
That "oil girl" scene should never have been filmed!
#1
Posted 01 January 2010 - 11:44 AM
That scene completely kills the movie, very unoriginal and dour. If there were any way of redoing that scene I would really wish the film makers would maybe for the foreseeabale director's cut bluray or even perhaps just omit it.
What do you think?
#2
Posted 01 January 2010 - 12:16 PM
#3
Posted 01 January 2010 - 12:21 PM
This was just the most culpable.
#4
Posted 01 January 2010 - 12:24 PM
#5
Posted 01 January 2010 - 01:39 PM
#6
Posted 01 January 2010 - 02:20 PM
There were far more homages in Die Another Day than there ware in Quantum of Solace. The only obvious reference was the oil fields scene. Other than that, I can't think of any off the top of my head.
Well, DAD certainly has the good manners to chuck all its "homages" into the scenes around Q's lab.
QOS on the other hand, er, artisticly weaves them into the film's narrative.
The doorless car at the end of the pretitles referencing AVTAK?
The bodyguard falling off the roof AFTER BEING CLIPPED OFF BOND'S TIE!!!! I'm sure there's somthing similar in TSWLM...
From the same film, the walk from the desert, Bond in a suit, his leading lady in a black evening dress?
The freefall? All that's missing is Rog's blazer... and better filming, of course.
They're just from the top of my head.
#7
Posted 01 January 2010 - 02:23 PM
#8
Posted 01 January 2010 - 02:28 PM
There were far more homages in Die Another Day than there ware in Quantum of Solace. The only obvious reference was the oil fields scene. Other than that, I can't think of any off the top of my head.
Well, DAD certainly has the good manners to chuck all its "homages" into the scenes around Q's lab.
QOS on the other hand, er, artisticly weaves them into the film's narrative.
The doorless car at the end of the pretitles referencing AVTAK?
The bodyguard falling off the roof AFTER BEING CLIPPED OFF BOND'S TIE!!!! I'm sure there's somthing similar in TSWLM...
From the same film, the walk from the desert, Bond in a suit, his leading lady in a black evening dress?
The freefall? All that's missing is Rog's blazer... and better filming, of course.
They're just from the top of my head.
Ah but at-least they were beneficial to the plot, however slim it was.

#9
Posted 01 January 2010 - 03:48 PM
The oil scene itself I thought was clever enough, a great moment in the story, visually arresting, and all the while a snide little loaded statement about how our culture has changed since that first iconic moment.
#10
Posted 01 January 2010 - 03:57 PM
They put these 'homages' there because they know the vast majority of aficionados like us will go crazy to see them. It's always been this way. Given the standard the Craig films have set, the best they owe us is to try and make them work organically in an interesting way.
Well, this afficianado would just prefer it if they came up with something original.
Particularly if they're after the kind of praise Forster sought.
#11
Posted 01 January 2010 - 04:51 PM
#12
Posted 01 January 2010 - 05:29 PM
Well, this afficianado would just prefer it if they came up with something original.
Particularly if they're after the kind of praise Forster sought.
No doubt. It's a valid criticism of the film.
#13
Posted 01 January 2010 - 05:46 PM
#14
Posted 01 January 2010 - 06:27 PM
#15
Posted 01 January 2010 - 06:30 PM
#16
Posted 01 January 2010 - 06:30 PM
I, for one, also like the icons and formulaic traditions being turned on their head a little, so I appreciated the Golden Girl image made ugly and unglamorous, like death itself. Just worked for me, I suppose.
#17
Posted 01 January 2010 - 06:59 PM
Edited by byline, 01 January 2010 - 07:05 PM.
#18
Posted 01 January 2010 - 08:39 PM
That entire "golden girl" scene from goldfinger was pointlessly used in QOS. Why was it ever filmed for a rebooted Bond series? What was the reason for it?.Why did we need to be reminded that we were watching a Bond movie?
That scene completely kills the movie, very unoriginal and dour. If there were any way of redoing that scene I would really wish the film makers would maybe for the foreseeabale director's cut bluray or even perhaps just omit it.
What do you think?
I don't think that the scene had ruined the movie. But I am not fond it. I found it a bit irrevelant. Come to think of it, I might as well say the same about the Strawberry Fields character.
#19
Posted 01 January 2010 - 11:33 PM
#20
Posted 02 January 2010 - 12:53 AM
You're joking, right?I don't think that the oil scene should have been cut out at all. It's a great scene, and a much more effective scene than the on that it is an homage to.
#21
Posted 02 January 2010 - 01:25 AM
I personally like the idea of it, but it didn't have that same ''shocking'' feeling like the golden girl scene from Goldfinger. A closeup to Fields for instance might have made the scene more effective I think.
Edited by ChrissBond007, 02 January 2010 - 01:27 AM.
#22
Posted 02 January 2010 - 01:33 AM
They put these 'homages' there because they know the vast majority of aficionados like us will go crazy to see them. It's always been this way. Given the standard the Craig films have set, the best they owe us is to try and make them work organically in an interesting way.
Crazy about them in the wrong way. More like mad at them. I don't think most of us really care that much about obvious homages, especially since they don't add anything to the plot or narrative.
The oil scene itself I thought was clever enough, a great moment in the story, visually arresting, and all the while a snide little loaded statement about how our culture has changed since that first iconic moment.
We don't need to be reminded. We just have to turn on the daily news or put QOS into the DVD/blu ray player.
Bond doesn't need snide little loaded statements, especially Forster and Haggfish's kind.
I don't think that the oil scene should have been cut out at all. It's a great scene, and a much more effective scene than the on that it is an homage to.
The lack of John Barry's presence alone results in it being an inferior scene. Everything else including the camera-work, with perhaps the exception of the performances, detracts from the scene.
#23
Posted 02 January 2010 - 01:56 AM
Edited by BryanHerbert, 02 January 2010 - 01:57 AM.
#24
Posted 02 January 2010 - 03:02 AM
No, he is not. He is sharing his opinion. I don't share it, but I respect it nevertheless.You're joking, right?I don't think that the oil scene should have been cut out at all. It's a great scene, and a much more effective scene than the on that it is an homage to.
#25
Posted 02 January 2010 - 04:01 AM
#26
Posted 02 January 2010 - 04:26 AM
That's one post in September...one in November...and now one in January.
BORE!!!
I'll be back when there's some proper news to discuss.
Enjoy wasting your lives on pointless BS babble like this.
#27
Posted 02 January 2010 - 04:36 AM
#28
Posted 02 January 2010 - 04:47 AM
This thread shows precisely why these forums have become such a bore...and why this is only my third (cynical) post since the summer.
That's one post in September...one in November...and now one in January.
BORE!!!
I'll be back when there's some proper news to discuss.
Enjoy wasting your lives on pointless BS babble like this.
Thank you for your thoughtful and as ever pertinent views.
#29
Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:04 AM
#30
Posted 02 January 2010 - 11:51 AM