Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

New Michael G. Wilson Interview


26 replies to this topic

#1 Shrublands

Shrublands

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4012 posts
  • Location:Conveniently Near the NATO Base

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:13 PM



Michael G. Wilson discusses Ian Fleming's 'Quantum of Solace', the Writers Guild strike and the 007 mythology


http://uk.movies.ign...7/847944p1.html

I’m very reassured by the…

IGN:And the gadgets?

Wilson: Well we haven't been too strong on gadgets, we've just used realistic things within the world.


After the “more gadgets this time” remark at the press conference, I think that and the “twice the action" was just a producer hyping his product for the media.

Edited by [dark], 29 January 2008 - 12:50 AM.


#2 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:15 PM

Spoiler


#3 00Twelve

00Twelve

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7706 posts
  • Location:Kingsport, TN

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:18 PM

Seems the apple doesn't fall too far from the tree. Way to keep up family tradition, Mike! :tup:

#4 The Dove

The Dove

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16671 posts
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:20 PM

Great find Shrublands!! I love it how the writer of the interview says that Michael Wilson first got involved in the Bond series on The Spy Who Loved Me....in 1972!!!! WTF??? :tup: Come on people!! Check your facts and get them right!!! :tup:

#5 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:22 PM

"Wilson: Well we haven't been too strong on gadgets, we've just used realistic things within the world."

Brilliant! :tup:

#6 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:24 PM

Moved to spoilers, although arguably such spoilers as there are confirm what's not in it as much as what's in it.

#7 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:29 PM

Nice to know they're not big on the gadgets.

What's really great is how focused Forster is:
[box]"We wanted a director who would work with the actors and attract great actors. Marc is also incredibly well prepared. He's the most prepared director I've ever worked with. Every scene in the picture has been planned

#8 00Twelve

00Twelve

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7706 posts
  • Location:Kingsport, TN

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:34 PM

I was about to bring up that same point, Harms. It's very exciting to see that the director has so meticulously planned the shoot. I'm expecting a wonderfully new and different style on this one. And with such a "calm" shooting environment, everyone involved will have the best chance they can to deliver the material to the best of its potential. Great find, shrub.

#9 killkenny kid

killkenny kid

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6607 posts
  • Location:Albany, New York

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:35 PM

[quote name='Shrublands' post='829574' date='28 January 2008 - 12:13']After the

#10 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:37 PM

[quote name='killkenny kid' post='829594' date='28 January 2008 - 11:35'][quote name='Shrublands' post='829574' date='28 January 2008 - 12:13']After the

#11 Shrublands

Shrublands

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4012 posts
  • Location:Conveniently Near the NATO Base

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:45 PM

[quote name='killkenny kid' post='829594' date='28 January 2008 - 17:35'][quote name='Shrublands' post='829574' date='28 January 2008 - 12:13']After the

#12 killkenny kid

killkenny kid

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6607 posts
  • Location:Albany, New York

Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:46 PM

Yes, it is. :tup:

#13 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 28 January 2008 - 06:03 PM

Twice the action was a quote directed to Joe Schmuck from middle west america the guy who think Rambo as too much talk and Die Hard 1 not enough action and that Terminator drags a bit in the parts where the girl talks, but Chuck Norris TV series are best.

#14 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 28 January 2008 - 06:12 PM

Just watched THE KITE RUNNER and thought about what a daunting prospect that must have been to direct. Forster seems like a fantastic director, and the Bond franchise is lucky to have him.

#15 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:50 AM



Michael G. Wilson discusses Ian Fleming's 'Quantum of Solace', the Writers Guild strike and the 007 mythology


#16 MR. BOND 93

MR. BOND 93

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 821 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:56 AM

Nice interview, sounds like everyone just loves Marc :tup:

#17 delfloria

delfloria

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 675 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:47 AM

IGN.......Where are the interviews with CommanderBond.net?????????

#18 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:54 AM

Yep, the gadget comment is fine by me. It suits the Craig era. Gadgets that are available today being used by Bond and in the DBS is fine with me.

#19 Jackanaples

Jackanaples

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 992 posts
  • Location:Hollywood, CA

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:04 AM

Wilson: Well we haven't been too strong on gadgets, we've just used realistic things within the world.


Just what I thought when it was announced that there would be more gadgets in the press conference. Glad to have it spelled out. Wilson's comment here as well as Forster's about "more not always meaning bigger" have me very keen on QOS.

If anything characterizes the Craig era, I think it's the hard shift away from the fantastic toward the realistic yet very exotic. That's what James Bond should be in my opinion.

Edited by Jackanaples, 29 January 2008 - 02:05 AM.


#20 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:52 AM

Nice interview, sounds like everyone just loves Marc :tup:


That seems to almost be an understatement. :tup:

Excellent interview.

#21 Bondian

Bondian

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8019 posts
  • Location:Soufend-On-Sea, Mate. England. UK.

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:59 AM

If he's that good, then keep him on for at least two. :tup:

#22 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:06 AM

"...realistic yet very exotic. That's what James Bond should be in my opinion."

Precisely. Craig to me has the very best qualities of James Bond. He has Connery's swagger and confidence, and Dalton's stone cold cruelty and seriousness on missions. He has Connery's execution of puns, but they are Daltonesque in the context in which they are said.

A bit off topic there, but the realistic and exotic comment struck a chord. The Craig era is shaping up nicely.

#23 MarcAngeDraco

MarcAngeDraco

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3312 posts
  • Location:Oxford, Michigan

Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:08 AM

Great find Shrublands!! I love it how the writer of the interview says that Michael Wilson first got involved in the Bond series on The Spy Who Loved Me....in 1972!!!! WTF??? :( Come on people!! Check your facts and get them right!!! :tup:


It looks like he combined two facts to make one incorrect statement. More sloppy journalism... :tup:

#24 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:42 AM

It looks like he combined two facts to make one incorrect statement. More sloppy journalism... :tup:


I am afraid so. My communications degree will be over in two years, so you will all have to wait until then for journalistic credibility to return. :tup:

#25 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:34 PM

It looks like he combined two facts to make one incorrect statement. More sloppy journalism... :tup:


I am afraid so. My communications degree will be over in two years, so you will all have to wait until then for journalistic credibility to return. :tup:


I just hope you avoid the tabloids! :(

#26 doubler83

doubler83

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 747 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:22 PM

From reading about how prepared the director is, and how calm the set is, we might have a short shooting period. Or, shorter than normal.

Very encouraging interview nonetheless.

#27 Binyamin

Binyamin

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1075 posts
  • Location:On Assignment in the Caribbean

Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:00 PM

Well, nothing wrong with a shorter shoot. More time to perfect the trailers! :tup: