Eva Green's role in Quantum of Solace
#1
Posted 19 August 2009 - 10:00 PM
I was looking at this photo taken from a Blu-ray QOS DVD, I always thought Vesper was photoshopped onto Yusef's photo, but it looks like Eva is really there. The way the hair falls and just the look of it.
Does this make eunice gayson and eva green the only Bond girls to do more then 1 movie?
#2
Posted 19 August 2009 - 10:05 PM
And why don't you count Maud Adams, who technically did 3 films?
#3
Posted 19 August 2009 - 10:08 PM
Anyway, yeah I think the photo was genuine.
Hah, this takes me back to 2007, where it was rumored that Vesper would appear in a pre-recorded video message.
#4
Posted 19 August 2009 - 10:50 PM
#5
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:02 PM
WEll no, all the girls who appeared in OHMSS don;t count as they just used footage that appeared from the movies they were in, Eva actually worked on QOS in some respects.
Good question. It seems that she did indeed "work" on QOS, simply by making herself available for a photo shoot.
#6
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:06 PM
#7
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:10 PM
I would've loved to have seen more of Eva in Quantum of Solace. Then I caught The Dreamers on TV, I was more than satisfied.
I love The Dreamers. Glad you saw it.
Was it horribly cut for TV, though?
#8
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:12 PM
#9
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:38 PM
Let me guess, you caught it on IFC? They showed everything on there, I think; I caught it a while back myself.Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
#10
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:41 PM
#11
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:45 PM
Even better...Channel 4, actually.
#12
Posted 19 August 2009 - 11:58 PM
Even better...Channel 4, actually.
Channel 4 was my favourite channel when I was 18.
#13
Posted 20 August 2009 - 02:36 AM
If only they had a zombified heavy breasted Vesper in QOS, I might actually re-watch it.
#14
Posted 20 August 2009 - 03:43 AM
#15
Posted 20 August 2009 - 05:10 AM
I guess I need to have an Eva Green film festival. She is one of my faves. What three films used Maud Adams? I'm too lazy to look it up on IMDB.
Well two should be rather obvious. She also had a cameo in AVTAK.
#16
Posted 20 August 2009 - 05:46 AM
Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
What an awkwardly disturbing thing to say.
#17
Posted 20 August 2009 - 07:28 AM
Thanks for that vomit-inducing post.Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
#18
Posted 20 August 2009 - 12:26 PM
xxx
#19
Posted 20 August 2009 - 12:53 PM
Thanks for that vomit-inducing post.Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
Clearly you have never seen the Dreamers
#20
Posted 20 August 2009 - 01:25 PM
Edited by Orion, 20 August 2009 - 01:26 PM.
#21
Posted 20 August 2009 - 04:00 PM
It's the boyfriends head thats Photoshopped, Not Green's. The original image is of her and Craig, it was a publicity shot for CR, i used to have it, but can't find it at the moment unfortunatly.
I...don't...think...so!
xxx
#22
Posted 20 August 2009 - 05:02 PM
I own it on DVD, actually.Thanks for that vomit-inducing post.Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
Clearly you have never seen the Dreamers
I just don't go around CBn advertising the fact that there are "semi-erect penises" in the film followed by icons. Not my style.
If you've seen the film, then you know the content. If you haven't, rent it. But I recommend fast-forwarding to the good parts because the film as a whole is a rather dull piece of art house garbage.
#23
Posted 20 August 2009 - 05:28 PM
I own it on DVD, actually.Thanks for that vomit-inducing post.Well put it this way, I saw Michael Pitt's semi-erect penis and Eva's Greene... so I don't think so.
Clearly you have never seen the Dreamers
I just don't go around CBn advertising the fact that there are "semi-erect penises" in the film followed by icons. Not my style.
If you've seen the film, then you know the content. If you haven't, rent it. But I recommend fast-forwarding to the good parts because the film as a whole is a rather dull piece of art house garbage.
I'm pretty sure the good parts are the only reason people watch the film
#24
Posted 21 August 2009 - 07:54 AM