Who Should Direct Bond 23?
#1
Posted 30 November 2008 - 02:27 AM
#2
Posted 30 November 2008 - 02:47 AM
Rather I think that the best person to direct a Bond film would be Brad Bird - the director of The Incredibles. See the second half and tell me if it isn't a Bond flick (albeit with a family and kids involved).
Atleast the PTS of the movie would be great - as the Bearded One's later movies start great and end with a whimper (except Catch me, Munich, and Terminal).
#3
Posted 30 November 2008 - 03:47 AM
#4
Posted 30 November 2008 - 05:06 AM
#5
Posted 30 November 2008 - 09:17 AM
#6
Posted 30 November 2008 - 12:46 PM
If were dreaming **** up here, GIVE US CHRISTOPHER NOLAN!
Edited by Quincy, 30 November 2008 - 01:48 PM.
#7
Posted 30 November 2008 - 12:52 PM
I wouldn't want Spielberg now w/ the Craig era. I like the serious route their taking currently w/ CR and QOS. Spielberg would go over the top like Indiana Jones and incorporate the lairs, gadgets, abd crazy villains back into 007. Not what I want.
If were dreaming **** up her, GIVE US CHRISTOPHER NOLAN!
Agree on both. Although Spielberg's Munich is a bit of a more realistic fare, I think that he'd go the volcano lair-route (the early draft of Raiders of the Lost Ark had such type of finale, but remained unused due to budget constraints).
Having Chris Nolan would be amazing, considering his work on the Batman franchise (but he still needs to work on that action sequence-directing, since he doesn't use second unit directors).
#8
Posted 30 November 2008 - 01:47 PM
#9
Posted 01 December 2008 - 12:40 AM
#10
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:09 AM
Just one of a few directors who know how to shoot Craig with full effect.
#11
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:10 AM
Call it a hunch but I think Campbell will be begged back by Craig.
Just one of a few directors who know how to shoot Craig with full effect.
Hardly. Craig is a man who clearly likes to keep things fresh. He would want different directors to take the helm.
#12
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:15 AM
My take.
#13
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:16 AM
#14
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:18 AM
He may say that but at the end of the day, I feel Campbell might be back.
My take.
He is hardly going beg EON if Campbell returns. I don't know what makes you think he would be that desperate to want him back.
#15
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:24 AM
I personally think he will put what I think will be his last Bond film, into familiar hands. Just because Campbell would direct, doesn't mean it would be CR Mark 2...
God knows, I can't see Craig gambling with his third film..QoS might have taught him something I hope.
Anyway, what makes you so sure Craig won't? Because of what he's said?
Hardly concrete is it?
Well let's wait and see, simple.
#16
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:29 AM
When I say "beg" it is used in the loosest of terms.
I personally think he will put what I think will be his last Bond film, into familiar hands. Just because Campbell would direct, doesn't mean it would be CR Mark 2...
God knows, I can't see Craig gambling with his third film..QoS might have taught him something I hope.
Anyway, what makes you so sure Craig won't? Because of what he's said?
Hardly concrete is it?
Well let's wait and see, simple.
Since when has any Bond actor wanted a director to return ? And you hardly have any concrete any info yourself when I actually have heard stuff from Craig himself.
#17
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:34 AM
And just because a Bond actor hasnt asked a director to return doesnt mean it cant happen.
Although when I sleep with someone who works at EoN, I'll let you know the pillow talk ok?
#18
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:35 AM
That's right, that's why I said just a hunch..I am not going on anything Craig has said.
And just because a Bond actor hasnt asked a director to return doesnt mean it cant happen.
And I doubt even more so now since Craig and EON wants to stray away from formula as much as possible.
#19
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:37 AM
That's right, that's why I said just a hunch..I am not going on anything Craig has said.
And just because a Bond actor hasnt asked a director to return doesnt mean it cant happen.
And I doubt even more so now since Craig and EON wants to stray away from formula as much as possible.
Fair enough then.
Cheers
#20
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:47 AM
Spielberg has done all different types of movies. He could possibly do an over the top type Bond movie, but he has stated that he always prefered the early Connery type films. Remember not just Munich, but Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan, Jaws & Duel.
I previously posted that he'd probably go the volcano lair-route, but after reading an interview with either him or the Beard one (who seems to insist on going against what his fans want, just because), where it was mentioned that they were greatly impressed with the Bourne Ultimatum.
Love or loathe QOS, if an Ultimatum-like route was followed it would be worse.
But who knows... Well, as long as Mr. Lucas wouldn't be brought along I wouldn't panic. Immediately.
#21
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:55 AM
Hmm, who else could direct Craig and get the best out of him?
Buggered if I know.
#22
Posted 01 December 2008 - 02:13 AM
I know because QoS is REALLY Bombing at the box office right nowGod knows, I can't see Craig gambling with his third film..QoS might have taught him something I hope.
#23
Posted 01 December 2008 - 02:23 AM
Craig himself has said that box office numbers were not that meaningful to him (if we are going by the man's reported word)..
Can't a person post what he feels..it may be non-sensical to you but lets keep this a fairly open forum.
I respect your points of view entirely.
I just think differently.
Cheers and out.
#24
Posted 06 December 2008 - 03:49 AM
But otherwise, I would like to see J.J. Abrams.
#25
Posted 06 December 2008 - 03:56 AM
Oh, please no.But otherwise, I would like to see J.J. Abrams.
#26
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:01 AM
Oh, please no.But otherwise, I would like to see J.J. Abrams.
Only because I like Mission: Impossible 3. I liked the directing man.
#27
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:04 AM
#28
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:12 AM
M:I-3 was fine for what it was. I enjoyed it. But I don't really like the rest of Abrams' material, and I'd think the Craig era needs to aim higher.Only because I like Mission: Impossible 3. I liked the directing man.
#29
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:24 AM
On second thought he's too old and probably doesn't have any interest in living out of a suitcase for an entire year.
#30
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:52 AM
Rather I think that the best person to direct a Bond film would be Brad Bird - the director of The Incredibles. See the second half and tell me if it isn't a Bond flick (albeit with a family and kids involved).
I've been thinking for a while that Mr. Bird would be the ideal choice. Especially now, I kinda want to see a new Bond that takes all the best elements of the early Connery films. There was just a style those early films had, and I think Bird can easily bring that on board. Especially if you think about during the "golden age" of Bond, he was only around 10 years old, the ideal age to experience Bond and have all those fond memories. Plus, if they worry him being an "animation guy", he's currently working on 1906 (a live action film about the 1906 earthquake in Northern California), which should be good.
As for what a Spielberg directed Bond film would be like, with Quantum teaming up with aliens to take over the world and the only person who can stop them is Bond, working with an annoying kid that always gets in the way!