
Pierce Brosnan: James who?
#31
Posted 20 September 2008 - 06:41 AM
#32
Posted 20 September 2008 - 06:50 AM
I agree. He does still look good.Bad, bad article. The reporter appears to have done little research on his subject before the interview. He seems to rely mostly on hearsay and tabloid hyperbole ('Roger Moore turning Bond into a cartoon figure' - which is debateable when you think of YOLT and DAF - 'and Timothy Dalton putting the final nails in the coffin with his politically correct version' WTF?!!!) and the tone of the article from the first line suggests that he has set out to 'get' Brosnan.
Tragic to see how downhill The Daily Telegraph has gone. As someone who had a family member work for them for decades, it's desperately disappointing seeing such a profound fall from grace!
As for his 'Spotlight' entry. When I was acting I can remember Roger Moore's page (I was also an agent so I had access to all volumes) he had just a "?", and that was it.

#33
Posted 20 September 2008 - 04:52 PM
Not an uncommon criticism, actually.'and Timothy Dalton putting the final nails in the coffin with his politically correct version' WTF?!!!
#34
Posted 20 September 2008 - 05:27 PM
#35
Posted 20 September 2008 - 08:52 PM
PIERCE BROSNAN WAS THE BEST 007 IN THE WORLD MUCH BETTER THAN DANIEL CRAIG... UGLY! PIERCE BROSNAN HAVE 53 YEARS BUT HE IS HANDSOME
Did this post fall through the space/time continuum from late 2005?
#36
Posted 21 September 2008 - 01:34 AM
UGLY! PIERCE BROSNAN HAVE 53 YEARS
I agree with you

#37
Posted 21 September 2008 - 02:41 AM
It would be truly interesting to get the 100 percent skinny on what was going on in the year 2004 with Ms Broccoli and Mr Wilson.
And, equally, i'd like the 100 percent skinny on his meeting with CBn's Jim.
#38
Posted 23 September 2008 - 10:41 AM
