New issue of HMSS is out
#1
Posted 01 May 2007 - 02:51 AM
#2
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:02 AM
#3
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:18 AM
http://www.hmss.com/films/survey/
click on the titles on the left and you'll be directed to a page with the mini-reviews. They were written primarily in late 2002 and early 2003. For example, here are the mini-reviews of Goldfinger:
http://www.hmss.com/...survey/03gf.HTM
#4
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:29 AM
#5
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:29 AM
In addition to the Casino Royale reviews, there are also mini-reviews of all the earlier movies:
http://www.hmss.com/films/survey/
click on the titles on the left and you'll be directed to a page with the mini-reviews. They were written primarily in late 2002 and early 2003. For example, here are the mini-reviews of Goldfinger:
http://www.hmss.com/...survey/03gf.HTM
Glad to see it up and running. Even though I get tired of seeing my beloved Moonraker picked on.It's my first Bond film in the cinema so I could never hate it. In many ways I prefer to the vastly similar The Spy Who Loved Me though I freely admit it may have been because I saw MR first of those two. Do like Dean Kilbride's defense of it. At least, AVTAK is rightly listed as worst and I am glad to see TLD ranking higher than all the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s Bond films including the overrated FYEO. I agree with you all that TLD and CR are the 2 best Bond films made post-OHMSS.
#6
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:58 AM
#7
Posted 01 May 2007 - 04:01 AM
#8
Posted 01 May 2007 - 08:19 AM
Still, since this thread isn't really a "Member review", I'm moving it to the general CR section.
#9
Posted 01 May 2007 - 08:35 AM
Excellent! Great interview with Purvis & Wade. So they knew from the start they weren't writing CR for Pierce, eh? Certainly not what they said at the time, but I guess they had to, um, fib. Good boys. Here's another film.
Absolutely. And very interesting to hear from them what Haggis contributed. Seems like Haggis only polished some of the dialogue while most of it was already in there.
#10
Posted 01 May 2007 - 08:40 AM
#11
Posted 01 May 2007 - 10:44 AM
#12
Posted 01 May 2007 - 11:10 AM
Maybe you should check out the CBn Links page.I just found it. Maybe CBn could make a list of sites like this one. I like what I've read so far. Thanks for turning me on!
We aim to please
#13
Posted 01 May 2007 - 11:33 AM
Clearly, Lazenby line "I'll have to find something else to do" meant something different to P & W. : It's pretty clear to me, though.
Just something I thought I'd ponit out.
#14
Posted 01 May 2007 - 12:40 PM
As for the reviews: These guys must be an extreme bunch of Moore-haters if they rate DAD/TWINE above TSWLM.
#15
Posted 01 May 2007 - 12:42 PM
I infer from this interview that the JINX screenplay was very much of a piece, in terms of content and tone, with CASINO ROYALE and BOND 22, and that "unseen" Fleming characters like Sir James Moloney and Ronnie Vallance may appear in the upcoming films. If BOND 22 will be, in some ways, the Fleming's YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE to CASINO ROYALE's ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE, it has an obvious role for Sir James.
#16
Posted 01 May 2007 - 01:35 PM
#17
Posted 01 May 2007 - 02:07 PM
The survey was a nice inclusion. Thought they went a little hard on old LALD, but oh well. Their guest reviewer, Vern (whom I'd seen numerous times on AICN), was pretty funny in his "outsider's" take on TB and GE. LMAO at the accuracy of his comment on Russian names in movies. He's 100% on the money with that.
The M:I article was interesting, IMO, and all the other goods made it a great issue all around.
#18
Posted 01 May 2007 - 04:38 PM
#19
Posted 01 May 2007 - 04:56 PM
#20
Posted 01 May 2007 - 06:02 PM
#21
Posted 01 May 2007 - 06:13 PM
And great to see this site again.
#22
Posted 01 May 2007 - 06:35 PM
The Neal Purvis & Robert Wade interview shows those guys know their Fleming, their Bond and also shows us how much control they really have. The Jinx insight was fascinating - I think we'll see a lot of that in the next films as well as shards of unused Fleming. A great interview.
Double Tap ( ) to Tom Zielinski and Paul Baack and the rest of the HMSS team. It's good to have some James Bond Journalism out there. The Fanalysis was amusingly anal
#23
Posted 02 May 2007 - 12:32 AM
Jinx looks to have been a massive missed opportunity
Finally! Someone else who thinks this!
I think this is an historic moment: the first ever piece of news about the content of the JINX script. Not that "a fairly down-to-earth espionage picture" tells us all that much (although it indicates that the screenplay was, staggeringly enough, closer to that of CASINO ROYALE than to that of DIE ANOTHER DAY), but it's a veritable torrent of information compared to the previous total silence from all quarters (even from the uninformed rumour mongerers of fandom).
Considering how close the completed JINX script came to being filmed (with Stephen Frears directing, which suggests a perhaps surprising level of quality about the project), and considering how voracious us Bond fans are for info, it's odd that next to no details have been unearthed about this enterprise, this effective lost Bond film sans Bond.
#24
Posted 02 May 2007 - 02:08 AM
It's great to have an explanation of why they re-booted, a concrete explanation that CASINO ROYALE's M is a different character than the M in GOLDENEYE.
Also interesting to note that there seems to be some dissatisfaction with DIE ANOTHER DAY, that in the end, it wasn't the film P&W intended: "The first we thought was great - but still veering close to comic book-like. In the second half the comic book took over."
#25
Posted 02 May 2007 - 02:19 AM
Also interesting to note that there seems to be some dissatisfaction with DIE ANOTHER DAY, that in the end, it wasn't the film P&W intended: "The first we thought was great - but still veering close to comic book-like. In the second half the comic book took over."
Agree with P & W there. I thought up to about the time of the action sequence where Miranda is revealed as the traitor, DAD was the most entertaining Brosnan Bond film then it turned into a videogame. TND was probably better on the whole since it didn't decend into CGI in its final 1/3 but DAD did feature a little more spying and international intrigue in addition to the action and a tougher, less-PC more hagard performance as Bond from Brosnan which I liked.
#26
Posted 02 May 2007 - 03:09 AM
Fascinating that the JINX script was down-to-earth, in the veing of CASINO ROYALE: "It was an attitude that began with the Jinx script and we have continued through CR to this new one. We're close to finishing the script. Very close." Suddenly it makes a little more sense that Frears was involved with JINX.
Agreed. After Die Another Day, down-to-earth was certainly not the first word I was tagging to the Jinx project.
Great interview.
#27
Posted 02 May 2007 - 10:36 AM
As for the Jinx-script. Can anyone see Halle Berry's character Jinx in a serious spy-film? I can't.
"World peace, unconditional love, and our little friend with the expensive acne."
#28
Posted 02 May 2007 - 10:49 AM
Jinx looks to have been a massive missed opportunity
Finally! Someone else who thinks this!
No. I have always thought that it was a missed opportunity.
#29
Posted 02 May 2007 - 11:20 AM
Maybe you should check out the CBn Links page.I just found it. Maybe CBn could make a list of sites like this one. I like what I've read so far. Thanks for turning me on!
We aim to please
Thanks Stromberg.
#30
Posted 04 May 2007 - 03:19 PM