
How long did it actually take for Bond to track down White?
#1
Posted 19 November 2008 - 03:38 PM
Right, so how long did it actually take Bond to track White down. It really can't be two years, can it? Considering that Bond recieves Whites number in August 2006.
I would think it wouldn't of taken him that long, since Bond has his number. It's just really strange.
One possibility is that Vesper texted Bond 'Mr White' and the number underneath was Vespers, since it has a +44 infront of the number. A '+44' is added infront of a number when you recieve a text.
#2
Posted 19 November 2008 - 03:46 PM
#3
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:06 PM
The +44 at the beginning of White's number is the international country code for the UK. This means Mr. White has a UK phone number in the text, I believe.
So we have MI6 setting up an interrogation in Sienna. That would take time and planning. This is happening during the August, 2008 Palio.
In the real world of espionage, MI6 would tap that phone, listen in to see if they could find links to White's associates, track the movement of money through his accounts, do everything they could to unveil his network. Only failing that would they try to go on to foreign soil, shoot him and bring him in for questioning, and then only with greater evidence than that provided by Vesper.
So, yes, that could take two years.
keep dancing...
Read my QoS review: http://debrief.comma...showtopic=51624
#4
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:06 PM
#5
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:24 PM
A slight flaw is that the number isn't +44. This is the message in full from Vesper:One possibility is that Vesper texted Bond 'Mr White' and the number underneath was Vespers, since it has a +44 infront of the number. A '+44' is added infront of a number when you recieve a text.
04-Aug-06 16:38
For James:
Mr White
+3926222431
The actual dialling code (+39) is Italian.
#6
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:26 PM

#7
Posted 19 November 2008 - 10:22 PM
Soooooooo....

I don't think it would be that easy for Bond to find White just because he had a mobile phone number.
The guy certainly had plenty of disposable phones, and even if he has one he keeps all the time, I don't imagine giving this number to Vesper, who was just a small cog in a big machine.
#8
Posted 19 November 2008 - 10:27 PM

#9
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:26 AM
#10
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:29 AM
I think it's just a continuity error that they didn't see or bother to correct--the movies are supposed to be 10 minutes or so apart. The 2006 date on the phone and the 2008 date on the ticket are just from when the films were shot and whoever was responsible for inputing those for the films automatically or unconcernedly typed in the real life current dates.
Actually MGW said it was an hour. Anyway, we can't possibly believe M's office was redecorated in an hour either. I just don't think about it.
#11
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:37 AM
#12
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:42 AM
I use the gap before Casino Royale's final scene as a "two-year flash-forward", which explains the new-look MI6, and the 2008 ticket. Not sure if it's valid, but that's how I see it.
That is a plausiable explanation though I wish they indicated that it took two years to track down White in QOS.
#13
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:50 AM
Not only that, but Talamone - where Mathis was given his villa - is located in Tuscany, as is Siena. In fact, they're less than a hundred kilometres apart.
#14
Posted 20 November 2008 - 05:38 AM