
I Am America (And So Can You!)
#1
Posted 21 October 2007 - 09:41 PM
#2
Posted 26 October 2007 - 05:25 AM
#3
Posted 26 October 2007 - 02:24 PM

#4
Posted 29 October 2007 - 12:24 AM

#5
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:02 PM
#6
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:40 PM

#7
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:44 PM
I heard a rumor that he's in the lead in the South Carolina polls.. I hope it's true
For which party? Both? LOL
#8
Posted 29 October 2007 - 10:26 PM
If everybody in South Carolina voted for him, he would still lose the election because he would have 0 votes in the other 49 states.I heard a rumor that he's in the lead in the South Carolina polls.. I hope it's true
He's a Democrat in "real life" which means he would never get my vote.
#9
Posted 29 October 2007 - 11:12 PM
Happens every time I pick up a book I wish to read.
#10
Posted 29 October 2007 - 11:39 PM
He's a Democrat in "real life" which means he would never get my vote.
So you're saying you don't vote for the person, you vote for the political party?
#11
Posted 02 July 2011 - 02:56 AM
Haven't read the book but I love Red Eye! It was one of my favorite shows while I was at uni.
This is ranked #5 in book sales on Amazon.com and none of you are reading/read it?
Also recently read Greg Gutfeld's "Bible of Unspeakable Truths". You ever read it or watch his show?
#12
Posted 02 July 2011 - 03:09 AM
Red Eye? You mean, the Red Eye that defamed Canadian troops in 2009?Haven't read the book but I love Red Eye! It was one of my favorite shows while I was at uni.Also recently read Greg Gutfeld's "Bible of Unspeakable Truths". You ever read it or watch his show?
You two deserve each other... just wish it didn't have to be in a thread about a genuine liberal genius, but that's what happens when the joke flies so far over your heads that you think Colbert means what he says.
Just... reprehensible, you two.
#13
Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:10 AM
Red Eye? You mean, the Red Eye that defamed Canadian troops in 2009?Haven't read the book but I love Red Eye! It was one of my favorite shows while I was at uni.Also recently read Greg Gutfeld's "Bible of Unspeakable Truths". You ever read it or watch his show?
You two deserve each other... just wish it didn't have to be in a thread about a genuine liberal genius, but that's what happens when the joke flies so far over your heads that you think Colbert means what he says.
Just... reprehensible, you two.

Over our heads? The Colbert Report is an act, an elaborate parody of Bill O'Reilly, etc. What's so hard to understand?
And your boy Jon Stewart called President Harry S. Truman a war criminal. Now that's reprehensible, you poof.
Jon Stewart Apologizes For Calling Truman a War Criminal
Edited by Righty007, 02 July 2011 - 07:20 AM.
#14
Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:17 AM
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnndddddddd....this is why no one likes you.You two deserve each other... just wish it didn't have to be in a thread about a genuine liberal genius, but that's what happens when the joke flies so far over your heads that you think Colbert means what he says.
Just... reprehensible, you two.
#15
Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:23 AM
Mr. Blofeld's motto: "When life gives you lemons, take your anger out on people you don't even know via a James Bond discussion forum."Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnndddddddd....this is why no one likes you.
You two deserve each other... just wish it didn't have to be in a thread about a genuine liberal genius, but that's what happens when the joke flies so far over your heads that you think Colbert means what he says.
Just... reprehensible, you two.
#16
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:12 PM

#17
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:20 PM
#18
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:25 PM
Gang-up? Not so much. It's just a few like-minded people who recognize your constantly condescending, pretentiously prickish behavior on these forums and are not afraid to call you out on it.And so, the gang-up begins; everyone pats themselves on the back, gives each other rep, and questions my masculinity -- which, of course, could only be done by men not very secure in theirs...
And you clearly have your fair share of insecurities considering how preoccupied you are with yours and others' online reputations.

#19
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:30 PM
How precious. Mrs. Blofeld has no problem attacking people without cause but when they respond, he claims he's being ganged up on. Pathetic.And so, the gang-up begins; everyone pats themselves on the back, gives each other rep, and questions my masculinity -- which, of course, could only be done by men not very secure in theirs...
#20
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:35 PM
#21
Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:59 PM
Gang-up? Not so much. It's just a few like-minded people who recognize your constant condescending, pretentiously prickish behavior on these forums and are not afraid to call you out on it.
And so, the gang-up begins; everyone pats themselves on the back, gives each other rep, and questions my masculinity -- which, of course, could only be done by men not very secure in theirs...
And you clearly have your fair share of insecurities considering how preoccupied you are with yours and others' online reputations.
I thought you two were BFFs. Am I a bit out of date?
#22
Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:14 PM
Quite.I thought you two were BFFs. Am I a bit out of date?
#23
Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:39 PM
#24
Posted 03 July 2011 - 08:45 AM
You may not like me
You're not significant enough for me to dislike you.
Instead of all of us pretending that everyone is a little bit to blame here, let's lay the blame for this at the feet of the person who truly deserves it: MR.BLOFELD.
Fine, we'll do that - that anonymous internet person is to blame. Super. Another enraged victory, achieving much.
#25
Posted 03 July 2011 - 08:57 AM
With all due respect, Jim, I doubt Gravity's Silhouette would have felt compelled to say what he did had the mods here been doing their jobs by addressing Mr. Blofeld's behavior on these forums over the last several years. I've seen other members here reprimanded for a LOT less than what he's been consistently guilty of doing over and over again.Fine, we'll do that - that anonymous internet person is to blame. Super. Another enraged victory, achieving much.
#26
Posted 03 July 2011 - 09:02 AM
With all due respect, Jim, I doubt Gravity's Silhouette would have felt compelled to say what he did had the mods here been doing their jobs by addressing Mr. Blofeld's behavior on these forums over the last several years. I've seen other members here reprimanded for a LOT less than what he's been consistently guilty of doing over and over again.
Fine, we'll do that - that anonymous internet person is to blame. Super. Another enraged victory, achieving much.
OK, noted, sorry if I missed something - but I must have missed something.
#27
Posted 03 July 2011 - 09:06 AM
I'm not singling you out, which is why I used the plural 'mods'--granted, I have no idea who the hell the mods even are nowadays.OK, noted, sorry if I missed something - but I must have missed something.
And if your response was an implication that you believe Mr. Blofeld hasn't done anything wrong, then color me astounded.
#28
Posted 03 July 2011 - 09:11 AM
I'm not singling you out, which is why I used the plural 'mods'--granted, I have no idea who the hell the mods even are nowadays.
OK, noted, sorry if I missed something - but I must have missed something.
And if your response was an implication that you believe Mr. Blofeld hasn't done anything wrong, then color me astounded.
No desire to colour you anything, my lovely.
I'm probably not paying that much attention to the boards these days and if things are slipping, apologies. If there is something serious, do use the Report this Post thing as then all moderators can see it and people are not relying on my whimsical sense of detached and ill-deserved superiority / fecklessness to take action. No reports at all does rather rely on those moderators around having to read everything and try to spot stuff.
#29
Posted 03 July 2011 - 09:13 AM
I appreciate the explanation.I'm probably not paying that much attention to the boards these days and if things are slipping, apologies. If there is something serious, do use the Report this Post thing as then all moderators can see it and people are not relying on my whimsical sense of detached and ill-deserved superiority / fecklessness to take action. No reports at all does rather rely on those moderators around having to read everything and try to spot stuff.

#30
Posted 03 July 2011 - 09:19 AM