

Quantum of Solace ending
#91
Posted 08 January 2009 - 08:29 AM

#92
Posted 08 January 2009 - 08:49 AM
Cue the gunbarrel circles. Perfect.
#93
Posted 08 January 2009 - 01:47 PM
Absolutely. I was struck by something else: Camille, the Canadian agent, has very little dialogue (only a whispered "thank you" as she leaves), but we see in her facial expressions, and so does Bond, everything that Vesper went through in the entirety of "Casino Royale": She starts out happily in love, then the shock sets in as she realizes she's been deceived, and we see fear, despair, shame and resignation overwhelm her, all in a few seconds. I thought that was absolutely brilliant.As 4 the ending scene. The most powerful part for me is definately the silent part when they just look at each other. Bond said just enough and there's no need for a lengthy dialogue or monologue from both of them. The viewer is given a chance to think it over for himself. That's what I probably love most about Qos is it's quite minimalistic and requires a viewer's ability to think and reflect.
Exactly. Stana Katic is a talented woman. Hope they bring Corinne back with Camille. That would be AWESOME!!!!
I don't know what you guys are smoking but you must have been hallucinating. There was nothing in that woman's performance at all that stood out, definately none of the emotions we are told about by the above poster.
As for "I never left" - corny, corny, corny and predictable exchange. What a cliched letdown of a final scene.
#94
Posted 08 January 2009 - 01:52 PM
#95
Posted 08 January 2009 - 01:57 PM
Absolutely. I was struck by something else: Camille, the Canadian agent, has very little dialogue (only a whispered "thank you" as she leaves), but we see in her facial expressions, and so does Bond, everything that Vesper went through in the entirety of "Casino Royale": She starts out happily in love, then the shock sets in as she realizes she's been deceived, and we see fear, despair, shame and resignation overwhelm her, all in a few seconds. I thought that was absolutely brilliant.As 4 the ending scene. The most powerful part for me is definately the silent part when they just look at each other. Bond said just enough and there's no need for a lengthy dialogue or monologue from both of them. The viewer is given a chance to think it over for himself. That's what I probably love most about Qos is it's quite minimalistic and requires a viewer's ability to think and reflect.
Exactly. Stana Katic is a talented woman. Hope they bring Corinne back with Camille. That would be AWESOME!!!!
I don't know what you guys are smoking but you must have been hallucinating. There was nothing in that woman's performance at all that stood out, definately none of the emotions we are told about by the above poster.
As for "I never left" - corny, corny, corny and predictable exchange. What a cliched letdown of a final scene.
Personally, I found it the most perfectly written, directed and - above all - acted ending of the series. But, again, the detail was in the subtext.
#96
Posted 08 January 2009 - 02:08 PM
Terrance Young and Martin Campbell got it right whereas Marc Forster has now joined John Glen in the group of directors who got it wrong.
Says who? Just because you don't like or get something doesn't mean it is wrong.
#97
Posted 08 January 2009 - 05:52 PM
Terrance Young and Martin Campbell got it right whereas Marc Forster has now joined John Glen in the group of directors who got it wrong.
Not to go to far off topic. But who says Glen got it wrong? Out of his five Bond films I can't say there's one that I really don't enjoy watching. I especially love both of the Dalton films.
#98
Posted 08 January 2009 - 07:20 PM
:::raises hand:::But who says Glen got it wrong?

#99
Posted 08 January 2009 - 07:51 PM
:::raises hand:::But who says Glen got it wrong?
I don't count steering Bond on film from the 1970's to the 1990's as "getting it wrong".... Bond could have floundered any time during the Moore / Dalton handover, the rise of the Hollywood action thriller and the MTV effect on popular culture.
#100
Posted 08 January 2009 - 07:56 PM
Lucas’ last three STAR WARS films carried the series into a land of invigorated popularity.:::raises hand:::But who says Glen got it wrong?
I don't count steering Bond on film from the 1970's to the 1990's as "getting it wrong".... Bond could have floundered any time during the Moore / Dalton handover, the rise of the Hollywood action thriller and the MTV effect on popular culture.
They were most successful. And they sucked.
#101
Posted 09 January 2009 - 05:50 AM
:::raises hand:::But who says Glen got it wrong?
Ok, but other than you.

#102
Posted 09 January 2009 - 07:41 AM
I don't think John Glen got Bond wrong. He did great by me, as has most of the 007 directors. But I do find that Marc Forster joined the ranks of Michael Apted in not getting Bond right (enough).Terrance Young and Martin Campbell got it right whereas Marc Forster has now joined John Glen in the group of directors who got it wrong.
Not to go to far off topic. But who says Glen got it wrong? Out of his five Bond films I can't say there's one that I really don't enjoy watching. I especially love both of the Dalton films.