With the problems in The Netherlands with Die Another day,HP2 and LOTR 2.
Reat this:
Dutch Bond fans are extremely pissed off!!!!
I wil see in Europe The release of bond 21 on
23 December 2004 or 01 or 08 December 2005
Why not urleyer in 2004
Missionimpossible 3 (I think July 2004)
Spiderman 2 ( I think Augustus or September 2004 release)
Shrek 2 (I think October 2004)
Rush hour 3 (I think October or November 2004)
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (i think the same problem as now with DAD,the 25 of november 2004)
The Release of Bond 21 in Europe (The Netherlands)
Started by
M_Balje
, Aug 16 2002 10:00 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 16 August 2002 - 10:00 AM
#2
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:45 PM
I agree. If EON are planning a 007 in (2)007, then rather than have to wait until 2005, they could have a summer 2004 release.
It would be better for them (financially summer films tend to earn more), and we'd be better off by not having to wait another tedious 3 years.
It would be better for them (financially summer films tend to earn more), and we'd be better off by not having to wait another tedious 3 years.
#3
Posted 02 September 2002 - 12:40 PM
Why not make it best of both worlds and have a summer 2005 release, tehn they have enough time for a decent script, and can return to summer releases.
Also, we don't have to wait as long as we have had to for DAD.
On the other hand, have a Dec 2004 release, and a summer 2007 release. That's better.
Also, we don't have to wait as long as we have had to for DAD.
On the other hand, have a Dec 2004 release, and a summer 2007 release. That's better.
#4
Posted 02 September 2002 - 09:15 PM
Originally posted by mkkbb
Why not make it best of both worlds and have a summer 2005 release, tehn they have enough time for a decent script, and can return to summer releases.
Also, we don't have to wait as long as we have had to for DAD.
On the other hand, have a Dec 2004 release, and a summer 2007 release. That's better.
Why not in the summer of 2005:
People go on Holiday
2004: Alone on 23 December 2004 in europe,youno why !
#5
Posted 03 September 2002 - 03:49 PM
I disagree that we should have a Bond film in 2005 and 2007. I think it should be 2004 and 2007. Apart from it being sooner and not having to wait another 3 years, it also means Brosnan will be able to do a fifth and still look younger. In some of these DAD pictures he does seem to look more and more his age, so by 2005 he may not really ahve it in him to do many more. Also they could have a 3 year break to think of a great script while thinking of a good enough actor to take over Brosnan's Bond in 2007. A new Bond in 2007 [007].
#6
Posted 28 October 2002 - 12:41 AM
yes...nov 2004 for pierce's final appearence because he will look like the 2 or 3 bond girls' FATHER by 2006 shooting....
then...get the publicity going in early 2006 with the introduction of the new bond with advertising for bond 22 blasting off a few days before New Years Eve something to the effect of:
2007 could only belong to one man/one number
and release it around memorial day weekend in late may '07 to kick-off the late spring/early summer blockbuster season
then return to the 2 year gap for summer releases like Moonraker and For Your Eyes Only...ohh the good old days of summers past:D
then...get the publicity going in early 2006 with the introduction of the new bond with advertising for bond 22 blasting off a few days before New Years Eve something to the effect of:
2007 could only belong to one man/one number
and release it around memorial day weekend in late may '07 to kick-off the late spring/early summer blockbuster season
then return to the 2 year gap for summer releases like Moonraker and For Your Eyes Only...ohh the good old days of summers past:D