
I'm looking forward to Davi as a terrorist and Bill O'Reilly's cameo.
Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:40 AM
Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:46 AM
Posted 27 August 2008 - 01:32 AM
Posted 27 August 2008 - 03:43 AM
Posted 05 September 2008 - 08:18 AM
Posted 05 September 2008 - 11:15 AM
Posted 05 September 2008 - 12:55 PM
Posted 05 September 2008 - 02:52 PM
It looks mildly amusing, but giving a part to Bill O'Reilly was a huge mistake, and I think accepting it was also a mistake on his part. How can he claim to be in any way neutral now?
Posted 05 September 2008 - 04:42 PM
Posted 05 September 2008 - 06:23 PM
Posted 06 September 2008 - 02:46 PM
Posted 06 September 2008 - 03:04 PM
Hopefully not.I wonder if it will reach the UK.
Posted 06 September 2008 - 06:53 PM
Did anybody else notice that Robert Davi narrated the McCain bio montage at the Republican National Convention last night?
Posted 06 September 2008 - 07:22 PM
The usual quip about nobody remembering the Dalton years comes to mind.Did anybody else notice that Robert Davi narrated the McCain bio montage at the Republican National Convention last night?
Yeah...I'm surprised the media hasn't flipped out about it - "OMG McCain had a Bond villain introducing him!"
Posted 02 October 2008 - 10:50 PM
Posted 04 October 2008 - 03:16 AM
This looks hilarious!
I'm looking forward to Davi as a terrorist and Bill O'Reilly's cameo.
Uh....eh....look, I'm a neo-con, and even I find parts of this trailer awful. But we'll see. Maybe it'll be good.
Interestingly, David Zucker started off as a Democrat decades ago, and gradually became a Republican (well, by gradually I think after 9/11 he made the switch according to some recent interviews that he's done).
His early work on Airplane, Top Secret, and The Naked Gun films all had jokes about the Republicans. But even when he was gently ribbing the Republicans, he was also spoofing Democrats. Zucker was an equal-opportunity satirist. One of my favorite lines ever in any of the ZAZ films was from Top Secret, when Hillary tells Nick she had an Uncle that was an American but 'he was one of the lucky ones. He escaped by hot air balloon during the Carter administration'.
Edited by A Kristatos, 04 October 2008 - 03:20 AM.
Posted 05 October 2008 - 04:41 AM
Posted 06 October 2008 - 02:44 PM
Posted 08 October 2008 - 03:21 AM
I think this movie is a big mistake. You don't want directors attacking other directors over political positions as "comedy."
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:35 AM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 02:55 AM
Now I haven't seen it, so I can't be sure, but I think part of the reason it's bombed is that from the trailers and pre-release hype it seems to suggest (through hilarious comedy) that the only decent people are fiercely patriotic Americans who are pro-WOT. That's alienating a huge chunk of people there.
It bombed because the televison spots for the movie made it look awful. Whether it's actually any good is a different matter. A lot of tv spots ran on FOX-News, but it's a mistake to think that everybody that watches FOX News is a conservative. Probably half the viewers watch it because they hate the network. The network did its share of trying to plug the movie, but the distributor didn't pre-screen the film for critics, which is usually a sign that a film is no good. And though it was stacked with conservative talent in front and behind the camera, it's also another mistake to assume that conservatives will just go see any movie out there that reflects their beliefs.
Edited by A Kristatos, 09 October 2008 - 02:57 AM.
Posted 09 October 2008 - 08:06 AM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 01:01 PM
I think this movie is a big mistake. You don't want directors attacking other directors over political positions as "comedy."
Why not? Just because he is a director, does that not give him the right to make a movie stating his own political beliefs? The real Michael Moore and Oliver Stone do it all the time. Besides, I think Zucker has been around long enough to make a political spoof even if many in Hollywood disagree with him.
Edited by Stephen Spotswood, 09 October 2008 - 01:07 PM.
Posted 13 October 2008 - 05:23 PM
Edited by Stephen Spotswood, 13 October 2008 - 05:24 PM.
Posted 13 October 2008 - 06:17 PM
Thank God.I was just checking the weekend box office today, and I'm happy to announce that American Carol is a bomb.
It cost 20-23 million dollars to make, and has only made a little over 6 million back.
Bill Maher's Religulous by comparison made a little less, still at least 6 million, but only had a budget of 2 million dollars, so it's 4 million in the black already, and making over $950.00 per screen.
Posted 15 October 2008 - 06:59 PM
Thank God.I was just checking the weekend box office today, and I'm happy to announce that American Carol is a bomb.
It cost 20-23 million dollars to make, and has only made a little over 6 million back.
Bill Maher's Religulous by comparison made a little less, still at least 6 million, but only had a budget of 2 million dollars, so it's 4 million in the black already, and making over $950.00 per screen.
LOL! Does anyone else see the irony of Sark thanking God for Religulous being more profitable than An American Carol?
Posted 15 October 2008 - 07:18 PM
Posted 15 October 2008 - 11:21 PM
Posted 16 October 2008 - 03:10 PM
I thought it went without saying.
Like when George Bernard Shaw was at a dinner party, and the conversation turned toward religion. One elderly dowager asked him what religion he is, and he responded, "Madam, I am an atheist, and I thank God for it."
Perhaps it was better left unsaid. Like when you blow your nose into a tissue, then you put the tissue into your purse but forget that you left it in there, and then later you reach into your purse for something and your hand brushes up against the tissue and gets dirty.
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:42 PM
Anyone know where I can rent a hot air balloon? I may need to escape to Cuba if Obama becomes President.