Thank you Casino Royale for reviving action movies
#1
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:53 PM
I'd like to thank Casino Royale for not just reviving James Bond, but for also reviving the glorious days of badass action films, and with 300 released and Live Free or Die...er...John Rambo coming soon to theatres, looks like testosterones have returned to the cinema.
The time has come for a little bit of testosterone to flow through the veins of man once again. There's nothing wrong with a little shoot em up blood shed when done right.
Britain needs James Bond
America needs John Rambo.
#2
Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:42 PM
#3
Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:47 PM
#4
Posted 25 May 2007 - 06:19 AM
I do agree thought that the Bond Franchise was in big trouble (thought not at the box office).
#5
Posted 26 May 2007 - 04:41 AM
Here's my basic idea: there is a sort of "pantheon" of classic action pieces (original Bonds, Indy, Terminator) which so many modern movies (IE Brosnan Bonds, or anything by Michael Bay) strive to become a part of but don't quite make it. Casino Royale does. That statement might sound unfounded and glib in nature, but it's really just the class of the movie as well.
Casino Royale's success, as I said I believe, is that it proves the old way of making a spy film is still relevant. The SECRET to this success was the clever blend of nostalgia and modern conceptions (which, at best, was a true 50/50 split to me).
Bond 22, pay attention.
#6
Posted 27 May 2007 - 10:07 PM
Edited by blueman, 27 May 2007 - 10:08 PM.
#7
Posted 28 May 2007 - 12:21 AM
What about LTK?Great post. CR was the first Bond thriller since OHMSS, and a welcome return to form IMO.
#8
Posted 28 May 2007 - 06:40 AM
What about LTK?Great post. CR was the first Bond thriller since OHMSS, and a welcome return to form IMO.
Indeed what about LTK?
And thanks to everyone, Babs, Danny, Eva, Paul, Mike and Marty (and Ringo, John, George and Paul while we're at it) for CR. You are wonderful to us, the fans who have been waiting for this type film to return.
#9
Posted 28 May 2007 - 07:21 AM
Sorry, just think LTK was a failed attempt. Nice idea, crappy follow-through.
#10
Posted 04 June 2007 - 12:39 PM
I'm in the minority since I don't think Bond needed reviving. And as for action films, there were 2 Transporter films before CR so, badass action films were still being made.
For what it's worth, I believe Stallone said (on his AICN Q&A) that he felt CASINO ROYALE might spearhead a new wave of quality badass action. And let's focus on that word "quality" - I don't think the TRANSPORTER flicks are exactly in the same league as CR, which was the best-reviewed widely-released film of 2006 and won all sorts of Bafta nominations. CR is clearly so much more than an "action film", badass or otherwise. Personally, I think of it as a drama (that just happens to have a few excellent action scenes) - when I think of CR, the story of Bond's origins and his doomed love affair with Vesper are what spring to mind as the core of it. If someone asked me to "name a quality action film", my off-the-top-of-my-head initial reaction would be to cite the first DIE HARD, or TERMINATOR 2, something like that, not CR.
#11
Posted 04 June 2007 - 01:53 PM
#12
Posted 04 June 2007 - 02:34 PM
#13
Posted 05 June 2007 - 04:14 AM
Great post. CR was the first Bond thriller since OHMSS, and a welcome return to form IMO.
Really? I've always thought that CASINO ROYALE was the first Bond thriller since 1987's THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS . . . and FOR YOUR EYES ONLY before that.
#14
Posted 05 June 2007 - 04:19 AM
And now that Stallone has spoken I think we can consider it the end of the matter.
Stallone is the man!
He should have been Le Chiffre in CR.
Steven Obanno: Do you believe in God, Mr. Le Chiffre?
Le Chiffre: No. I believe in a reasonable growth serum.
It would have been a good show-off contest between the buff bodies of Bond and LC.