Who Was Responsible For Casino Royale's Critical Success?
#31
Posted 31 January 2010 - 04:36 AM
#32
Posted 31 January 2010 - 04:37 AM
What about this stinker he did in 2000:
http://www.rottentom...vertical_limit/
?
...or this one from 2003:
http://www.rottentom...beyond_borders/
It's even MORE of a stinker, with Angelina Jolie and Clive Owen.
It' got a big 14 (out of 100) on RT!
And the one that made us all fear in dread on CommanderBond.net the year in which he was announced as director:
http://www.rottentom...egend_of_zorro/
I don't know how many of you were on this site when that Zorro movie came out...but I can certainly tell you that many of us here were fearful that Campbell would make a total pig of it.
The combined Rotten Tomatoes scores of these three Campbell masterworks are LESS than what Quantum got!
Fancy that, eh?
The guy ought to feel lucky that Broccoli and Wilson and Fleming and Haggis and Craig came along and saved his sorry after the howlers he'd been making.
Campbell would be NOTHING without James Bond and Eon. NOTHING.
All he'd be left with are Vertical Limit, Beyond Borders and the Legend of Zorro!
He didn't even want Daniel Craig as James Bond.
Pathetic!
So his films outside of Bond are apparently . I haven't seen them. Maybe I'll like them. Maybe they're stories with superb direction. Sure, GoldenEye and Casino Royale aren't masterpieces, but GoldenEye is fairly well directed, and regardless of how much or how little involvement Campbell had, he still did a damn fine job with Casino Royale. And really, that's what's important. You could line up the finest actors alive and put them behind the strongest script ever written, but it wouldn't matter if you hired someone like Uwe Boll to direct. Even if Campbell had absolutely nothing to do with CR beyond the direction process (which I severely doubt), the man still deserves some credit for its success.
And so what if Craig wasn't his first choice? Maybe the person he wanted was better. Or maybe Craig is the wiser choice and it is Broccoli's push that got him. At the end of the day, what matters is there's a damn fine actor in the role. Whoever
made that choice is irrelevant. He's there now.
I also said that it's really precious to pan a film he didn't want to direct,
He also said CR left him exhausted, which I can believe. For one, the final product certainly seems like it took a damn lot of work. For two, I recall people saying in interviews that Campbell is a very dynamic, high-energy director. Production on Solace started pretty damn quickly after Royale. If Campbell exhausted himself working on CR, it's understandable he would want more time off than when Solace went into production, and I doubt he could have delayed filming by a year (filming on Edge of Darkness began one year and a day after filming began on Solace, according to Wikipedia, and unless he's done television in the meanwhile Campbell did nothing in 07).
Alright, I can dig the claims of Campbell being offered the gig just because that's how EON works. Maybe that's true. But personally I do think Campbell is a very good director -- not the greatest, but very good -- and the one of the only two worthwhile directors (along with Forster) to have done a Bond project since Brosnan began his run.
Only the craignotbond gang were concerned about Craig.
Not too long ago I found the thread where people were discussing the race for Bond 6, which was where CBn announced Craig. The archives tell a very different story, friend. Even some who are praising him now were either against or wary of the decision way back when.
He would be no more a prize asset than a reasonably competent James Bond helmer like Terrence Young
Oh come now, Young was certainly better than "reasonably competent".
I can respect that you're not overly fond of Campbell as a director. I can respect that you prefer Solace to Royale. But just as there are people to argue in favor of Brosnan when I'm there bashing him, I'm more than willing to argue in favor of Campbell and Royale.
#33
Posted 31 January 2010 - 04:49 AM
I also said that it's really precious to pan a film he didn't want to direct,
You know what's considerably more precious and petty? You're childish hatred of the guy, expressed here and my news thread about Campbell criticising your baby (QOS).
That is simply odd, no question about it.
#34
Posted 31 January 2010 - 06:36 AM