Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Have you ever started a Bond novel more than once...


48 replies to this topic

#1 Turn

Turn

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6837 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 22 November 2009 - 01:15 AM

I was going through my Bond paperbacks and noticed "No Deals Mr. Bond." I've owned this book for probably 20 years and read the first 2 or 3 chapters at least 4 times but never gotten any further.

I hate to admit I've never finished Dr. No. I always seem to end up where they get captured on Crab Key. Meanwhile I've read CR and a couple of others multiple times.

Anybody else have this happen?

#2 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 22 November 2009 - 01:31 AM

Yeah, Licence Renewed. To be honest, I find most Gardners a struggle to get into. Unlike Fleming, Gardner tends to deliver chapter after chapter of briefing scenes - the meat of his story doesn't usually begin until the second act, if you're lucky to make it that far.

That said, I've just started the much-maligned The Man From Barbarossa and I'm rather enjoying it so far.

#3 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 22 November 2009 - 02:44 AM

Devil May Care.

#4 Major Tallon

Major Tallon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2107 posts
  • Location:Mid-USA

Posted 22 November 2009 - 03:29 AM

Never. There are flaws in some of the books, but I enjoy them, one and all.

#5 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 22 November 2009 - 06:24 AM

The only Bond novel I've ever started and never finished was Devil May Care.

Sure there's been other's that I've started and didnt finish, but those were books I had already read previously.

#6 K1Bond007

K1Bond007

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4932 posts
  • Location:Illinois

Posted 22 November 2009 - 08:04 AM

Yeah, Licence Renewed. To be honest, I find most Gardners a struggle to get into. Unlike Fleming, Gardner tends to deliver chapter after chapter of briefing scenes - the meat of his story doesn't usually begin until the second act, if you're lucky to make it that far.


They're real drab. I have the same problem. The first few weren't so bad and then... I don't know.. it became a chore to read his Bond books.

#7 The Ghost Who Walks

The Ghost Who Walks

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 843 posts

Posted 22 November 2009 - 09:39 AM

I started Casino Royale as a twelve year old, but discovered I was simply not old enough to enjoy it. Then read it again some four years later. Loved it. Read it a second time when the movie came out. Loved it even more. I'm considering reading it for a third time before too long.

#8 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 22 November 2009 - 10:01 AM

They're real drab.

That they are. I just cannot be bothered with the majority of them.

#9 Roebuck

Roebuck

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1870 posts

Posted 22 November 2009 - 02:56 PM

The Man with the Golden Gun. All that malarkey with the cyanide gun before Bond finally sets off after Scaramanga drags on too long for my liking.

#10 Turn

Turn

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6837 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 22 November 2009 - 03:17 PM

I also have never finished Devil May Care. I bought it last year to go on a summer vacation, got maybe a third of the way through, lost interest and haven't picked it up since.

It's like if I want to read Fleming, I will read Fleming, not someone imitating him with what seem like unused ideas and way too much deja vu. Fleming's latter Bond novels seemed to progress into making you look forward to picking up the next one, whereas the early ones were basically stand-aloens. Devil May Care is like an earlier novel.

#11 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 22 November 2009 - 05:03 PM

I started Casino Royale as a twelve year old, but discovered I was simply not old enough to enjoy it. Then read it again some four years later. Loved it. Read it a second time when the movie came out. Loved it even more. I'm considering reading it for a third time before too long.

Me too I started it at 16 and couldn't get into it i read it at 20 and Loved it.

#12 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 22 November 2009 - 08:51 PM

I was going through my Bond paperbacks and noticed "No Deals Mr. Bond." I've owned this book for probably 20 years and read the first 2 or 3 chapters at least 4 times but never gotten any further.


LOL, I too struggled with that one. I got a few chapters in, and continuing was like struggling through quicksand. I did come back and finish it later just for completion's sake, I can barely even remember what it was about though. Bond goes to Ireland and Hong Kong? Or is that another book?

#13 terminus

terminus

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2469 posts
  • Location:Manchester, UK

Posted 22 November 2009 - 11:42 PM

Never had an issue with any of the Gardner or Benson novels, Devil May Care or any of the five Young Bonds, but I've never been able to read a Fleming novel all the way through except TMWTGG. I just find Fleming's style incredibly dry and boring.

#14 singleentendre

singleentendre

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 204 posts
  • Location:Tampa, FL

Posted 23 November 2009 - 08:59 PM

I could never finish Diamonds Are Forever. After the sheer joy that CR, LALD and especially MR were to read, DAF seemed so boring and uninspired.

#15 DouglasJ

DouglasJ

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 69 posts
  • Location:Aberdeen, Scotland

Posted 26 November 2009 - 02:59 PM

I can honestly say no. However, Icebreaker is a hell of a chore for me. I understand it's generally thought to be one of the better Gardner books, but in my attempt to read through them all this year (I did so last year as well) it was this one that stumped me.

Even Fleming's worst is always re-readable.

#16 Peckinpah1976

Peckinpah1976

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 351 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 26 November 2009 - 06:06 PM

Never had an issue with any of the Gardner or Benson novels, Devil May Care or any of the five Young Bonds, but I've never been able to read a Fleming novel all the way through except TMWTGG. I just find Fleming's style incredibly dry and boring.


Burn the heretic! B) :tdown:

Never tire of Fleming (or Higson) and once started I always finish them, a lot of the Gardner books I threw aside; never even tried Benson. Devil May Care was a disapointment but those who haven't finished it should give it another go as the middle third is really rather good (when the plot moves to Iran it becomes it's own thing and not merely a Fleming pastiche) only to lose it agan once Dr.Monkey-Claw's plan is revealed.

#17 Jaws0178

Jaws0178

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1612 posts
  • Location:Sioux Falls, Station SD

Posted 27 November 2009 - 02:46 AM

For some reason, I have the hardest time starting The Spy Who Loved Me. I'm not quite sure why though is the problem.

#18 codenamel

codenamel

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 46 posts

Posted 27 November 2009 - 07:02 AM

I think I first started reading the Signet edition of DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER around 1967. I wanted to like it because of the great cover and title, but the book seemed much too mundane for a Bond novel with nothing of the fantastic or sensual. It was more than 30 years before I finished this novel and today I can appreciate it for its facinating portrait of America in the 1950s and its noir, almost Chandleresque style. It now stands as one of my favorite Fleming efforts, but it took decades and multiple attempts to convince me of that.

I have never had a problem finishing any of the continuation novels. I remember really enjoying the first six John Gardner efforts and being slightly disappointed with the last eight. However as time passes, Gardner seems to be getting better and better for me and I am rereading many of his novels with a new appreciation. He was a highly underrated spy novelist, much better in my opinion than the more highly regarded Len Deighton. Never in the wildest dreams of my misspent youth did I dream that one day there would be 40 original novel-length James Bond adventures on my bookshelf by Fleming, Amis, Gardner, Benson, Higgins and Faulks. And I treasure them all.

#19 killkenny kid

killkenny kid

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6607 posts
  • Location:Albany, New York

Posted 27 November 2009 - 07:28 AM

For me isn't Colonel Sun. But, after three attempts I'm almost there. B)

#20 Tybre

Tybre

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3057 posts
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 27 November 2009 - 02:36 PM

Colonel Sun took me a while to get into. I didn't read chapter one, start over, etc. But yeah, it's slow going at first. Very well written and certainly entertaining as time goes on. But she's a slow starter, bless her.

#21 Turn

Turn

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6837 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 November 2009 - 02:57 PM

I can honestly say no. However, Icebreaker is a hell of a chore for me. I understand it's generally thought to be one of the better Gardner books, but in my attempt to read through them all this year (I did so last year as well) it was this one that stumped me.

Even Fleming's worst is always re-readable.

I also found Icebreaker to be rather plodding. It's all not so clever twists and betrayals and by the end predictable. I much prefer Nobody Lives Forever.

#22 OmarB

OmarB

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1151 posts
  • Location:Queens, NY, USA

Posted 27 November 2009 - 05:24 PM

For me it was Devil May Care. What a chore that was to get through. Took me a whole week of false starts and such.

I've never had a problem with Gardner's books. I love them almost as much and in a few rare cases more than Fleming's. Many people complain about the slowed pace of the later books like Man From Barbarossa, but I quite enjoy the later books, we saw someone take risks with Bond, grow him up.

Can't say I had a problem with any book other than DMC. All the authors were good and bad in their own ways. Benson I started out just not liking at all, but grew to enjoy them quite a bit.

#23 Perilagu Khan

Perilagu Khan

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 45 posts
  • Location:Pabco Gypsum

Posted 18 December 2009 - 02:53 PM

Only started and then stopped reading a Bond novel once. Before I had ever read a single Bond novel I picked up OHMSS, read a couple of pages, put it down, and didn't actually read the novel until several months later. Instead, YOLT turned out to be the first Bond novel I read in full.

#24 Ambler

Ambler

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 645 posts

Posted 18 December 2009 - 04:32 PM

Never happened with a Fleming. However, the only continuation novel I've finished was Colonel Sun.

I've thrown most of the others across the room, tho.

#25 Perilagu Khan

Perilagu Khan

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 45 posts
  • Location:Pabco Gypsum

Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:53 PM

I've thrown most of the others across the room, tho.


You've known them more intimately than I, then.

#26 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 18 December 2009 - 06:08 PM

I found the first chapters of Thunderball tough sledding when I was thirteen or fourteen. On my third try, once Bond was out of Shrublands, the story took off for me.

The only continuations that were disappointing for me were The Man From Barbarossa, Never Send Flowers, COLD, The Facts of Death, Doubleshot, The Man with the Red Tattoo and Devil May Care - the last one being the only one claiming to be written by someone as Ian Fleming. IFP should have resurrected the Robert Markham psuedonym for that one (although it would have been an insult to Kingsley Amis)

That said, my disappointment hasn't prevented me from rereading them occasionally.

#27 Dr.Fell

Dr.Fell

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 178 posts

Posted 07 January 2010 - 06:39 AM

Pretty much all James Gardner books I bought or borrowed from the library remained unfinished. I just find his work so boring and his Bond deprived of all of Fleming's qualities and left with just a grumpy facsimile.

I never finished Christopher Wood's The Spy Who Loved Me novel but only because I had such a terrible copy. I think it's actually better then any other continuation novel made afterwards.

I also never finished Devil May Care. After about the billionith past reference to a previous Fleming novel, I gave up.

Edited by Dr.Fell, 07 January 2010 - 06:43 AM.


#28 Walecs

Walecs

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 789 posts
  • Location:Italy

Posted 11 November 2013 - 05:53 PM

Devil May Care, Licence to Kill, Die Another Day. I picked them only to abandon them after few chapters. I had to force myself in order to complete the first two.



#29 glidrose

glidrose

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2469 posts

Posted 11 November 2013 - 11:46 PM

Possibly Thunderball, Death is Forever, Carte Blanche. Still don't know if I've ever read the first two in their entirety. Know for a fact that I didn't finish the third title.

 

Read the first couple of Benson books, but had to skim the rest. Also skimmed the first of the Westbrook Moneypenny Diaries.



#30 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 17 November 2013 - 09:44 PM

Yes.  The last two of the recent efforts, Devil May Care and Carte Blanche.  Tried exactly twice to make my way through both of them.  Couldn't do it, they were both terrible.  Haven't even bothered with Solo yet.