James Bond star briefly comments on his third 007 film
Dan seems to hint that Bond 23 will indeed be out in 2010.
Awesome!
http://img.metro.co......co.uk/e-metro
Page 7.
Posted 23 March 2009 - 09:06 PM
James Bond star briefly comments on his third 007 film
Posted 23 March 2009 - 09:14 PM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 09:33 PM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 10:09 PM
For the sake of argument, if BOND 23 started filming in late 2010 (i.e. next year), we would be unlikely to get the movie in theatres until October-November 2011.no i believe bond 23 will be filming in 2010 no wether it's spring 2010 or fall 2010 is another whole story.
this i feel belongs on the front page and I belive will get a final date for bond 23 soon (I'm putting the due date between November 2010 and may 2011 i don't think it's coming after that and bond 24 i'd say 2012 in november makes the most sense)
Posted 23 March 2009 - 10:15 PM
i suppose ur right but i feel we are getting closer to an announcment. May 2011 wouild be a nice change of pace.For the sake of argument, if BOND 23 started filming in late 2010 (i.e. next year), we would be unlikely to get the movie in theatres until October-November 2011.no i believe bond 23 will be filming in 2010 no wether it's spring 2010 or fall 2010 is another whole story.
this i feel belongs on the front page and I belive will get a final date for bond 23 soon (I'm putting the due date between November 2010 and may 2011 i don't think it's coming after that and bond 24 i'd say 2012 in november makes the most sense)
Posted 24 March 2009 - 08:39 AM
I doubt they'd want to put Bond against the summer blockbusters, I'd say March 2011 is more likely.i suppose ur right but i feel we are getting closer to an announcment. May 2011 wouild be a nice change of pace.For the sake of argument, if BOND 23 started filming in late 2010 (i.e. next year), we would be unlikely to get the movie in theatres until October-November 2011.no i believe bond 23 will be filming in 2010 no wether it's spring 2010 or fall 2010 is another whole story.
this i feel belongs on the front page and I belive will get a final date for bond 23 soon (I'm putting the due date between November 2010 and may 2011 i don't think it's coming after that and bond 24 i'd say 2012 in november makes the most sense)
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:32 AM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 03:52 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 04:09 PM
Why?Use this year to write the screenplay and casting and then start filming in January of 2010 for an Autumn release.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 05:54 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 05:57 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:04 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:09 PM
Because writing and redrafting a feature script takes a GREAT DEAL of time...believe me.Why?Use this year to write the screenplay and casting and then start filming in January of 2010 for an Autumn release.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:18 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:27 PM
Dan seems to hint that Bond 23 will indeed be out in 2010.
Awesome!
http://img.metro.co......co.uk/e-metro
Page 7.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:39 PM
Please, let Dench go.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:43 PM
Please, let Dench go.
For the love of all that is sane yes.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:50 PM
I doubt they'd want to put Bond against the summer blockbusters, I'd say March 2011 is more likely.i suppose ur right but i feel we are getting closer to an announcment. May 2011 wouild be a nice change of pace.For the sake of argument, if BOND 23 started filming in late 2010 (i.e. next year), we would be unlikely to get the movie in theatres until October-November 2011.no i believe bond 23 will be filming in 2010 no wether it's spring 2010 or fall 2010 is another whole story.
this i feel belongs on the front page and I belive will get a final date for bond 23 soon (I'm putting the due date between November 2010 and may 2011 i don't think it's coming after that and bond 24 i'd say 2012 in november makes the most sense)
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:16 PM
I doubt they'd want to put Bond against the summer blockbusters, I'd say March 2011 is more likely.i suppose ur right but i feel we are getting closer to an announcment. May 2011 wouild be a nice change of pace.For the sake of argument, if BOND 23 started filming in late 2010 (i.e. next year), we would be unlikely to get the movie in theatres until October-November 2011.no i believe bond 23 will be filming in 2010 no wether it's spring 2010 or fall 2010 is another whole story.
this i feel belongs on the front page and I belive will get a final date for bond 23 soon (I'm putting the due date between November 2010 and may 2011 i don't think it's coming after that and bond 24 i'd say 2012 in november makes the most sense)
March? Sounds unlikely, that's a bit off-season for blockbusters. Though I'm sure a Bond film would perform well whenever it was released, it would not get much weekday business if its released outside of the summer or end of year season.
While I'm used to the November release dates and the overall "Bond at Thanksgiving/Xmas" vibe, I don't think EON should be afraid of the summer anymore. Its been 20 years since LTK, I think everybody's over it now! When you can open a film to $67 million in November, it means you can play with the big boys, and summer has the advantage of bigger weekday attendance.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:47 PM
Because I think she is annoying and totally miscast as M.Please, let Dench go.
Why?
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:50 PM
Because I think she is annoying and totally miscast as M.Please, let Dench go.
Why?
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:55 PM
Agreed. Dench is a perfect M!!! I hope that she stays around for a little while longer...Because I think she is annoying and totally miscast as M.Please, let Dench go.
Why?
I completely disagree. I love her. Especially in the Craig films. She's a brillaint actress. The M for the modern age.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 10:59 PM
I have to agree. Not that I want Dench let go, she's a fine M, but let's pull her part way back. Like the old days, M is there to send Bond on his way and she maybe shows back up at the end...maybe. Dench has practically become a co-star, and the whole disapproving of Bond thing has really been done to death.Please, let Dench go.
For the love of all that is sane yes.
I don't mind her, but she had too much screentime in QoS (her scenes mostly felt more redunant in this film than in CR). I don't see the need for her having as big a part in Bond 23.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:04 PM
March? Sounds unlikely, that's a bit off-season for blockbusters.
Though I'm sure a Bond film would perform well whenever it was released, it would not get much weekday business if its released outside of the summer or end of year season.
While I'm used to the November release dates and the overall "Bond at Thanksgiving/Xmas" vibe, I don't think EON should be afraid of the summer anymore. Its been 20 years since LTK, I think everybody's over it now! When you can open a film to $67 million in November, it means you can play with the big boys, and summer has the advantage of bigger weekday attendance.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:47 PM
Exactly.I have to agree. Not that I want Dench let go, she's a fine M, but let's pull her part way back. Like the old days, M is there to send Bond on his way and she maybe shows back up at the end...maybe. Dench has practically become a co-star, and the whole disapproving of Bond thing has really been done to death.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 12:12 AM
It seems like Dench main purpose is to give the audience lengthy background information which is supposed to give all the action we just saw (or will see) some meaning. For instance; Elektra's kidnapping, Greene's death, the whole Vesper affair, Zao's terrorist attack etc. etc. I have always felt that this is a lazy kind of filmmaking. "Show, don't tell".I have to agree. Not that I want Dench let go, she's a fine M, but let's pull her part way back. Like the old days, M is there to send Bond on his way and she maybe shows back up at the end...maybe. Dench has practically become a co-star, and the whole disapproving of Bond thing has really been done to death.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 12:36 AM
bond 23will not be craigas last bond film where did u hear this or why did u think it?It seems like Dench main purpose is to give the audience lengthy background information which is supposed to give all the action we just saw (or will see) some meaning. For instance; Elektra's kidnapping, Greene's death, the whole Vesper affair, Zao's terrorist attack etc. etc. I have always felt that this is a lazy kind of filmmaking. "Show, don't tell".I have to agree. Not that I want Dench let go, she's a fine M, but let's pull her part way back. Like the old days, M is there to send Bond on his way and she maybe shows back up at the end...maybe. Dench has practically become a co-star, and the whole disapproving of Bond thing has really been done to death.
And M's constant mistrust in Bond has been used four films in a row. Dench plays it exactly the same in each new film. The outcome is always the same. I suppose Broccoli/Wilson thinks it is interesting to have a little journey going on between Bond and the female M. Ok. Fine. But why not try the same thing with Bond and the Main Villain for a change? Isn't that far more interesting from a dramatic point of view? I mean... they are trying to kill each other after all...
I assume that Bond 23 will be Craig's last film so it would be nice to have an older male M back again.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:23 AM
Um, yeah. I think that he's under contract for four...I assume that Bond 23 will be Craig's last film so it would be nice to have an older male M back again.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:25 AM
James Bond star briefly comments on his third 007 film
Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:42 AM