Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

My Quantum of Solace review


18 replies to this topic

#1 JeffWest

JeffWest

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 37 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:47 PM

For what it's worth, I am a professional film critic and here is my review. I have some of the same complaints as Roger Ebert, but I'm also more forgiving. I gave it three stars out of four.

http://www.rottentom..._movie_together

We rejoin Daniel Craig's James Bond in "Quantum of Solace" with a car chase already in progress.

This is a bold move by director Marc Forster ("The Kite Runner") to grab the viewer by the throat and shove him into the passenger seat of Bond's Aston Martin as he rockets through the tunnels of Italy's Autostrada at about 150 mph. Do we need to know why those sleek Alfa Romeos are roaring after 007 with submachine guns blazing? Heck no, this is a Bond movie.

So, yes, give Forster points for his boldness. Then take them away because the car chase is a mind-scrambling, post-Bourne mess.

The individual shots of careening cars look terrific (they certainly do in the commercials) but editors Matt Chesse and Richard Pearson fail to assemble them into the coherent mini story that successful action sequences should be. It's all ZOOM ZOOM BANG BANG CRASH CRASH and just as you get a glimmer of what's going on, the chase ends without a climax.

The opening sequence summarizes everything right and wrong about "Quantum of Solace." The film is a series of bold moves by a director attempting to make an artistic James Bond movie. Half of these bold moves don't work, but the other half do.

Fortunately, while Forster dabbles in French New Wave jump cuts and "Godfather"-inspired montages of silent gunplay underscored by arias, Craig delivers a performance even more dynamic and decisive than his debut in "Casino Royale." With his cool blue-eyed gaze and assured athletic moves, Craig holds this insanely uneven movie together. His presence burnishes the stylistic experiments that work and alleviate those that fail.

Don't attempt to watch "Quantum" without seeing "Casino Royale," or the new film will make no sense. After rebooting the venerable series for the 21st century, "Casino Royale" ended with Craig finally saying, "My name is Bond, James Bond," as the familiar theme hit a crescendo and the credits rolled. At the time audiences assumed this signaled that the old James Bond was back, but it turns out Bond still has to work through some issues stemming from the death of Eva Green's character, Vesper, at the conclusion of "Royale." Wracked by guilt and tempted by revenge, Bond longs for that elusive quantum of solace (I applaud Forster for not explaining the title, which comes from one of Ian Fleming's short stories).

"Quantum," then, is the second half of a two-film origin story. As it begins, Bond and his chief, M (Judi Dench), learn that the organization pulling the strings behind "Royale" is more widespread and powerful than they imagined. Called Quantum (to at least partially justify the film's title), this secret society is devoted to overthrowing governments concerned with social welfare rather than corporate wealth. It is also a long-overdue successor to SPECTRE, which bedeviled Sean Connery once upon a time.

Screenwriters Neal Purvis and Robert Wade (first draft) and Paul Haggis (second draft) supply something akin to a traditional Bond plot. Dominic Greene (Matthieu Amalric), who heads Quantum's Latin American division, is spearheading a coup in Bolivia. His mistress, Camille (Olga Kurylenko), harbors a vendetta of her own and switches sides once Bond shows up.

The plot shatters traditions, too. Themes are unusually political, and unusually left-wing, for Bond. Satisfied that Greene will deliver Bolivia's oil rights to American corporations, the CIA signs off on the military coup and even offers to eliminate that pesky 007. This creates a crisis of conscience for CIA agent Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright), who befriended Bond in "Royale."

Bond is strangely detached from what normally would be the main plot. Determined to identify the man he holds responsible for Vesper's death, Bond is OK with preserving democracy in Bolivia, but it's an afterthought. Likewise, Greene is a weak villain because he is a functionary more than a criminal mastermind. It's like James Bond vs. Blofeld's accountant. And though Amalric is a fine actor, he is too slight to pose a threat to the muscular Craig.

Despite the focus on Bond's emotional turmoil, "Quantum" gives Craig little time to brood. At one hour and 46 minutes, this is the shortest Bond film. The pace is torrid and packed with action. While the opening car chase sputters, most of the set pieces are rousing, particularly a foot chase across the roofs of Siena, Italy, and a skydiving stunt that has been in and out of Bond scripts for two decades.

Choppy and idiosyncratic, "Quantum of Solace" will be remembered as the oddest of Bonds. It falls well short of "Casino Royale's" brilliance, but thanks to Craig's dominance it should hold up over the years in a way that Pierce Brosnan's movies have not.


Thanks for reading.

#2 doublenoughtspy

doublenoughtspy

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4122 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:52 PM

Nice review Jeff, thank you for sharing.

Kudos too for acknowledging the sky diving stunt as a piece that has been around in the Bond producers minds for quite a while. Some idiots in the IMDB are claiming it's a ripoff of Eraser.

#3 HildebrandRarity

HildebrandRarity

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4361 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:53 PM

Hey Jeff, you're one up on the Ebster! At least you didn't think PTS was a drive down from Nice through Monaco and down to Portofino! :(

Nice review.

#4 Mister E

Mister E

    Resigned

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPip
  • 2160 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:56 PM

Definetly one of the more balanced reviews. I guess I might be disappointed by things I was looking forward to but I still have high hopes.

#5 Bondian

Bondian

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8019 posts
  • Location:Soufend-On-Sea, Mate. England. UK.

Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:58 PM

Excellent review, mate. :(

#6 JeffWest

JeffWest

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 37 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:01 PM

Nice review Jeff, thank you for sharing.

Kudos too for acknowledging the sky diving stunt as a piece that has been around in the Bond producers minds for quite a while. Some idiots in the IMDB are claiming it's a ripoff of Eraser.


... which was a ripoff of "Moonraker." As was "Point Break," that Charlie Sheen movie, "Get Smart" (and "The Nude Bomb"). There are others I'm forgetting. It's a pretty long list, actually.

Edited by JeffWest, 13 November 2008 - 08:03 PM.


#7 Conlazmoodalbrocra

Conlazmoodalbrocra

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3546 posts
  • Location:Harrogate, England

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:10 PM

I must admit, the skydive was a low point for me (no pun intended)

#8 DR76

DR76

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1673 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:15 PM

It falls well short of "Casino Royale's" brilliance, but thanks to Craig's dominance it should hold up over the years in a way that Pierce Brosnan's movies have not.



I wouldn't shortchange Brosnan's films, if I were you. It's only been six years since his last film. I just watched "THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH" recently. And aside from the finale, I liked it a lot. In fact, I liked it more than I did when it was first released, nine years ago. I think that it's too early for anyone to make such a quick judgment on Brosnan's era.

#9 bond 16.05.72

bond 16.05.72

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:22 PM

Yeah I agree a nice balanced review, I can't get on board all this undulterated praise for QOS as I feel it did have flaws, I'd have loved it to be as good as Royale but I just think they needed to not lean on the Bourne style, I'd love to say it didn't but I can't say that.

I don't feel an utter disaster at all I think it would be top 5 but I wonder if that a case of both it's Craig's performance I love so much but also the fact some of the other entries are just god awful that it would rate so high.

I wasn't expecting to think this way but QOS was rather unfulfilling compared to CR for me and I would put OHMSS & FRWL ahead of it. I can't give the series the love I did when I was a kid because watching some of the RM films is pure embarassing and my feeling s on Brosnan's era are no secret.

The fact I'm not bothering with QOS for a 3rd viewing says somenting to me, CR was 3 times and could have been more but Cinema tickest aren't cheap these days. Maybe I'll warm to this more when the DVD drops but for now I can't help but feel I wasn't completely satisfied

I can't see myself agreeing with those who out right hate it and feel like it's not a Bond film but I can't get on the it's the best Bond yet train, I wonder if my 4/5 review might need to be reconsidered, maybe 3.5



It falls well short of "Casino Royale's" brilliance, but thanks to Craig's dominance it should hold up over the years in a way that Pierce Brosnan's movies have not.



I wouldn't shortchange Brosnan's films, if I were you. It's only been six years since his last film. I just watched "THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH" recently. And aside from the finale, I liked it a lot. In fact, I liked it more than I did when it was first released, nine years ago. I think that it's too early for anyone to make such a quick judgment on Brosnan's era.


Sorry but it just gets worse for me and I'm sure my re-appreciation of the Brosnan era will not be forthcoming, series low point for me and no number of years will change that and yes I saw them all on the big screen.

#10 JeffWest

JeffWest

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 37 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:30 PM

I wouldn't shortchange Brosnan's films, if I were you. It's only been six years since his last film. I just watched "THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH" recently. And aside from the finale, I liked it a lot. In fact, I liked it more than I did when it was first released, nine years ago. I think that it's too early for anyone to make such a quick judgment on Brosnan's era.


Sorry, but I despise "The World Is not Enough." It's at the bottom of my list. I'm more charitable towards "Die Another Day" than most people around here seem to be. First half is terrific, second half slips back into formula.

#11 doublenoughtspy

doublenoughtspy

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4122 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:31 PM

Sorry, but I despise "The World Is not Enough." It's at the bottom of my list. I'm more charitable towards "Die Another Day" than most people around here seem to be. First half is terrific, second half slips back into formula.


What do you feel are TWINE's worst qualities?

#12 bondrules

bondrules

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2190 posts
  • Location:America

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:35 PM

All Brosnan flicks make me cringe. But maybe that's just me.

#13 JeffWest

JeffWest

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 37 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:41 PM

What do you feel are TWINE's worst qualities?



Here's my review, if you wish to read it:

http://www.rottentom...vie_in_25_years

I just reread it, and the only thing I'd change is that instead of calling it the worst Bond movie in 25 years, I'd call it the worst Bond movie ever.

#14 bond 16.05.72

bond 16.05.72

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:49 PM

Sorry, but I despise "The World Is not Enough." It's at the bottom of my list. I'm more charitable towards "Die Another Day" than most people around here seem to be. First half is terrific, second half slips back into formula.


What do you feel are TWINE's worst qualities?


I used to think I hated TND more than TWINE but watching it again recently it's such an uneven mess, is it a serious type Bond or is it a Moore like joke fest, the action is rubbish, yes that over long PTS is boring, the swiss banker sequence is probabaly one of Brosnan's finest and the film starts on a promising note but when it becomes that bloated chase it puts me to sleep. The story never convinces and the climax is probabaly one of the most underwhelming of the series and don't start me on that Moore like rip off sign off with that smutty last line.

TND is crap but it makes it's point of being a SWLM rip off and doesn't try to be anything right up to it's Spy type clmax.

#15 Mister E

Mister E

    Resigned

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPip
  • 2160 posts

Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:51 PM

Sorry, but I despise "The World Is not Enough." It's at the bottom of my list. I'm more charitable towards "Die Another Day" than most people around here seem to be. First half is terrific, second half slips back into formula.


What do you feel are TWINE's worst qualities?


I used to think I hated TND more than TWINE but watching it again recently it's such an uneven mess, is it a serious type Bond or is it a Moore like joke fest, the action is rubbish, yes that over long PTS is boring, the swiss banker sequence is probabaly one of Brosnan's finest and the film starts on a promising note but when it becomes that bloated chase it puts me to sleep. The story never convinces and the climax is probabaly one of the most underwhelming of the series and don't start me on that Moore like rip off sign off with that smutty last line.

TND is crap but it makes it's point of being a SWLM rip off and doesn't try to be anything right up to it's Spy type clmax.



I agree. I also find TND at Brosnan's best while TWINE he was a girly man.

#16 JeffWest

JeffWest

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 37 posts

Posted 14 November 2008 - 10:13 PM

All Brosnan flicks make me cringe. But maybe that's just me.


Brosnan was just about the perfect actor for the role, but he got stuck with terrible scripts.

#17 bond 16.05.72

bond 16.05.72

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Posted 14 November 2008 - 11:15 PM

All Brosnan flicks make me cringe. But maybe that's just me.


Brosnan was just about the perfect actor for the role, but he got stuck with terrible scripts.


I keep hearing this from people but I don't think the scripts would have made much difference, his smug air just wound me up.

I just can't see Brosnan blowing us away like Craig and the whole Brosnan was a great Bond is a complete fallacy, he signed on and got payed, please lets stop making excuses for him have you seen those Loreal commercials he's done lately.

I think the idea of being Bond made people think he was going to be a great Bond but in reality looking like you might be Bond and actually playing him is 2 different things.

The look seems to have always been Pierce's most strongest attribute is actual delivery is flat and everytime he does the line it's like he expecting a round of applause.

Craig plays Bond like it's a acting job not like he's in awe of the role and that method works far more effectively than Brosnan's fan boy interpretation.

If QOS is as big as predicted and Craig does 2 or 3 more I think the opinion of Brosnan's Bond is just gonna get worse.

#18 Doctor Shatterhand

Doctor Shatterhand

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Location:Stafford, Virginia (near Washington, D.C.)

Posted 15 November 2008 - 12:26 AM

I guess that we would agree to disagree in this situation. I tend to fall on the side that QOS is 9 stars out of 10. I call it "an art house film with a budget". It truly is a work of art and like a Monet painting, you have to step back to see the whole picture.

Many have complained that the film is Jason Bourne, but I find the quick cuts and the chaotic fight scenes mirror the personality of OO7 at that particular moment. We are literally experiencing the dizzying peril that is happening to him. Note that during the final confrontation with Greene when Bond is close to dropping him from the catwalk, the camera is not as shakey nor is Bond out of control as he was with other unfortunate foes. The once ultra-violent, unconventional agent has come full circle as he realizes that there are other people in his life who need saving. Camille being one of them and thus Bond allows Greene a short opportunity to escape. He is not the 'cold inhuman killing machine' that dominated the first 2/3rds of the film. He has found purpose and refinement especially during the closing scene with Vesper's former lover.

I found the film refreshing and brilliant in an artistic way.

#19 Bradley De La Cloche

Bradley De La Cloche

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Jersey

Posted 15 November 2008 - 12:35 AM

I guess that we would agree to disagree in this situation. I tend to fall on the side that QOS is 9 stars out of 10. I call it "an art house film with a budget". It truly is a work of art and like a Monet painting, you have to step back to see the whole picture.

Many have complained that the film is Jason Bourne, but I find the quick cuts and the chaotic fight scenes mirror the personality of OO7 at that particular moment. We are literally experiencing the dizzying peril that is happening to him. Note that during the final confrontation with Greene when Bond is close to dropping him from the catwalk, the camera is not as shakey nor is Bond out of control as he was with other unfortunate foes. The once ultra-violent, unconventional agent has come full circle as he realizes that there are other people in his life who need saving. Camille being one of them and thus Bond allows Greene a short opportunity to escape. He is not the 'cold inhuman killing machine' that dominated the first 2/3rds of the film. He has found purpose and refinement especially during the closing scene with Vesper's former lover.

I found the film refreshing and brilliant in an artistic way.


Glad to hear you liked it, Doctor Shatterhand. :) :(

Edited by Bradley De La Cloche, 15 November 2008 - 12:37 AM.