Whats your opinion on Dario?
#31
Posted 30 January 2008 - 07:02 AM
#32
Posted 30 January 2008 - 07:56 AM
#33
Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:53 PM
#34
Posted 22 February 2008 - 07:23 PM
#35
Posted 22 February 2008 - 09:33 PM
Fantastic henchman, but it was a real waste to not give him an extended fight with Bond. Replace the Bimini bar with something less, well, 80s and let Bond duke it out with Dario while Pam takes care of the other cronies, and the scene is vastly improved.
Agreed. An extended fight sequence between Bond and Dario would have been fantastic, and would have been better than the fight scene in the bar, which is, IMO, the only weak part of the entire film.
#36
Posted 22 February 2008 - 09:54 PM
#37
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:25 PM
Good description, Major. Dario seemed to really enjoy his position and the perks of sadistically killing the enemies of his employer.A very effective villain. The kind of guy who, if ordered, literally would cut your heart out. Sadistic, dangerous, and more than a little creepy.
Not to mention, he really knew how to provide a "nice honeymooooooon"!
#38
Posted 22 March 2008 - 05:22 AM
Agreed, the real question is- where'd he go after maiming Felix?Probably one of the better henchmen, a perfect teammate for Davi but his character is too much in the shadow.
One could say he was only there for the big jobs- but then where was he for the Krest job, a pretty big one for Sanchez? Especially given Bond isn't known to be there (the obvious reason for keeping him off-screen). Same goes for the later Casino scenes without him. I wonder if it was ala DAF-Lois Maxwell?
I thought he was great, but confusingly underused. I also really liked Perez and Braun, the henchmen. Given their lack of speaking, they are pretty menacing (see: Krest sequence) and effective. They're not Dario or Sanchez, but also not meant to be. I don't see anyone criticising nameless second-tier henchmen in the Connery years (except maybe Mike Myers). It's just more one-eyed Bond fan opinions to me.
Something about his death was a bit contrived as well, but now I'm just complaining.
For me, the reason LTK had such strength at the end in the action sequences was because Bond had Dario, then Perez/Braun/etc, then Sanchez to take on. A whole operation, not nameless idiots like most 70-80's Bond films (second-tier villains, not the lead ones).
- Spike
#39
Posted 22 March 2008 - 05:29 AM
I wonder if it was ala DAF-Lois Maxwell?Probably one of the better henchmen, a perfect teammate for Davi but his character is too much in the shadow.
#40
Posted 22 March 2008 - 06:51 PM
Maxwell in DAF wanted more money or something, and wanted to do other films, hence why she's hardly in DAF at all.
I don't know anything about Del Toro and his career, I'm just trying to explain why you'd have a character like Dario and excise him from the whole middle bit of the movie, when he's supposed to be a right-hand-man, or at least, right hand man in training.
- Spike
#41
Posted 23 March 2008 - 02:59 AM
I think you're missing that more is less with Dario. He turns up just when Bond is about to blow things open on Sanchez's operation, the worst possible scenario for Bond -- he is the only one of Sanchez's crew who can recognize him. It adds suspense, and when in any other Bond film has that happened?I don't know anything about Del Toro and his career, I'm just trying to explain why you'd have a character like Dario and excise him from the whole middle bit of the movie, when he's supposed to be a right-hand-man, or at least, right hand man in training.
- Spike
As for Del Toro and his career, he has only worked steadily since LTK and earned an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for Traffic in 2000 and is still in a variety of films, usually of a more independent nature, although he does show up in commercial projects from time to time.
#42
Posted 26 March 2008 - 12:31 AM
#43
Posted 26 March 2008 - 07:47 PM
#44
Posted 26 March 2008 - 08:35 PM
Dario comes across as a truly ed up psycho-sexual nut case with surpressed homo-erotic tendencies. Perfect for the James Bond series and a twist or variation on a theme of the Red Grant proto-type hench. Better than the likes of Stamper or Necros who got more screen time.
The reason we now go back to LTK more than otherwise is because of some really great stunt work and for a nostalgic look at an actor who nearly won an Oscar a decade following his James Bond experience.
#45
Posted 27 March 2008 - 12:28 AM
Nearly won an Oscar? He did win a "best actor in a supporting role" Oscar in 2001 for "Traffic" (not to mention a whole slew of other awards). Well-deserved too, IMO.The reason we now go back to LTK more than otherwise is because of some really great stunt work and for a nostalgic look at an actor who nearly won an Oscar a decade following his James Bond experience.
#46
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:58 AM
Nearly won an Oscar? He did win a "best actor in a supporting role" Oscar in 2001 for "Traffic" (not to mention a whole slew of other awards). Well-deserved too, IMO.The reason we now go back to LTK more than otherwise is because of some really great stunt work and for a nostalgic look at an actor who nearly won an Oscar a decade following his James Bond experience.
Agreed. A very well deserved Oscar win by Benicio Del Toro (and it was a shame that TRAFFIC didn't win more awards that year as it was a great film filled with many outstanding performances).
#47
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:15 AM
What do I think of Dario?
Dario comes across as a truly ed up psycho-sexual nut case with surpressed homo-erotic tendencies.
Are we talking about Dario or Paco "Pistols" Scaramanga.
#48
Posted 27 March 2008 - 06:57 PM
#49
Posted 27 March 2008 - 08:57 PM
Dario, on the other hand, isn't a May Day; he's not a giant Gobinda; he's an unknown and that is what, to me, made him so effective.