Former James Bond star meets with staff to discuss the preservation of whales

Pierce Brosnan Makes A Trip To The White House
#1
Posted 19 May 2009 - 11:49 PM
#2
Posted 20 May 2009 - 12:50 AM
#3
Posted 20 May 2009 - 01:51 AM
Pierce looks pretty suave.
I watched the video and honestly, I thought he looked about 65.
#4
Posted 20 May 2009 - 02:18 AM
Pierce looks pretty suave.
I watched the video and honestly, I thought he looked about 65.
I commend his reason to be there though but he looked a little creaky but that's neither her nor there if the whales benefit.

#5
Posted 20 May 2009 - 02:21 AM
#6
Posted 20 May 2009 - 02:44 AM
wonder what the discussion turned to...
"So who do you think was the best bond?"
#7
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:02 AM

That makes me want to become a whaler just to spite the bastards that thought inviting Pierce Brosnan to the White House was a good idea.
Mr. Brosnan, I love your work but you sure know how to be irrelevant.

#8
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:05 AM
Amazing the doors that open when you've played James Bond. I can definitely see Pierce following in Roger's footsteps as a future envoy for UNICEF.
#9
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:13 AM
Sir Roger's humanitarian work benefits starving humans. Pierce Brosnan supports whales. There's a huge difference in importance and prestige.He's still got it!
Amazing the doors that open when you've played James Bond. I can definitely see Pierce following in Roger's footsteps as a future envoy for UNICEF.
#10
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:43 AM
This country is fighting two wars, trying to fix a severely damaged economy and Pierce Brosnan is at the White House talking about some
ing whales?
That makes me want to become a whaler just to spite the bastards that thought inviting Pierce Brosnan to the White House was a good idea.
Mr. Brosnan, I love your work but you sure know how to be irrelevant.
and you voted for Obama...
#11
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:43 AM
Sir Roger's humanitarian work benefits starving humans. Pierce Brosnan supports whales. There's a huge difference in importance and prestige.He's still got it!
Amazing the doors that open when you've played James Bond. I can definitely see Pierce following in Roger's footsteps as a future envoy for UNICEF.

Not that what Pierce is doing is bad, but there are certainly more pressing issues, Sir Roger's cause being one of them. Personally I'd rather save one dozen impoverished children than five dozen beluga. And of course there's the global economy. And the potential for a repeat of 1973 in the very near future. And the environment. And just all around issues. Really, when was the last time the world at least looked bright and cheery on the surface?
#12
Posted 20 May 2009 - 04:37 AM
Sir Roger's humanitarian work benefits starving humans. Pierce Brosnan supports whales. There's a huge difference in importance and prestige.He's still got it!
Amazing the doors that open when you've played James Bond. I can definitely see Pierce following in Roger's footsteps as a future envoy for UNICEF.
![]()
Not that what Pierce is doing is bad, but there are certainly more pressing issues, Sir Roger's cause being one of them. Personally I'd rather save one dozen impoverished children than five dozen beluga. And of course there's the global economy. And the potential for a repeat of 1973 in the very near future. And the environment. And just all around issues. Really, when was the last time the world at least looked bright and cheery on the surface?
Well put and let's not forget Craig and his latest part in that eco campaign. Of course he does a lot for charity as we have seen before (Unicef included)but I don't think we'll ever see him become really high profile on any of these though.
Publicly or not, at least some of these stars are doing something with true hearts and that is better than nothing.

#13
Posted 20 May 2009 - 04:44 AM
#14
Posted 20 May 2009 - 06:00 AM
Yes, sir, and I'm regretting the decision each and every day,This country is fighting two wars, trying to fix a severely damaged economy and Pierce Brosnan is at the White House talking about some
ing whales?
That makes me want to become a whaler just to spite the bastards that thought inviting Pierce Brosnan to the White House was a good idea.
Mr. Brosnan, I love your work but you sure know how to be irrelevant.
and you voted for Obama...
It's the price I pay for being gullible.

#15
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:29 AM
Pierce looks pretty suave.
I watched the video and honestly, I thought he looked about 65.
Well he just turned 56 (unless those secretly born two years earlier rumours are true) so he looks his age, just with the numbers in the wrong order.
#16
Posted 20 May 2009 - 02:55 PM
Yes. We. Can.
#17
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:19 PM
I'll have to watch the video as I made the suave comment based on the photo. I'm sure at 56 he looks a suave 65, though.Pierce looks pretty suave.
I watched the video and honestly, I thought he looked about 65.
#18
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:30 PM
#19
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:47 PM

#20
Posted 20 May 2009 - 10:19 PM
This country is fighting two wars, trying to fix a severely damaged economy and Pierce Brosnan is at the White House talking about some
ing whales?
That makes me want to become a whaler just to spite the bastards that thought inviting Pierce Brosnan to the White House was a good idea.
Mr. Brosnan, I love your work but you sure know how to be irrelevant.
C'mon, haven't you seen Star Trek IV????
#21
Posted 26 May 2009 - 04:23 AM
#22
Posted 26 May 2009 - 10:39 AM
#23
Posted 26 May 2009 - 10:29 PM
#24
Posted 27 May 2009 - 12:38 AM
The filanthropic Bond... following the steps of Sean and Roger. I'm glad.
What exactly has Sean done in the field of filanthropy (sic) ? Didn't he bugger off to the Bahamas to avoid paying taxes? (Not that I wouldn't do the same
