what will happen if the Queen dies
#1
Posted 20 September 2002 - 09:36 PM
#2
Posted 20 September 2002 - 09:47 PM
#3
Posted 20 September 2002 - 09:58 PM
#4
Posted 20 September 2002 - 10:21 PM
Or do you mean MI6 aka 'Her Majesty's Secret Service'. Since this is, as far as I know, an unofficial title, it would just change to 'His' (which it would if it were official). I've heard 'Her(His) Majesty's Service' to refer to civil employees. 'Her(His) Majesty's Forces' refer to the army, navy, air force and other military groups.
#5
Posted 21 September 2002 - 01:47 AM
#6
Posted 21 September 2002 - 01:50 AM
#7
Posted 21 September 2002 - 07:25 PM
#8
Posted 22 September 2002 - 03:41 PM
#9
Posted 22 September 2002 - 07:27 PM
#10
Posted 26 September 2002 - 12:33 AM
#11
Posted 26 September 2002 - 12:49 AM
Originally posted by Loomis
As far as I can remember, Her Majesty has never even been mentioned in a Bond film.
Well, there is the scene in OHMSS, where Bond is in his office and he raises a glass to a portrait of the Queen.
#12
Posted 26 September 2002 - 01:32 AM
Would that count?
#13
Posted 26 September 2002 - 02:16 AM
#14
Posted 26 September 2002 - 06:30 AM
#15
Posted 26 September 2002 - 07:28 AM
Although, that said, The Prince of Wales has threatened this week that if his future subjects/objects (we are not citizens) don't start listening to his valid opinions about humanely running an animal to exhaustion and then having it torn apart, or his view on...I dunno..hedgrows or some such bumpkinry, then he'll leave the country and spend the rest of his life skiing.
Off you go, then.
(And no mockery from the Australian "corner"; you lot actually voted to keep this bunch of inbred cretins in charge of you. What was that about then?)
#16
Posted 26 September 2002 - 07:46 AM
Originally posted by Jim
(And no mockery from the Australian "corner"; you lot actually voted to keep this bunch of inbred cretins in charge of you. What was that about then?)
most people wanted to become a republic, we voted no on the way the government was going to go about it.
basically (if anybody cares) the president wouldnt do anything and the prime minister would still be in charge, and the public doesnt even get a say who the president would be. thats why most people voted no.
#17
Posted 26 September 2002 - 07:54 AM
#18
Posted 06 October 2002 - 10:47 PM
As for when the Queen goes to the great throne in the sky, Bond won't be affected.
Unless we have a plot revealing that Charles III is a puppet clone controlled by an evil mastermind out to usurp a... er... minor European island.
#19
Posted 30 October 2002 - 06:06 PM
#20
Posted 04 November 2002 - 01:45 AM
Bond just moves with the times.
#21
Posted 04 November 2002 - 10:57 AM
Originally posted by Jim
(And no mockery from the Australian "corner"; you lot actually voted to keep this bunch of inbred cretins in charge of you. What was that about then?)
Phht. Your kidding aren't you? Don't tell me you've never experienced Aussie humour?
Of course we need someone to laugh at and take the piss out of while sending all the lousy beer there and keeping all the good stuff here for ourselves.
#22
Posted 04 November 2002 - 06:55 PM
Someone change the idiotic title of this thread to Australia Vs England or something.
#23
Posted 04 November 2002 - 10:20 PM
#24
Posted 05 November 2002 - 07:08 PM
#25
Posted 05 November 2002 - 08:28 PM
#26
Posted 12 November 2002 - 11:15 PM
#27
Posted 13 November 2002 - 03:34 AM
#28
Posted 01 December 2002 - 05:20 AM
But all mockery aside, I hope at least Canada does not become a republic. I hate the idea of spending millions of taxes on electing a jerk who does the same thing that a king does but without gold-covered vehicles. And we in Canada (and the rest of the Commonwealth) get to oh and ah at whatever show the Royal family puts on, but we don't have to pay! That's what Britain gets for colonising the world...
#29
Posted 10 December 2002 - 08:40 PM
#30
Posted 10 December 2002 - 08:42 PM