data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/842ec/842ecfc99e94fe34674c318b2eaaffcf61f63741" alt="Photo"
He should have
#1
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:39 PM
#2
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:51 PM
He then tried to drink motor oil, before being executed by his own people.
Additionally, Greene only gave Bond all the information he knew, because Bond promised to spare him. If Bond had killed him, he would have gone against his word. That's not in Bond's character and he knows Quantum will execute Greene anyway.
#3
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:08 PM
You make a good point but im so use seeing bond killing the villain at the end of every bond film. dont you think that every bond film should be like that?Don't you think it was one of the best villain deaths? Probably the slowest and most agonising. Greene was forced to walked for miles, through a baking hot desert, with an injured foot.
He then tried to drink motor oil, before being executed by his own people.
Additionally, Greene only gave Bond all the information he knew, because Bond promised to spare him. If Bond had killed him, he would have gone against his word. That's not in Bond's character and he knows Quantum will execute Greene anyway.
#4
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:11 PM
Shot Greene instead of letting him go. It ruined the ending for me
Just shooting him in the head? Now that, for me, would have ruined Quantum of Solace. It is infinitely more satisfying to picture Greene alone, hot, struggling to find some sort of shelter from the sun while he deals with the agony of wounds incurred at the hotel. To picture him staggering, half-alive through the sands, every so often pausing, looking down at the little can of motor oil...he knows it's going to kill him, but he's so thirsty...And then, at long last, a helicopter or a car arrives, and there is the faintest glimmer of hope...the logical portion of his brain snaps off, and the notion of being killed there and then is gone, and he believes that maybe, just maybe, he's going to be saved, be given a second chance...And that is when, no doubt in even worse pain from having drunk the oil and staggered this far, he is at long last delivered a bullet to the skull. That, monsieur, is much more satisfying, if you ask me.
#5
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:39 PM
Just shooting him in the head? Now that, for me, would have ruined Quantum of Solace. It is infinitely more satisfying to picture Greene alone, hot, struggling to find some sort of shelter from the sun while he deals with the agony of wounds incurred at the hotel. To picture him staggering, half-alive through the sands, every so often pausing, looking down at the little can of motor oil...he knows it's going to kill him, but he's so thirsty...And then, at long last, a helicopter or a car arrives, and there is the faintest glimmer of hope...
Yes that was fantastic, surely one of the best scenes in the film, starting with menacing whirling of the blades and the panning shot of the helicopter landing, with Greene finding himself at the end of Mr. White's pistol. What a brilliant scene. Pure Sergio Leone with a Forster touch of the lizard crawling across Greene's oil drenched body...
Oh yeah.. Sorry. That scene never existed. What a miscalculated and embarrassing cop-out.
Edited by The Shark, 02 November 2009 - 11:41 PM.
#6
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:42 PM
#7
Posted 03 November 2009 - 12:35 AM
You make a good point but im so use seeing bond killing the villain at the end of every bond film. dont you think that every bond film should be like that?Don't you think it was one of the best villain deaths? Probably the slowest and most agonising. Greene was forced to walked for miles, through a baking hot desert, with an injured foot.
He then tried to drink motor oil, before being executed by his own people.
Additionally, Greene only gave Bond all the information he knew, because Bond promised to spare him. If Bond had killed him, he would have gone against his word. That's not in Bond's character and he knows Quantum will execute Greene anyway.
Not really. You should remember that Bond does not kill the main villain in Thunderball, YOLT, OHMSS, Diamonds are Forever, For your Eyes Only or Casino Royale.
#8
Posted 03 November 2009 - 12:51 AM
You make a good point but im so use seeing bond killing the villain at the end of every bond film. dont you think that every bond film should be like that?Don't you think it was one of the best villain deaths? Probably the slowest and most agonising. Greene was forced to walked for miles, through a baking hot desert, with an injured foot.
He then tried to drink motor oil, before being executed by his own people.
Additionally, Greene only gave Bond all the information he knew, because Bond promised to spare him. If Bond had killed him, he would have gone against his word. That's not in Bond's character and he knows Quantum will execute Greene anyway.
Not really. You should remember that Bond does not kill the main villain in Thunderball, YOLT, OHMSS, Diamonds are Forever, For your Eyes Only or Casino Royale.
Agreed. Sadly the generation who grew up with the Brosnan films were so over-saturated with the "formula" that most of the true classics don't hold to if you look at them closely.
With many of the 60s Bonds, Bond hardly ever orders a Martini, says "Bond, James Bond", uses lots of gadgets or have a car chase or explosion every minute. Yet the Brosnan films ticked the boxes of the formula slaveishly in every possible way so that when it came to CR Brosnan fans were naturally upset.
#9
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:00 AM
Just shooting him in the head? Now that, for me, would have ruined Quantum of Solace. It is infinitely more satisfying to picture Greene alone, hot, struggling to find some sort of shelter from the sun while he deals with the agony of wounds incurred at the hotel. To picture him staggering, half-alive through the sands, every so often pausing, looking down at the little can of motor oil...he knows it's going to kill him, but he's so thirsty...And then, at long last, a helicopter or a car arrives, and there is the faintest glimmer of hope...
Yes that was fantastic, surely one of the best scenes in the film, starting with menacing whirling of the blades and the panning shot of the helicopter landing, with Greene finding himself at the end of Mr. White's pistol. What a brilliant scene. Pure Sergio Leone with a Forster touch of the lizard crawling across Greene's oil drenched body...
Oh yeah.. Sorry. That scene never existed. What a miscalculated and embarrassing cop-out.
A cop out, really? I think if anything people would have complained it was too similar to White executing Le Chiffre. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Though I gotta admit, you paint an interesting picture. I would have loved to see a scene like that play out.
#10
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:07 AM
Just shooting him in the head? Now that, for me, would have ruined Quantum of Solace. It is infinitely more satisfying to picture Greene alone, hot, struggling to find some sort of shelter from the sun while he deals with the agony of wounds incurred at the hotel. To picture him staggering, half-alive through the sands, every so often pausing, looking down at the little can of motor oil...he knows it's going to kill him, but he's so thirsty...And then, at long last, a helicopter or a car arrives, and there is the faintest glimmer of hope...
Yes that was fantastic, surely one of the best scenes in the film, starting with menacing whirling of the blades and the panning shot of the helicopter landing, with Greene finding himself at the end of Mr. White's pistol. What a brilliant scene. Pure Sergio Leone with a Forster touch of the lizard crawling across Greene's oil drenched body...
Oh yeah.. Sorry. That scene never existed. What a miscalculated and embarrassing cop-out.
A cop out, really? I think if anything people would have complained it was too similar to White executing Le Chiffre. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Though I gotta admit, you paint an interesting picture. I would have loved to see a scene like that play out.
Thanks! I agree it might have been too similar to the despatching of Le Chiffre in CR, though the way to avoid it would be to shoot in a completely different manner with lots of wide long takes and symbolism, more about suspense than anything else.
It would also be a nice pay-off for Greene's character along with the disappearance of Mr White for most of the film. Showing the dog-eat-dog mentality of Quantum and Greene's fall from power along with a parallel to CR.
#11
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:09 AM
You make a good point but im so use seeing bond killing the villain at the end of every bond film. dont you think that every bond film should be like that?
Why do what has been done before?
#12
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:33 AM
Shot Greene instead of letting him go. It ruined the ending for me
Nah, shooting him would just end it quick. Leaving him in a desert to die, his foot already destroyed? Slow and agonizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d516/3d5160d290f411434efb1c03f9ca58b079128956" alt="B)"
Brosnan would have shot him and made a quip. Ho-hum. Let's see, channelling the spirit of Purvis and Wade...
"Looks like you got your just "deserts", Dominic!"
#13
Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:33 AM
#14
Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:34 AM
#15
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:01 AM
#16
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:11 AM
#17
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:30 AM
If only we saw it.
Once again, I must disagree. In many cases, the imagination can be far better than the final product. And honestly people would be griping either way. "We should've seen it!" like they are now, or if we had "They should've done it this way!" or "They should've just alluded to it!"
#18
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:35 AM
If only we saw it.
Once again, I must disagree. In many cases, the imagination can be far better than the final product. And honestly people would be griping either way. "We should've seen it!" like they are now, or if we had "They should've done it this way!" or "They should've just alluded to it!"
In some cases yes, but since this is the final apex of the conflict between Greene and Bond, it would make more sense to show it than imply it.
A big miscalculation (and not the only one) on Forster's part.
#19
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:39 AM
Sort of like Bondian love scenes and why the love scene in DAD is just plain out of place. The tradition of leaving the lovers to the imagination is a sound one that has remained in this series for good reason. My favorite is still the segue from Bond and Miss Taro collapsing on the bed to the ceiling fan, then back to the relaxed couple some time later. Sometimes suggestion is just the best way to go.
Now, I'm not saying this particular use of suggestion over explicitness need continue for the main villains in the near future; we the audience gain satisfaction in seeing the appropriately gruesome end of Bond's customary nemesis. But it sure worked to an effective end this time, at least for me.
#20
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:44 AM
#21
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:24 AM
You do realise that he did die afterwards?Shot Greene instead of letting him go. It ruined the ending for me
In my opinion, it was executed perfectly and demonstrates a respect for the audience in that everything does not have to be spelled out and explicitly shown on screen. What purpose would it have served sticking a bullet in Greene's head right there and then? Less is more.
#22
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:26 AM
#23
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:27 AM
Nah. Just don't agree. Overkill, in my opinion. Greene's death is much more effective in the imagination.Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.
#24
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:38 AM
Nah. Just don't agree. Overkill, in my opinion. Greene's death is much more effective in the imagination.Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.
Yep you're right. The boat chase, plane chase, roof-top chase, car chase, and banana chase would played out much better that way.
Edited by The Shark, 03 November 2009 - 05:38 AM.
#25
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:41 AM
The subtlety of the banana chase in particular was top notch.Yep you're right. The boat chase, plane chase, roof-top chase, car chase, and banana chase would played out much better that way.Nah. Just don't agree. Overkill, in my opinion. Greene's death is much more effective in the imagination.Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.
#26
Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:08 AM
The banana chase, for sure.Nah. Just don't agree. Overkill, in my opinion. Greene's death is much more effective in the imagination.Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.
Yep you're right. The boat chase, plane chase, roof-top chase, car chase, and banana chase would played out much better that way.
In the present case, however, Greene's fate is verbally implicated when Bond explains to him that Quantum will be looking for him, and we know that he's right because they established that MO with Le Chiffre, eliminating untrustworthy operatives. We physically saw how they go about that, so it's unnecessary to see it again with a different victim. We thus already know that if Greene doesn't merely die of dehydration, he's doomed anyway. The shot of him as a tiny speck in the vast desert speaks volumes by itself, and hearing that Greene drank the oil and got it from Quantum is more satisfying than any redundant scene with White we could have watched happen after having Le Chiffre's execution and Bond's word to convince us that it was inevitable.
#27
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:17 PM
dont you think that every bond film should be like that?
No.
The ending is just fine as it is. It's one of the best endings in the entire series, if not the best ending.
#28
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:25 PM
Really? I like my films to follow the less is more mantra. Everything we needed to know was there. And after 22 films I think I know how these things pad out...Shot Greene instead of letting him go. It ruined the ending for me
#29
Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:27 PM
Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.
I couldn't disagree more. I'm not convinced the overt use of subtlety benefited the film as a whole, but it was a refreshing change and in this case, made for an exceptionally iconic (and oddly Flemingesque) ending.
And managed to be a rather charged political statement at the same time.
#30
Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:33 PM
But the case with Quantum (and even GREENE) is not closed yet. And SOLACE is about a different sort of closure - that of BOND himself. The story cannot and need not tidy itself up with blatant and dull images of GREENE downing oil. And why attach yet more hollow importance to that unecessary moment by using a "crane shot"?Not everything does of course, however this case DEMANDED a better closing scene for Greene. Even if it was a mere shot of him drinking the can of oil and collapsing, with an ascending crane shot finishing the deal.