Licence to Kill
#31
Posted 16 July 2008 - 12:44 PM
John Glen also gets a lot of stick, but this is another thing I can't understand. He was a thoroughly good director, and versatile. Licence To Kill is very different from For Your Eyes Only, yet both films really satisfy me as a Bond fan. The fact that he was brave enough to direct a film with so much more violence than he was used to including should be commended. The scene where Krest's head explodes sums this up! It's scenes like this that make the film more realistic, something which the series needed more of. Now with Daniel Craig, it looks like this is going to be a permanent feature of the series, thank God!
The tanker chase for me is the best part of the film. It's a chse with a difference, we'd never seen Bond use this kind of vehicle before and it was refreshing to see him in a more challenging driving situation than usual.
I liked seeing Hedison return as Felix, as well as seeing Q get a much bigger role in the action, rather than just presenting Bond wih his latest gadgets. Maybe Hedison should have played Felix in The Living Daylights as well, to really achieve some continuation in the role. It's surprising that this next film will be the first time Felix has appeared in two consecutive Bond movies played by the same actor. As for Q, it was equally alarming that 27 years into the series' run, this was the first time Q really had anything significant to do other than hand over gadgets. Sadly, this would be the first and last time such a role was granted to Desmond Llewelyn.
I think Gabriel summed it up perfectly that Licence To Kill was a great one-off for the Bond films, but hopeflly, it won't be a one-off for much longer! Who knows, Bond 23 may go back to these elements, I bloody hope so! It's a shame Dalton only did 2 films, but it was one hell of a send-off! Long live Timothy Dalton and long live Licence To Kill!
#32
Posted 16 July 2008 - 01:42 PM
LMAO I've always wondered about that scene...
James Bond: Then you have my resignation, sir!
M: [incensed] We're not a country club, 007!
[pause]
M: Effective immediately, your licence to kill is revoked, and I require you to hand over your weapon. Now. I need hardly remind you that you're still bound by the Official Secrets Act.
Why change his mind in a split second and revoke his licence to kill?
He didn't change his mind- he is just shocked that Bond resigned, so it took M a second to recover.
BTW- my favorite scene in my 2nd favotite Bond film!
#33
Posted 16 July 2008 - 02:18 PM
I always took it to mean that he'd rather fire Bond than have him resign (it's like when your boss tells you he's letting you go, but instead you flip him off and tell him he can't do that because you've just quit... it's a matter of principle) and/or that he was simply demoting him back to ordinary agent status (which Bernard Lee's M threatened to do to Bond in Dr. No).Why change his mind in a split second and revoke his licence to kill?
#34
Posted 16 July 2008 - 03:47 PM
#35
Posted 16 July 2008 - 05:12 PM
Good point. If Hedison had appeared in "The Living Daylights" (and if he'd had more time to work on his "Licence to Kill" script), then I think I'd feel very differently about him returning to the role.Maybe Hedison should have played Felix in The Living Daylights as well, to really achieve some continuation in the role.
#36
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:10 PM
Basing this entirely on "Licence to Kill," I would agree with you wholeheartedly. And, truth be told, I'd assumed that "Licence to Kill" probably put to rest any acting aspirations she might have had. However, hubby and I watched a 2001 film we'd taped last week called PiƱero. The first time I saw her, I asked, "Is that Lupe from 'Licence to Kill'"? Turns out it was. Benjamin Bratt turned in a pretty amazing performance, and believe it or not, she was pretty darned good, herself. She is still quite beautiful -- more beautiful now, IMO, than she was in "Licence to Kill" -- and she and Bratt are a couple. Turns out they're both far more than pretty faces. I watched "The Cleaner" last week and was actually impressed by Bratt. Back in his "Law & Order" days, I thought he was good, but was hired more for his looks than his acting skills. He's a better actor than I'd given him credit for.I don't like any of the above. The locations are among the blandest in franchise history (only to be out-done by the Brosnan era), the score is wholly uninteresting and rather dated, and Talisa Soto couldn't act her way out of a paper bag (attractive, though).
Edited by byline, 22 July 2008 - 09:11 PM.
#37
Posted 23 July 2008 - 02:25 PM
"Bless you."
#38
Posted 23 July 2008 - 04:22 PM
#39
Posted 23 July 2008 - 11:41 PM
As for Q, it was equally alarming that 27 years into the series' run, this was the first time Q really had anything significant to do other than hand over gadgets. Sadly, this would be the first and last time such a role was granted to Desmond Llewelyn.
What about in Octopussy? He monitored Bond on Octopussy's island, flew a hot air balloon and potentially shagged at least one of Octopussy's girls!!!
#40
Posted 24 July 2008 - 01:30 AM
Yeah, and it worked so much better in OP than it did in LTK. It just seemed natural to pair Q with Moore's Bond as opposed to Dalton's.As for Q, it was equally alarming that 27 years into the series' run, this was the first time Q really had anything significant to do other than hand over gadgets. Sadly, this would be the first and last time such a role was granted to Desmond Llewelyn.
What about in Octopussy? He monitored Bond on Octopussy's island, flew a hot air balloon and potentially shagged at least one of Octopussy's girls!!!
Personally, I am not a big fan of any of the MI6 office personnel going into the field with Bond.
#41
Posted 24 July 2008 - 01:42 AM
And, yet, they did it in Thunderball...Personally, I am not a big fan of any of the MI6 office personnel going into the field with Bond.
...and YOLT...
...and TSWLM...
...and FYEO...
...and Octopussy...
...and LTK...
...and TND...
...and TWINE...
...and Casino Royale ! Gosh, that's a lot of movies!
#42
Posted 24 July 2008 - 01:50 AM
Well, I probably wasn't as clear as I meant by field I meant literally on the front lines as Q was in OP and LTK. Being at a safe house or on a ship doesn't really count in my view. TWINE is nonwithstanding as M is kidnapped and not voluntarily in the field as Q is in OP and LTK.And, yet, they did it in Thunderball...Personally, I am not a big fan of any of the MI6 office personnel going into the field with Bond.
...and YOLT...
...and TSWLM...
...and FYEO...
...and Octopussy...
...and LTK...
...and TND...
...and TWINE...
...and Casino Royale ! Gosh, that's a lot of movies!
#43
Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:10 PM
I've used music from TDK. Some music from Immediate Music (Slash & Burn I think) And some of the Licence To Kill Score.
Licence To Kill 20th Anniversary Trailer (HD)
#44
Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:28 PM
Since 2009 marks the 20th Anniversary of Licence to Kill, I've decided to throw a trailer together. Using music from The Dark Knight, Immediate Music and Licence To Kill.
I've used music from TDK. Some music from Immediate Music (Slash & Burn I think) And some of the Licence To Kill Score.
Licence To Kill 20th Anniversary Trailer (HD)
Now see if LTK had had trailers like that and this instead of this, it probably would've done a fair bit better at the BO.
#45
Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:40 AM
#46
Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:19 AM
It fascinates me that this film, twenty years after its release, sill splits Bond fans in the middle. No wonder John Glen is proud of it!
Quite. Although I like both Dalton films a lot, I actually prefer LTK to TLD.
#47
Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:25 AM
#48
Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:48 AM
I always took it to mean that he'd rather fire Bond than have him resign (it's like when your boss tells you he's letting you go, but instead you flip him off and tell him he can't do that because you've just quit... it's a matter of principle) and/or that he was simply demoting him back to ordinary agent status (which Bernard Lee's M threatened to do to Bond in Dr. No).Why change his mind in a split second and revoke his licence to kill?
Of course, it is merely a testosterone fuelled exhibition of power. It's what men do so I am told.Yes, though it was not a good idea to give DL too much screen time !As for Q, it was equally alarming that 27 years into the series' run, this was the first time Q really had anything significant to do other than hand over gadgets. Sadly, this would be the first and last time such a role was granted to Desmond Llewelyn.
What about in Octopussy? He monitored Bond on Octopussy's island, flew a hot air balloon and potentially shagged at least one of Octopussy's girls!!!It fascinates me that this film, twenty years after its release, sill splits Bond fans in the middle. No wonder John Glen is proud of it!
Quite. Although I like both Dalton films a lot, I actually prefer LTK to TLD.
Yes me too, but it took some time. I didn't like them much until recently when they have grown on me!
Oddly enough, I went the other way a little. At the time, I really, really rated Dalton's Bond. But as I've grown older, I've found his performance just a tad too theatrical and mannered. It's Daniel Craig that's done it for me, I'm afraid. For me, Craig is a much better screen actor than Dalton (who is a fantastic stage actor, in my view). So while it might be argued that Craig is building on what Dalton tried to do with the role, I think Craig is doing it better.
That said, I still rate the Dalton films highly.
#49
Posted 11 June 2009 - 10:23 AM
Oddly enough, I went the other way a little. At the time, I really, really rated Dalton's Bond. But as I've grown older, I've found his performance just a tad too theatrical and mannered. It's Daniel Craig that's done it for me, I'm afraid. For me, Craig is a much better screen actor than Dalton (who is a fantastic stage actor, in my view).
Off topic, but have you seen Dalton on stage? What play was it?
I'd love to see him perform "live" one day.
#50
Posted 11 June 2009 - 10:40 AM
Oddly enough, I went the other way a little. At the time, I really, really rated Dalton's Bond. But as I've grown older, I've found his performance just a tad too theatrical and mannered. It's Daniel Craig that's done it for me, I'm afraid. For me, Craig is a much better screen actor than Dalton (who is a fantastic stage actor, in my view).
Off topic, but have you seen Dalton on stage? What play was it?
I'd love to see him perform "live" one day.
Yes. There was one play he did with Vanessa Redgrave - A Touch of the Poet - between his Bond films. Very heavy going, but he was excellent.
#51
Posted 11 June 2009 - 01:48 PM
#52
Posted 11 June 2009 - 04:20 PM
It fascinates me that this film, twenty years after its release, sill splits Bond fans in the middle. No wonder John Glen is proud of it!
Quite. Although I like both Dalton films a lot, I actually prefer LTK to TLD.
Ditto. It makes my top 5, actually.
#53
Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:19 PM
It fascinates me that this film, twenty years after its release, sill splits Bond fans in the middle. No wonder John Glen is proud of it!
Quite. Although I like both Dalton films a lot, I actually prefer LTK to TLD.
I prefer LTK to TLD as well, although both films appear in my top 5. LTK was my favorite film until QOS was released, now it sits alongside CR as either my second or third favorite.
#54
Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:38 PM
One superb line 'compliments of Sharkey' which Dalton delivers beautifully cold, is cut and chopped on screen. You hardly see Bond saying that line. Another thing is the way Bond is dressed down. I really doesn't suit him(hair style changing every ten mins). No matter the environment or the realistic situations he is suppose to be in he must look Bond. The Florida scenes are quite bad. There is no smoothness about him.
Love the chemistry between Dalton and Lowell. Wish the Ninja fight was longer.
This Bond film despite a few flaws is still very much Gold. I will never forget the summer of '89. What a movie. Gets better every-time you see it.
One more thing. This film was bashed for not having much marketing and good budget but I admire the fact that will all the difficulties Eon decided to make LTK.
#55
Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:04 PM
Wow, these fan-made trailers have so much more energy than the original theatrical trailer. They really make me want to see "Licence to Kill" . . . while the actual one just gives me a lackluster vibe.Since 2009 marks the 20th Anniversary of Licence to Kill, I've decided to throw a trailer together. Using music from The Dark Knight, Immediate Music and Licence To Kill.
I've used music from TDK. Some music from Immediate Music (Slash & Burn I think) And some of the Licence To Kill Score.
Licence To Kill 20th Anniversary Trailer (HD)
Now see if LTK had had trailers like that and this instead of this, it probably would've done a fair bit better at the BO.
#56
Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:45 PM
I don't know, I differ on a few of these. Davi is quite underrated and excellent in the role, especially when it comes to mention of the top Bond villains.I love LTK. But to be honest I think J Glen was giving Dalton a hard time on screen. Most of the Bond scenes except the tanker chase , Bond is quickly dismissed. Preference is given to Davi Lowell and Soto. All whom are wonderfully crafted and absolute scene stealers.
Lowell is okay, but gets drug down by having to play jealous is one of the script's wrong moves, IMO. And I absolutely can't think of a thing Soto did to distinguish herself. She's more distrating than interesting.
If anybody steals scenes for me it's Wayne Newton and the understated Benicio del Toro. As far as Newton goes, it's the surreal feeling of seeing one of the top acts in Vegas playing a sleazy televangelist and seeing it's more than just a cheap cameo.
As for del Toro, I like how the script establishes him as an evil presence early, he disappears then reappears at a critical moment. I can't think of any other Bond films that made use of a character like that. Dario is as underrated as a henchman as Sanchez is as a main villain.
#57
Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:59 PM
I agree. Davi's Sanchez is what drives Bond and then consequently the whole film.As for del Toro, I like how the script establishes him as an evil presence early, he disappears then reappears at a critical moment. I can't think of any other Bond films that made use of a character like that. Dario is as underrated as a henchman as Sanchez is as a main villain.
For del Toro to be as equally menacing with less screen time and against the host of other supporting villains that appear in LTK, really shows his talents as an actor.
Edited by sthgilyadgnivileht, 11 June 2009 - 10:01 PM.
#58
Posted 11 June 2009 - 10:02 PM
I didn't find him particuarly menacing nor special at all.
#59
Posted 11 June 2009 - 11:56 PM
#60
Posted 12 June 2009 - 02:08 AM