
If Daniel Craig was in OHMSS
#1
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:13 PM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
Anyway, if you imagine that Craig would have made OHMSS an absolutely amazing film, then a more realistic question. Would you like to see OHMSS re-made with Craig? The pros would be a potentially great script with a marvellous actor (who can act) in what should be the most challenging acting job. The biggest pro would be that they could then film YOLT based on the book, something which has screamed (if concepts can scream) to be filmed. I think the general public would see it because most folks, if they've seen OHMSS at all, haven't seen it a zillion times (like say GF). The cons are you lose the things that really worked in OHMSS the first time: Barry's soundtrack, Diana Rigg's performance, the performances as Draco, Irma Bunt, and Savalas (although I'd like a more literary based Blofeld-with hair and no cat, please), the ski scenes (although no reason you couldn't film them again), and those moments where Laz does nail it. Personally I'd vote yes, but you'd have to wait a few movies so that the character was properly established (you can't go straight from CR to OHMSS).
So, you have your choice of questions to answer:
1. What if Craig could be put into the original OHMSS; and
2. Should they re-make OHMSS with Craig.
Your thoughts please.
#2
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:25 PM
So, you have your choice of questions to answer:
1. What if Craig could be put into the original OHMSS; and
2. Should they re-make OHMSS with Craig.
Your thoughts please.
1) It would make the movie stronger, perhaps even the best of the series. It is hard to pass judgment without physically seeing it. That said, I do feel that Laz was one of the weak points of the movie, so changing him with Craig on paper looks like an improvement.
2) No, I am against remakes of Bond.
#3
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:29 PM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
#4
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:41 PM
But the power of the ending is amplified by Laz's newness/naivety, or in retrospect, the fact that he was a one-off Bond has heightened over time the power of that moment. Bond suffers, and the Bond that we see there in the car up on screen, both physically as Laz, and literally (emotionally vulnerable/wounded) won't be back.
I'm not saying DC coudn't do it and I'm not saying he couldn't do it better, bet there is a uniqueness of Laz and that moment.
Should OHMSS be re-made? I don't know. In general I'm against remaking movies that are regarded as great. The number of occasions where Hollywood has improved an original are far, far, outnumbered by the occasions where the remake is regarded as being of lesser quality. And as Hazard pointed out, too many things that make OHMSS as good as it is would be lost (score, camera shots etc).
As for YOLT - I have no doubt some good writers could find a way to incorporate some of the great stuff from the novel into an original script. A shame? Sure, but butchering the source material has been an EON modus operandi from the start.
#5
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:46 PM
2) No, I am against remakes of Bond.
What about new adaptations... er like CR ?

#6
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:57 PM
#7
Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:59 PM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
Well, it's an opinion I share. I thought Laz did a passable job throughout the movie. The only part where I have a beef with his acting chops is at the end, when Tracy is killed. I just didn't quite buy his emotional performance at that last bit. Craig, on the other hand, I think could knock that scene out of the
![[censored]](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/43706-if-daniel-craig-was-in-ohmss/style_emoticons/default/censored.gif)
Should they remake OHMSS with Craig? No, I don't think so. I'm not entirely against remaking Bond films. Like CR... yes, technically it's a remake, but come on, the previous screen incarnations left something to be desired. But OHMSS is near perfect in my opinion, even with Laz, and I just see no point in doing it. Plus, I think to have Craig's Bond find the love of his life, again, and then lose her, again, I think would be a little too repetative.
Edited by HH007, 14 November 2007 - 05:00 PM.
#8
Posted 14 November 2007 - 05:42 PM
However, I would not bother making a remake of the 1969 version of OHMSS. I don't find it necessary to remake what I believe is one of the best Bond movies ever. And I also believe that OHMSS would not have been that good without the contribution of Lazenby's performance. I feel that one of the movie's greatest strengths is that Lazenby had portrayed Bond as a human being, instead of an iconic superspy.
#9
Posted 14 November 2007 - 05:56 PM
Not to say I think they should do it- not sure Craig's Bond can fall in love with every woman who's about to die that he meets, and the original doesn't need replacing- but it would work so well with Craig.
#10
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:00 PM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
Well, it's an opinion I share. I thought Laz did a passable job throughout the movie. The only part where I have a beef with his acting chops is at the end, when Tracy is killed. I just didn't quite buy his emotional performance at that last bit. Craig, on the other hand, I think could knock that scene out of theing ballpark.
Should they remake OHMSS with Craig? No, I don't think so. I'm not entirely against remaking Bond films. Like CR... yes, technically it's a remake, but come on, the previous screen incarnations left something to be desired. But OHMSS is near perfect in my opinion, even with Laz, and I just see no point in doing it. Plus, I think to have Craig's Bond find the love of his life, again, and then lose her, again, I think would be a little too repetative.
Eh,i rather take Lazenby over Craig.I think Craigs acting skills are a tad overrated.
#11
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:21 PM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
Well, it's an opinion I share. I thought Laz did a passable job throughout the movie. The only part where I have a beef with his acting chops is at the end, when Tracy is killed. I just didn't quite buy his emotional performance at that last bit. Craig, on the other hand, I think could knock that scene out of theing ballpark.
Should they remake OHMSS with Craig? No, I don't think so. I'm not entirely against remaking Bond films. Like CR... yes, technically it's a remake, but come on, the previous screen incarnations left something to be desired. But OHMSS is near perfect in my opinion, even with Laz, and I just see no point in doing it. Plus, I think to have Craig's Bond find the love of his life, again, and then lose her, again, I think would be a little too repetative.
Eh,i rather take Lazenby over Craig.I think Craigs acting skills are a tad overrated.
Well, to each his own my friend... but sorry, I honestly cannot understand that point of view. I think Craig's by far the most versatile Bond actor we've ever had. Not only did he give a multi-dimensional performance as Bond, he's also played a variety of different roles over the years. Just check out some of his other movies. I think he's going to win an Oscar some day.
#12
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:34 PM

As to Craig in OHMSS, I can't think of a way he'd fall short of anything Laz did. I actually think Laz is underrated, but Craig is one of the better, more dedicated actors I've seen in a long time. I think he'd be the one element that would set OHMSS as the head-and-shoulders-over-the-rest best Bond film of all. Again, just me.

#13
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:36 PM
A version of this made now with Craig would be just superb. Lazenby is the weak point, but then Diana Rigg is the strong point- Eva Green was good but if only we could have had a Vesper as strong as Diana made her Tracy. You can really understand why Bond would fall for Tracy- not so much for Vesper. She's nice, but she doesn't sparkle like Rigg does in OHMSS.
Actually, I think Eva Green sparkles quite nicely. She's a little cold at first, but I feel she made Vesper the most endearing Bond girl since Diana Rigg's Tracy. Thats my opinion, though.
#14
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:39 PM

#15
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:48 PM
A version of this made now with Craig would be just superb. Lazenby is the weak point, but then Diana Rigg is the strong point- Eva Green was good but if only we could have had a Vesper as strong as Diana made her Tracy. You can really understand why Bond would fall for Tracy- not so much for Vesper. She's nice, but she doesn't sparkle like Rigg does in OHMSS.
Actually, I think Eva Green sparkles quite nicely. She's a little cold at first, but I feel she made Vesper the most endearing Bond girl since Diana Rigg's Tracy. Thats my opinion, though.
She's okay, but every time I see that train scene I find myself imagining Rigg actually imbueing the lines with character and life; actual playful banter with a sharp edge instead of that gutteral moan and blank stare that Eva uses.
#16
Posted 14 November 2007 - 07:27 PM
Maybe the last of the DC bond films would be the proper version of YOLT with OHMSS preceding it.
#17
Posted 14 November 2007 - 07:30 PM
#18
Posted 14 November 2007 - 08:00 PM
I don't want Bond falling in love again until at least 2012.
#19
Posted 15 November 2007 - 01:43 AM
I've always felt that this was the weakest point of the whole series, the way that Tracy's death was dealt with. Until FYEO it was if it never happened.
#20
Posted 15 November 2007 - 04:01 AM
I still consider Dalton the greatest actor to take on the role of bond.
#21
Posted 15 November 2007 - 04:21 AM
#22
Posted 15 November 2007 - 04:21 AM
Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
If you prefer Craig as Bond over Laz as Bond is an opinion. It is FACT that Craig is a far superior and versital ACTOR than Lazenby.
I also think Dalton is a very good actor, but he does not have quite the range that Craig does (I have seen most of the movies that Dalton has made).
#23
Posted 15 November 2007 - 04:26 AM
I just don't see it as a fact.Sure people could say look at there acting work.It's just not something that can be proven to be 100% percent fact like for example(A cow produces milk)it might be the general census but it's not something that can be proved concrete.Please, Laz fans, this is fantasy. I like Laz, own the DVD of OHMSS, etc., but he's not the actor Craig is.
That's an opinion.
If you prefer Craig as Bond over Laz as Bond is an opinion. It is FACT that Craig is a far superior and versital ACTOR than Lazenby.
#24
Posted 15 November 2007 - 05:38 AM
She's okay, but every time I see that train scene I find myself imagining Rigg actually imbueing the lines with character and life; actual playful banter with a sharp edge instead of that gutteral moan and blank stare that Eva uses.
I don't even think of Diana Rigg when I see that train scene in CASINO ROYALE. As far as I'm concerned, Eva Green owns the role. And she had the good luck to portray a slightly more complex and interesting character than Rigg's Tracy.
And as I have stated before, I don't believe that Lazenby was a weak point in OHMSS. In fact, I think that he was one of the reasons why the movie was so damn good. Without his performance, I don't think that OHMSS would be as highly regarded as it is today. And as good as she is, I doubt that Diana Rigg could have carried the movie, considering that she was only in half of it.
#25
Posted 15 November 2007 - 07:52 AM
Maybe it's just me then?
I still consider Dalton the greatest actor to take on the role of bond.
I agree that he was the best Bond in the old format, gadgets cars etc. He did make those things a bit more realistic. I think that DC has taken it to another level with CR, my only hope is that they (EON) don't go back to Mooore/Brosnan style of Bond. I've always felt that with FRWL, OHMSS, TLD, LTK & CR the things that go on around the film don't get in the way of the story.
I've often felt that the story has to go in a certain direction so Bond has to use his new toy.
#26
Posted 15 November 2007 - 03:20 PM
I have a lot of confidence in Daniel.
He is a good James Bond.
And if you took Connery for the part it just didn`t work.
That is my inpression.
OHMSS is a stand alone Bondfilm.
The same as Casino Royale or License To Kill for instance.
#27
Posted 16 November 2007 - 03:34 AM
So, you have your choice of questions to answer:
1. What if Craig could be put into the original OHMSS; and
2. Should they re-make OHMSS with Craig.
Your thoughts please.
1) It would make the movie stronger, perhaps even the best of the series. It is hard to pass judgment without physically seeing it. That said, I do feel that Laz was one of the weak points of the movie, so changing him with Craig on paper looks like an improvement.
2) No, I am against remakes of Bond.
To be honest, I disagree with the statement that Lazenby was the weak point of that movie. I thought he did a great job.
#28
Posted 16 November 2007 - 04:16 PM
So, you have your choice of questions to answer:
1. What if Craig could be put into the original OHMSS; and
2. Should they re-make OHMSS with Craig.
Your thoughts please.
1) It would make the movie stronger, perhaps even the best of the series. It is hard to pass judgment without physically seeing it. That said, I do feel that Laz was one of the weak points of the movie, so changing him with Craig on paper looks like an improvement.
2) No, I am against remakes of Bond.
To be honest, I disagree with the statement that Lazenby was the weak point of that movie. I thought he did a great job.
Until he opened his mouth. A new thread perhaps: OHMSS could have been the best silent film ever.
#29
Posted 19 February 2008 - 05:50 AM
#30
Posted 19 February 2008 - 05:53 AM
