Bond's poisoning in CR
#1
Posted 22 April 2008 - 11:11 AM
#2
Posted 22 April 2008 - 11:35 AM
My concern about this scene has always been in the science of it. The analysis supposedly done on the poison by MI6 would have had to have been chemical, meaning that Bond's car would have had to have included interactive amounts of numerous, controlled liquids to be introduced to the sample in order to ascertain its identity. This would have made the DBS even more far-fetched than the Vanquish.
Now that is a Q-car!
#3
Posted 22 April 2008 - 12:26 PM
I was watching CR for the third time today and when I got to the part where Bond was slipped digitalis, I watched the man giving him medical advice and wondered is he supposed to be MI-6 doctor Sir James Maloney? I didn't think of it before but watching it now it all made sense.
I don't think so, because Sir James Moloney is supposed to be a shrink
But I share Dell Deaton's doubts about the credibility of the car's role in this scene. Too far fetched, they should have come up with a more simple way of handling this.
#4
Posted 22 April 2008 - 01:33 PM
My guess is that this snag came from "Q envy." They didn't want to have a Q, but couldn't do w/out that aspect of the James Bond mythos.... they should have come up with a more simple way of handling this.
#5
Posted 22 April 2008 - 01:41 PM
Good question.
My concern about this scene has always been in the science of it. The analysis supposedly done on the poison by MI6 would have had to have been chemical, meaning that Bond's car would have had to have included interactive amounts of numerous, controlled liquids to be introduced to the sample in order to ascertain its identity. This would have made the DBS even more far-fetched than the Vanquish.
Now that is a Q-car!
[mra]My impression was that the car only had a drawer where the medical gizmo was housed and that the gizmo interfaced with the bug in Bond
#6
Posted 22 April 2008 - 01:53 PM
My concern about this scene has always been in the science of it. The analysis supposedly done on the poison by MI6 would have had to have been chemical, meaning that Bond's car would have had to have included interactive amounts of numerous, controlled liquids to be introduced to the sample in order to ascertain its identity. This would have made the DBS even more far-fetched than the Vanquish.
Now that is a Q-car![/quote]
[mra]My impression was that the car only had a drawer where the medical gizmo was housed and that the gizmo interfaced with the bug in Bond
#7
Posted 22 April 2008 - 02:08 PM
I don't think so, because Sir James Moloney is supposed to be a shrink
In fact, Fleming portrays Sir James Moloney as one of Britain's foremost neurologists. That makes him a physician. It would be a mistake to classify him as a "shrink," even if M did turn to him very often in an effort to diagnose what was going on inside of 007's head.
Edited by MicroGlobeOne, 22 April 2008 - 02:10 PM.
#8
Posted 06 May 2008 - 02:54 PM
I was watching CR for the third time today and when I got to the part where Bond was slipped digitalis, I watched the man giving him medical advice and wondered is he supposed to be MI-6 doctor Sir James Molony? I didn't think of it before but watching it now it all made sense.
I don't think so, because Sir James Moloney is supposed to be a shrink
But I share Dell Deaton's doubts about the credibility of the car's role in this scene. Too far fetched, they should have come up with a more simple way of handling this.
In Doctor No; M states that Sir James 'would be doing his rounds at St Mary's about now' Then Sir James goes on to tell M that Bond is 'physically fit as fiddle' and later he goes on to explain the effects of tetrodotoxin that Rosa Klebb had on the spike in her shoe. Not really a psychiatrists area of expertise. My feeling was that Sir James was the 'company doctor' if he needed to send an agent to specıalıst he would, but he oversaw the case.
#9
Posted 04 June 2008 - 08:26 PM