Jeremy Duns uncovers a lost screenplay based on Ian Fleming's The Diamond Smugglers
How Ian Fleming's book on gems was neglected
#1
Posted 08 March 2010 - 04:00 AM
#2
Posted 08 March 2010 - 04:13 AM
#3
Posted 08 March 2010 - 04:18 AM
#4
Posted 08 March 2010 - 07:16 AM
#5
Posted 08 March 2010 - 11:51 AM
Very good job, Jeremy!!!
#6
Posted 08 March 2010 - 12:07 PM
#7
Posted 08 March 2010 - 03:50 PM
#8
Posted 08 March 2010 - 05:07 PM
#9
Posted 08 March 2010 - 08:19 PM
#10
Posted 08 March 2010 - 08:51 PM
The Sunday Times piece is a condensed version of a much longer article I've written, which goes into more detail about the precise timeline of the project, the contents of the script, and the background of the book. John Collard's family very kindly gave me access to a huge amount of material, including correspondence, IDSO agents' reports, and the complete manuscript of his book. It's fascinating to see Fleming's annotations on some of this, and to see what he kept, what he cut, and what he adapted. I hope I can publish that article shortly.
Right. I'm off to find Fleming's Moonraker script.
#11
Posted 08 March 2010 - 09:06 PM
Right. I'm off to find Fleming's Moonraker script.
We all keep our fingers crossed for you!
#12
Posted 09 March 2010 - 12:02 AM
Now if I read it correctly, it seems as if James Bond himself is a character in The Diamond Smugglers. If I am wrong, please feel free to correct me!
This brings up two very interesting points (at least to me):
1. Although the film rights seem to have gone to others, and no mention is made of EON or UA or MGM or even Sony in the article, I seem to recall that when Cubby and Harry Saltzman bought the rights to the Bond books way back when, it meant ALL of the books (except CR and we can never forget that Thunderball was problematic) with first refusal options on non Fleming Bond books (but that might have come later) and the right to make Bond films not based on Fleming titles. I don't think there is any doubt that EON has the rights to make 007 in New York from Thrilling Cities into a film if they ever choose to do so. But, does that mean, that although it was non-fiction, do they also have the rights to make the entire Thrilling Cities into a film? (it would never happen, but just food for thought--who knows, they could always do a documentary style mini-series for a cable network based on it!) So, given that The Diamond Smugglers, although based on fact, appears to feature Bond somewhere in the book (I am not talking about the 007 reference in the article re: the screenplay, but rather the beginning of the article) does EON theoretically have the rights to make Bond 23 The Diamond Smugglers? Or, an even more compelling thought, do whoever own the film rights to The Diamond Smugglers, even IFP--presuming the rights reverted back to them at one point--now have the right to make an independent production--even a Bond film--based on whatever Bond references are in the book, or does EON/MGM/UA/Sony have the film rights, even if Bond may be a minor character, at best? (Given the current legal wranglings for MGM, I know this is a pure hypothetical!)
2. Has anyone actually read Fleming's The Diamond Smugglers novel? Does Bond feature at all, and for that matter, how about M, Tanner, Boothroyd, Moneypenny or any of the other characters from the Bond novels? And, whether they do or not, is it worth picking up? I followed the link from the article and it appears as if IFP have it for around $27 US plus shipping--not an exorbitant price.
Again, if I am wrong about any of my presumptions here, please feel free to correct me. This is an area of Fleming/Bond history of which I am not greatly aware!
Thanks.
Bill
#13
Posted 09 March 2010 - 12:18 AM
Great article!
Thanks, Bill - glad you enjoyed it.
Now if I read it correctly, it seems as if James Bond himself is a character in The Diamond Smugglers. If I am wrong, please feel free to correct me!
No, James Bond is not a character in The Diamond Smugglers. In the book, the character is called John Blaize. In Jon Cleary's screenplay, he is called Roy O'Brien. In both, he is a secret agent investigating diamond-smuggling in South Africa and what is now Namibia, and while he's not a milion miles from Bond, he's not Bond. In the summer of 1965, the producer, George Willoughby, considered changing the name back to John Blaize and then John Blaine (because of a risk of confusion with Modesty Blaise, which was then being filmed).
I have no idea of the current rights situation regarding The Diamond Smugglers, sorry.
Has anyone actually read Fleming's The Diamond Smugglers novel? Does Bond feature at all, and for that matter, how about M, Tanner, Boothroyd, Moneypenny or any of the other characters from the Bond novels?
No, none of these feature. Fleming's book is non-fiction, about the real-life investigations of the International Diamond Security Organisation in Africa. The screenplay is a thriller that uses several elements from the book. For example, Fleming wrote about the security measures in one of the diamond mines; in Jon Cleary's screenplay, there is a scene in which the protagonist had to go through those same measures. In the book, Fleming wrote about how the Chinese are encroaching into the diamond-smuggling world; in the screenplay, the Chinese are the big villains the agent has to stop, so they don't use diamonds to fund global Communism. In the book, Fleming wrote about a failed attempt to fly a parcel of stolen diamonds out from a beach on the Skeleton Coast; this was the inspiration for the pretitles scene. And so on. Cleary took locations, incidents, technical information, tone and a lot of other elements and ideas from the book and wove a thriller plot around them (very skilfully, to my mind).
And, whether they do or not, is it worth picking up?
I think so, yes - it's not Fleming's best book, by any means, but if you're a Fleming fan I think it's indispensable.
Glad you liked the article!
#14
Posted 09 March 2010 - 02:52 PM
I note as well - 'cos I though it would be interesting to monitor - than IFP have sold nearly 25% of their remaining stock of "The Diamond Smugglers" from their website since my cuppa spilling/magazine opening moment on Sunday...
Now, Jeremy, just let 'em publish your KKBB article on "Per Fine Ounce" in the national press and give IFP the nod that releasing THAT really would be a huge seller for their website.
#15
Posted 09 March 2010 - 03:36 PM
Brilliant work, Spy, and to get it inside the Sunday Times rather than sadly hidden away in a specıalıst Bond-fan publication. Almost made me spill my cuppa on Sunday morning, opening the Culture section...
I note as well - 'cos I though it would be interesting to monitor - than IFP have sold nearly 25% of their remaining stock of "The Diamond Smugglers" from their website since my cuppa spilling/magazine opening moment on Sunday...
Now, Jeremy, just let 'em publish your KKBB article on "Per Fine Ounce" in the national press and give IFP the nod that releasing THAT really would be a huge seller for their website.
Thanks very much, David - I'm delighted you appreciated it. I'm not sure anyone would be interested in running an article about the discovery of a few pages of a lost Bond novel in 2005 anymore - it's not exactly breaking news!
#16
Posted 09 March 2010 - 03:41 PM
Brilliant work, Spy, and to get it inside the Sunday Times rather than sadly hidden away in a specıalıst Bond-fan publication. Almost made me spill my cuppa on Sunday morning, opening the Culture section...
I note as well - 'cos I though it would be interesting to monitor - than IFP have sold nearly 25% of their remaining stock of "The Diamond Smugglers" from their website since my cuppa spilling/magazine opening moment on Sunday...
Now, Jeremy, just let 'em publish your KKBB article on "Per Fine Ounce" in the national press and give IFP the nod that releasing THAT really would be a huge seller for their website.
Thanks very much, David - I'm delighted you appreciated it. I'm not sure anyone would be interested in running an article about the discovery of a few pages of a lost Bond novel in 2005 anymore - it's not exactly breaking news!
Well, I've always hoped the background story in your article might shame IFP into publishing PFO (if it exists, of course!)if it got into the mainstream press.
Particularly if it was evidenced that your articles increased their on-line sales.
#17
Posted 09 March 2010 - 05:45 PM
#18
Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:11 PM
#19
Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:56 PM
#20
Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:38 PM
Here we are, every day babbling around on how much we all know on Bond and Fleming, and this guy manages to uncover a story of which the entire fan community didn't even have a clue.
Congrats on and many thanks for this wonderful article, Jeremy.
#21
Posted 09 March 2010 - 09:41 PM
Did you manage to tell Jon Cleary you had been successful in getting a copy of the script? He must have been chuffed. What an important part of Fleming history you have unearthed there!
Thanks. Yes, I had to get Jon Cleary's written permission to see his screenplay - he had simply forgotten that he had deposited it with the rest of his papers! He was a charming and witty man to talk to, and it was an honour to do so: he is now one of the world's most successful thriller-writers, having sold over eight million copies of his books. He won the Edgar in 1975 for Peter's Pence, and his latest, Morning's Gone, was published by Harper Collins in 2007 - that's his 51st novel. The very next thing he wrote after The Diamond Smugglers screenplay was the novel The High Commissioner, which introduced the character of Scobie Malone. It was made into a film in 1968, released under that title in the US and Nobody Runs Forever in the UK, with Rod Taylor and Christopher Plummer. Some of it was shot at Pinewood; Rank co-produced and co-distributed.
Congrats on and many thanks for this wonderful article, Jeremy.
Thank you, Heiko - much appreciated.
#22
Posted 10 March 2010 - 12:00 AM
Once again, forgive my mistake re: Bond as a character in the book.
I think I will order the book from IFP ASAP!
Bill
#23
Posted 13 March 2010 - 08:52 PM
#24
Posted 14 March 2010 - 09:37 AM
Briliant, thanks.