If Dalton did Casino Royale
#1
Posted 20 August 2007 - 09:12 PM
Would it have been pretty similar to the film we got with Daniel Craig? Or radically different?
And what if it was the exact same script and plot, and Dalton starred opposite Eva Green?
What do you think?
I personally always felt that Casino Royale seemed like a Dalton vehicle. So maybe it wouldn't have been all that different, and since Dalton would have come after Brosnan instead of the very lighthearted Moore, maybe he might have been more readily accepted in the role.
#2
Posted 20 August 2007 - 09:28 PM
If Dalton starred in Casino Royale (if he was now the age he was when he made TLD), what do you think the movie would have been like?
Would it have been pretty similar to the film we got with Daniel Craig? Or radically different?
And what if it was the exact same script and plot, and Dalton starred opposite Eva Green?
What do you think?
I personally always felt that Casino Royale seemed like a Dalton vehicle. So maybe it wouldn't have been all that different, and since Dalton would have come after Brosnan instead of the very lighthearted Moore, maybe he might have been more readily accepted in the role.
IMO it would have been closer to Craig's performance than say Brosnan, Moore or Lazenby, but it would have had it's own seriousness to it that would have made it different from Craig. Craig seemed to bring a slightly mischievious quality to his Bond that would have been missing if Dalton had done it IMHO. What do you think?
#3
Posted 21 August 2007 - 03:13 AM
#4
Posted 21 August 2007 - 05:13 AM
#5
Posted 21 August 2007 - 07:21 AM
I truly think Dalton is the most flemingian bond of the lot. Mainly because of how he carries himself and the similar looks that Fleming described in his books.
#6
Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:42 PM
IMO it would have been closer to Craig's performance than say Brosnan, Moore or Lazenby, but it would have had it's own seriousness to it that would have made it different from Craig. Craig seemed to bring a slightly mischievious quality to his Bond that would have been missing if Dalton had done it IMHO. What do you think?
I completely agree. If Dalton had done this, it would probably be slightly more serious and more intense in some scenes (imagine the poker scenes). However some of the mischievious scenes would be toned down or altered, I can't see Dalton saying 'Oww' in the scene where Bond is tagged. Perhaps it would have been even closer to the novel.
Again, if Dalton done this, it would be tailored to his Bond, as a mature, experienced and relatively responsible professional who thinks of the potential consequences to his actions. Daniel Craig done a brilliant job as a brash professional who is still learning.
Edited by G.I Jord, 15 October 2007 - 10:45 PM.
#7
Posted 16 October 2007 - 03:37 PM
#8
Posted 16 October 2007 - 04:07 PM
#9
Posted 16 October 2007 - 04:20 PM
#10
Posted 16 October 2007 - 07:02 PM
But I'm not sure if Dalton's TLD Bond would have been a good fit for CR. The mischievenous of DC's performance is central to the arc of Bond learning his lesson about "trust" and his seasoning etc. Dalton's brooding Bond would not have been caught out by Vesper. Dalton's TLD Bond just somehow seems a bit more wordly, more aware of what it is that he does.
The CR movie-Bond has a younger, more youthful (and I mean that in reference to his experience) man at it's core.
#11
Posted 16 October 2007 - 07:08 PM
It might work, you know...
#12
Posted 16 October 2007 - 07:35 PM
Perhaps if you view Casino Royale as coming before The Living Daylights?
It might work, you know...
I don't disagree, Mr B - my only point is that Dalton would have to play the character written for DC, rather than just transplanting the TLD Bond into CR.
As much as DC and TD seem to be coming from the same general place as 007 (taking things seriously, less quipping about, liberal use of Fleming's original creation) there are differences in their portrayal.
But as I said, there's no reason Dalton the actor couldn't pull it off.
#13
Posted 16 October 2007 - 09:34 PM
But I love DC too.
#14
Posted 31 October 2007 - 07:30 PM
What I wonder about is if Dalton would have played Bond in CR as a fully formed character or would he have grown into the character like Craig did as the movie went along. I guess it would depend on if he uses a script closer to the book or the screen version.
#15
Posted 31 October 2007 - 08:04 PM
I think he might have been able to present the most chilling performance of any of the Bonds. Certainly moreso than Lazenby, Moore or the grunting Brosnan. We never really saw Connery's Bond under those conditions, so that's a guess. I think Dalton would have been the best.
#16
Posted 31 October 2007 - 10:16 PM
He would have been different, though: his Bond never had quite the same level of swagger and self confidence/arrogance that Craig's (and most of the others, actually) has, and that self belief was an integral part of CR as we got to see when Bond was wrong to believe in himself so strongly and when he fell from grace.
#17
Posted 01 November 2007 - 01:31 AM
For years I had always thought that Dalton would have been my 1st choice to do Casino Royale. With Dalton, it would have been done differently, not so much the 1st 00 assignment for Bond. Dalton played the "seasoned" 007 close to perfection. In fact I kind of see Bond starting out being like Daniel Craig, becoming Sean Connery during the height of his career and becoming Dalton as he gets older and a little more resposible, toward the end of his career as a field agent.
I don't know about that. Connery's Bond - even at the height of the Bond mania - never seemed like Dalton or Craig's to me.