For Those That Didn't Like QoS, come in!
#871
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:00 PM
But that's just me
#872
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:02 PM
My personal opnion? This thread is no longer contributing anything worthwile to the board. Were I mod (and I was once, a long time ago on another board). I would probably lock the heck out of it.
But that's just me
It's not just you.
But then it's not just me.
It stays open as long as it remains on whatever sterile rubbishy topic of futile nonsense hatred it ever pretended to be.
#873
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:02 PM
I'm saying this seriously: Lock it.
#874
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:03 PM
#875
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:04 PM
For the love of mercy, Jim, lock it, or we'll lose our souls from all the vitriol.
I'm saying this seriously: Lock it.
You can tell he's serious...he's not using a smiley.
Just kidding mate
#876
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:12 PM
My personal opnion? This thread is no longer contributing anything worthwile to the board. Were I mod (and I was once, a long time ago on another board). I would probably lock the heck out of it.
But that's just me
It's not just you.
But then it's not just me.
It stays open as long as it remains on whatever sterile rubbishy topic of futile nonsense hatred it ever pretended to be.
May I echo Santa? I feel all warm and fuzzy inside to have you toying with us again like a bored tom cat playing with a half dead mouse. Or maybe I'm feeling like that because I'm watching The Aaprentice and it's great to see all that self-belief collapsing in front of the cameras yet again...
#877
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:13 PM
That my trademark, Jimmy?You can tell he's serious...he's not using a smiley.
Regardless, it seems there's only one way to stop this nonsensical bickering: Lock the thread.
#878
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:32 PM
If you're going to lock this, you should have locked the thread with QOS's Box Office Details, because in that one HildebrandRarity used a similar kind of epithets against his detractors.
Many of us have sustained heated dicussons in these threads, especially regarding QOS, but I think that the only person who have recurred to personal attacks- even if they aren't focused on one specific poster, but against anyone who disagree with his opinion- is HildebrandRarity.
#879
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:37 PM
#880
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:37 PM
#881
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:39 PM
Is this what you wanted, HildebrandRarity? I've been in your corner, but if you wanted this all to happen...
#882
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:42 PM
#883
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:44 PM
Oh and there we have it! Everyone cast their eyes on this jester! The Great Hildebrand Rarity who is obviously revelling in creating havoc on what was once was a happy and positive message board.
This thread was negative long before Hildy showed up in it. If anything I blame this thread for causing havoc on this board and not Hildy, who was merely responding to all the negativity.
#884
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:45 PM
Is this what you wanted, HildebrandRarity? I've been in your corner, but if you wanted this all to happen...
Sensualist likes to provoke.
If I shut this, what happens? CBn gets/continues the impression that it suppresses any anti-Mr Craig/Mr Craig's tenure commentary, when actually it's only anti-cretin.
To get thrice banned is some sort of achievement for Mr Tanveer, admittedly.
#885
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:45 PM
Well, perhaps you're right about that. But let's not say that many of us have descended on personal attacks, because that's far from the reality. Personally, I have had heated but civilized discussions with all of the posters, except for HildebrandRarity, and I don't think that I'm alone on this.You're forgetting Richard's attacks on Zorin, as have been documented earlier in this thread. Don't pretend Hildy's been the only one...Many of us have sustained heated dicussons in these threads, especially regarding QOS, but I think that the only person who have recurred to personal attacks- even if they aren't focused on one specific poster, but against anyone who disagree with his opinion- is HildebrandRarity.
#886
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:47 PM
#887
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:49 PM
#888
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:50 PM
Well, perhaps you're right about that. But let's not say that many of us have descended on personal attacks, because that's far from the reality. Personally, I have had heated but civilized discussions with all of the posters, except for HildebrandRarity, and I don't think that I'm alone on this.You're forgetting Richard's attacks on Zorin, as have been documented earlier in this thread. Don't pretend Hildy's been the only one...Many of us have sustained heated dicussons in these threads, especially regarding QOS, but I think that the only person who have recurred to personal attacks- even if they aren't focused on one specific poster, but against anyone who disagree with his opinion- is HildebrandRarity.
When more attention is being paid to the messengers than the message, something has gone very wrong.
This thread is closed. That doesn't mean that any critical threads cannot restart but some persons appear too thick to appreciate that one may criticise without abusing. Quantum of Solace is imperfect. We need not expose our own imperfections in so observing.