by Milo Wakelin:
Quantum of Solace review - Bond is back with a vengeance
Milo Wakelin finds that revenge is a dish best served by Daniel Craig.
Bond is back with a vengeance in this gritty, witty, thrilling follow-up to Casino Royale (2006) which easily matches the high expectations set by its predecessor.
Known for the award-winning dramas Monster’s Ball (2001), Finding Neverland (2004) and The Kite Runner (2007), German-born director Marc Forster ensures that the 22nd Bond film is about far more than the contents of 007’s gadget drawer.
After his happiness was shattered by the events of Casino Royale, Bond is determined to seek a 'quantum of solace' - the scant comfort offered by revenge. Hard on the heels of a shadowy
international organisation, he crosses paths with Camille (Olga Kurylenko) a mysterious young woman who has her own score to settle.
This time round, the role of Bond villain is relished by acclaimed French actor Mathieu Amalric (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, 2007), who portrays nefarious eco-philanthropist Dominic Greene with all the air of a psychotic Claude Rains. Grinning like a malevolent toad, Greene unfolds a scheme to seize hundreds of square miles of seemingly empty Bolivian desert and depose the country’s leaders – and Bond is the only one standing in his way.
True to form, Daniel Craig delivers another muscular performance which threatens to eclipse Sean Connery’s turn as Ian Fleming’s ruthless assassin; Judi Dench – who has become something of a Bond institution in her own right - reprises her role as M16’s vigilant spymistress. In the absence of a Moneypenny, M seems to have become Bond’s confidante as well as his keeper, and their relationship now exhibits a frisson that would have made even Fleming (and Freud) blush.
Fleming created James Bond in an age where jet travel was a luxury, and the world of concierges and casinos, maître d's and martinis stood in stark contrast to the austerity of the post-war years. Shot on location in Austria, Spain, Mexico, Italy, Chile and Panama, Quantum of Solace has the feel of a glossy travelogue - one which offers some spectacular backdrops to the requisite action sequences - including a chase set in Bregenz open-air Opera house that must count among the high-points of the entire Bond franchise.
Classy, kinetic and supremely entertaining, this superlative sequel is well worth putting on a dinner jacket for.
source: http://www.moviemail...k/news/news=713

Very positive MovieMail review
Started by
Invincible1958
, Oct 23 2008 05:14 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 October 2008 - 05:14 PM
#2
Posted 23 October 2008 - 05:29 PM
Hey, does this guy go into the Rotten Tomatoes dish? 
If so, are we up to 86 percent fresh yet?

If so, are we up to 86 percent fresh yet?

#3
Posted 23 October 2008 - 05:50 PM
The film is going to have a very good tomatoemeter score as most films seem to be saying that the film is more positive than negative, but the film's average score will probably be around 7.3-7.5 based on what we've seen.
#4
Posted 23 October 2008 - 06:16 PM
I am not starting a new thread for this, since I am not sure, its not already hidden somewhere. But this is itneresting. Its a Q&A with DC
Here’s one from Charlie Higson, author of the ‘Young Bond’ books: How much of Fleming’s Bond is there in Craig’s Bond?
‘I hope a lot, but it’s subliminal. It’s about reading the books. What I wanted to do with “Quantum of Solace” – and what Marc wanted to do – was to draw on Fleming’s obsession with detail. He has two pages to describe making scrambled egg. Marc wanted to turn that into cinematic detail, so that just looking at the frame is sumptuous.
I spoke to Marc Forster recently and he kept stressing the importance of character in this new film. Was that key?
‘I think so. Marc’s Swiss – I mean this in the best way – he’s very fastidious, very organised, which are qualities that lend themselves to a Bond movie. There’s an efficiency that you need. I think my Bond is quite efficient, but ragged, if that makes sense. He efficiently kills people but everything blows up around him. I can’t sing Marc’s praises highly enough, he’s a good man.’
http://www.timeout.c...-interview.html
Here’s one from Charlie Higson, author of the ‘Young Bond’ books: How much of Fleming’s Bond is there in Craig’s Bond?
‘I hope a lot, but it’s subliminal. It’s about reading the books. What I wanted to do with “Quantum of Solace” – and what Marc wanted to do – was to draw on Fleming’s obsession with detail. He has two pages to describe making scrambled egg. Marc wanted to turn that into cinematic detail, so that just looking at the frame is sumptuous.
I spoke to Marc Forster recently and he kept stressing the importance of character in this new film. Was that key?
‘I think so. Marc’s Swiss – I mean this in the best way – he’s very fastidious, very organised, which are qualities that lend themselves to a Bond movie. There’s an efficiency that you need. I think my Bond is quite efficient, but ragged, if that makes sense. He efficiently kills people but everything blows up around him. I can’t sing Marc’s praises highly enough, he’s a good man.’
http://www.timeout.c...-interview.html
#5
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:39 PM
Movie Mail has gone ahead and put together their list of the Top 5 Bond entries...
http://www.moviemail...n.pl?collID=526
http://www.moviemail...n.pl?collID=526