the water, swimming around in circles with no idea what's going on.

Obviously I could go on about how well written the other characters are, how amazingly vivid Japan is, and how haunting the Garden of Death is in this book, but it's rightly all been said before, but I quite simply wanted to talk about Bond as a character now I have seen him in a very different light, and how I admire the character more than ever. :)

#2 Liparus

Liparus

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 46 posts

Posted 29 January 2011 - 06:57 PM

After the classic Moonraker, YOLT is my favorite. A wonderful travel between reality and nightmare... :tup:

#3 Zographos

Zographos

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 165 posts

Posted 29 January 2011 - 07:08 PM

Hated it! Bond seeing therapists? Weepy melodrama? Sigh - another revenge plot? Why can't the series have some Fun™ for a change, tongue firmly© in cheek?

Sounds like Babs needs to ditch this Fleming nerd, give us back 007 (none of this 7777 nonsense), and stop chasing the Oscar crowd!




All kidding aside, yes, You Only Live Twice is in many ways a peak in the series. Heartbreaking, yet at the same time exhilirating, Fleming managed to craft a lot of tension despite minimal reliance on action and confrontation. A favourite of mine, though it's hard to see it being filmed today, and harder to see fans accepting it.

#4 chrisno1

chrisno1

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 931 posts

Posted 01 February 2011 - 01:04 AM

Interesting post Iroquois. I won't really argue with what you say, you've got it pretty much spot on.
I'd only add that I think it's significant that Blofeld's / Shatterhand's Garden of Death is designed so people can commit suicide. While Bond doesn't necessarily want to do that, he is scertainly under the impression he is unlikely to return, and is happy with the outcome if it removes the killer of his wife. To the death indeed.
The final line about "Sparrow's Tears" is poignant and heartbreaking. Having found solace (!) Bond loses it to a single word. While Fleming's codas often leave something to be desired, the gentle rhetoric here succeeds beautifully. Overall, as you say, I'm not sure Fleming's Bond ever felt so genuine.

#5 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 01 February 2011 - 02:02 AM

Great thread. YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE stands head and shoulders above all of the other Bond novels. It is, I think, the one great masterpiece of the literary 007 canon.

There are other fine Bond novels - a few, anyway, and nearly all of them written by Fleming - but YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE is the only one that really takes flight as literature and a work of art (oh, and also as a vivid travelogue of and a remarkably accurate study of Japan that remains relevant all these decades on).

#6 Marlowe

Marlowe

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 10 posts

Posted 01 February 2011 - 02:03 PM

Definitely a great book. One of the finest of the English novels. :tup:
Blofled in a chivalry's armour, i love the idea !

#7 dogmanstar

dogmanstar

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 446 posts
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 01 February 2011 - 04:57 PM

Good review, Iroquois, and thanks for it!

I read it first as a teenager and can't say that I got much out of it. It's so odd in the Bond canon--less of a plot, more atmospheric. I was expecting the smash-bang of the movies and some of the other novels.

But as I've grown, I've come to appreciate it so much more for those very elements that you list in your review.

#8 Shakey Martini

Shakey Martini

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Berkshire 'Royale', United Kingdom

Posted 04 February 2011 - 06:41 PM

Interesting review Iroquois, like Dogmanstar I first read this as a young teenager and found it very slow moving, though to be fair it was only my third Fleming novel and I was still comparing this James Bond to his film counterpart. Even so this negative view of the book stayed with me long after I had read all the novels many times, but gradually as I have come to learn more and understand Ian Fleming himself I have started to find a new respect for this novel. The constant death motifs that reoccur throughout the novel probably reflect Ian Fleming's drastically failing health at the time of writing (he had just suffered a major heart attack) and with the extended travelogue descriptions that take up almost two thirds of the book ( much of it recycled from a journey Ian himself made while writing travel articles for the Sunday Times) makes this possibly the authors most personal work. While I wouldn't count this as one of my favourite Bond novels it is still a worthy and unmissable chapter of the life of James Bond.

Edited by Shakey Martini, 04 February 2011 - 06:43 PM.


#9 FLEMINGFAN

FLEMINGFAN

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Location:New York area

Posted 04 February 2011 - 08:15 PM

Great reviews, and glad to see the appreciation for the novel so many years after it was published.
I read it when it first came out and loved it back then. It should also be noted that at time that it was to be Ian Fleming's last James Bond adventure, but the publisher made him tack on the last chapter (Think about the idea of James Bond dying in 1964, just as he was hitting the top!).
That said, Fleming never failed to be original. Most authors would have followed up the excellent ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE with a bigger slam-bang globe-trotting action tale. Instead, Fleming chose an almost cerebral follow-up, showing feelings rather than actions.
It is also the book that, I think, Fleming and Bond really blended in the sense that the entire Japan adventure was pretty much the exact same things Fleming did for research over there (aside from the Bond/Shatterhand castle fiction).
As an homage to that book (which could never really be filmed properly since it is mainly about sensory and inner emotional things), they should call the next film SHATTERHAND and make him the head of QUANTUM.

#10 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 04 February 2011 - 08:54 PM

It should also be noted that at time that it was to be Ian Fleming's last James Bond adventure, but the publisher made him tack on the last chapter

Um... what? That's not true, at all; where did you hear that?

#11 General G.

General G.

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 81 posts
  • Location:No. 13 Sretenka Ulitsa

Posted 05 February 2011 - 06:44 PM

As an homage to that book (which could never really be filmed properly since it is mainly about sensory and inner emotional things), they should call the next film SHATTERHAND and make him the head of QUANTUM.

That would be smashing.

#12 Kreivi von Glödä

Kreivi von Glödä

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 36 posts
  • Location:Finland

Posted 07 February 2011 - 08:14 AM

Excellent review, excellent book. I´ve always wondered about that speech Blofeld gives to Bond, could it have been a reflection of Flemings own distaste/criticism about the Bond character?
YOLT is probably closest to a pure horror novel of Flemings output, the Garden of Death is Hell and Blofeld its Satan. YOLT would have concluded the Bond saga beuatifully with a bittersweet note and TMWTGG is a bum note coda...

Edited by Kreivi von Glödä, 07 February 2011 - 08:45 AM.


#13 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 07 February 2011 - 12:00 PM

It should also be noted that at time that it was to be Ian Fleming's last James Bond adventure, but the publisher made him tack on the last chapter

Um... what? That's not true, at all; where did you hear that?


Well, it's not as though this supposedly tacked-on last chapter saves Bond's life, for it implies that he will be captured and killed as soon as he sets foot in Soviet Russia. At the same time, the reader knows (while Bond himself doesn't) that he will go on to - in a way - "live twice" through the child that Kissy is carrying.

Still, I've always wondered whether Fleming intended YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE as the last Bond novel. It certainly feels very "final", and I cannot imagine a better ending for the series than its poignant and subtle last chapter. As Kreivi von Glödä points out: "YOLT would have concluded the Bond saga beuatifully with a bittersweet note and TMWTGG is a bum note coda..." (Although I do enjoy THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN - it's atmospheric and underrated stuff.)

FLEMINGFAN, what's your source for your claim that YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE was originally going to be the conclusion of the series? It does seem highly plausible, but I'd like to know your source.

#14 FLEMINGFAN

FLEMINGFAN

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Location:New York area

Posted 08 February 2011 - 02:48 AM


It should also be noted that at time that it was to be Ian Fleming's last James Bond adventure, but the publisher made him tack on the last chapter

Um... what? That's not true, at all; where did you hear that?


Well, it's not as though this supposedly tacked-on last chapter saves Bond's life, for it implies that he will be captured and killed as soon as he sets foot in Soviet Russia. At the same time, the reader knows (while Bond himself doesn't) that he will go on to - in a way - "live twice" through the child that Kissy is carrying.

Still, I've always wondered whether Fleming intended YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE as the last Bond novel. It certainly feels very "final", and I cannot imagine a better ending for the series than its poignant and subtle last chapter. As Kreivi von Glödä points out: "YOLT would have concluded the Bond saga beuatifully with a bittersweet note and TMWTGG is a bum note coda..." (Although I do enjoy THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN - it's atmospheric and underrated stuff.)

FLEMINGFAN, what's your source for your claim that YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE was originally going to be the conclusion of the series? It does seem highly plausible, but I'd like to know your source.

Just the usual articles that came out in 1963 and 1964 prior to the book's release. Most of it started when Bond's obit was published prior to the book coming out and the huge public backlash and reaction to it.
The title pretty much says it all as Bond was already killed once at the end of FROM RUSSIA, WITH LOVE and came back for his 'second life' in DOCTOR NO.

#15 Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1376 posts

Posted 11 February 2011 - 03:40 AM

Also, in a way, Fleming followed in the footsteps of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who tried to kill off Sherlock Holmes (Holmes appeared to perish in a fight with Moriarty) only to bring him back by popular demand. I remember my father, who had read several of the Bond novels, telling me about how the YOLT novel was an attempt to kill off Bond. This would have been at the height of Bondmania in the mid-60s and I had just gotten the Bond bug. I was shocked to hear it. A couple of years later, when the movie YOLT came out, my father told me how the movie had little to do with the novel.

#16 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 11 February 2011 - 03:57 AM

From Russia with Love draws the better parallels with "The Final Problem", because in YOLT, Bond obviously survives -- whereas, in FRWL, Fleming deliberately changed the ending from his first draft (in which Klebb is captured without stabbing Bond, and 007 subsequently joins Tatiana in their Paris hotel room) to one where Bond seems on the brink of death, if not dead, already; Fleming clearly thought he was through with the character.

Fortunately, Bond would not have a Great Hiatus to change his character for the worse, as Holmes did... ;)

#17 Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1376 posts

Posted 11 February 2011 - 04:11 AM

From Russia with Love draws the better parallels with "The Final Problem", because in YOLT, Bond obviously survives -- whereas, in FRWL, Fleming deliberately changed the ending from his first draft (in which Klebb is captured without stabbing Bond, and 007 subsequently joins Tatiana in their Paris hotel room) to one where Bond seems on the brink of death, if not dead, already; Fleming clearly thought he was through with the character.

Fortunately, Bond would not have a Great Hiatus to change his character for the worse, as Holmes did... ;)


Mr. Blofeld...good point. I suppose you could say Fleming followed the Doyle example not once, but twice. On the one occasion I had a chance to look at Fleming manuscripts at Indiana University's Lilly Library, I made a point to check out From Russia With Love. I was curious whether the ending with Bond passing out was in the original manuscript. As you indicated, it didn't. (It was also great to check out Fleming letters with the likes of Raymond Chandler and Allan Dulles.)