
Anyone willing to give me a summary of "Icebreaker?"
#1
Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:28 PM
#4
Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:34 PM
Dead
Snow
Nazis
Madiera
Traitor
Snowplough
Ooh
Boom
Another traitor
More snow
More Nazis
Not a traitor after all
Yet more snow
Ice palace
Hang on - is he a traitor too?
Boom boom
Umm...
Don't understand it
Head hurts
Probably some more Nazis
Might as well have another traitor
Which we do
Or do we?
Snoggage.
#5
Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:47 PM
I loved this book and I wanted it to be 1991's 3rd Dalton film.
#6
Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:59 PM

(Yes, TC, one of the great torture ideas/scenes.)
#7
Posted 13 April 2007 - 09:52 PM
Although Jim's post above also provides an interesting look at its plot.

#8
Posted 14 April 2007 - 02:43 AM


#9
Posted 18 June 2007 - 12:19 AM
Not bad at all...so far.
#10
Posted 11 April 2008 - 12:05 PM
Commies
Dead
Snow
Nazis
Madiera
Traitor
Snowplough
Ooh
Boom
Another traitor
More snow
More Nazis
Not a traitor after all
Yet more snow
Ice palace
Hang on - is he a traitor too?
Boom boom
Umm...
Don't understand it
Head hurts
Probably some more Nazis
Might as well have another traitor
Which we do
Or do we?
Snoggage.

#11
Posted 08 January 2010 - 03:25 PM
Shame, because on the whole, I though Icebreaker was quite good.
Edited by DavidJones, 08 January 2010 - 03:25 PM.
#12
Posted 08 January 2010 - 07:21 PM
I found this story and its structure reminiscent of the best of Alistair MacLean (Where Eagles Dare, for example - not the treatments fleshed out by Alistair MacNeil) and a great change of pace from the usual formula.
High Time to Kill (aka A Better Way to Die) had a similar structure, which made it (IMCO) the second best of Benson's canon. There's nothing like curling up in front of a crackling fire with a cup of hot cocao and reading about - or watching - someone else freeze his cojones off.
By all means, read Icebreaker and enjoy.
#13
Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:52 PM
#14
Posted 01 April 2011 - 12:10 AM
Although I did get a bit confused at the age of 12 reading it with all the double-cross/counter-cross goings on, it's said that it's no good if you fully understand a book.
I'm looking forward to reeading this one again.
Edited by Perry, 01 April 2011 - 12:14 AM.
#15
Posted 01 April 2011 - 07:45 AM
Commies
Dead
Snow
Nazis
Airports
Hotel rooms
Madiera
Airports
Hotel rooms
Traitor
Snowplough
Hotel rooms
Ooh
Hotel rooms
Boom
Another traitor
Hotel rooms
More snow
More Nazis
Not a traitor after all
Yet more snow
Ice palace
Hang on - is he a traitor too?
Boom boom
Umm...
Don't understand it
Head hurts
Probably some more Nazis
Might as well have another traitor
Which we do
Or do we?
Hotel rooms
Airports
Snoggage
Edited by Jim, 01 April 2011 - 07:46 AM.
Edited due to insufficient hotel rooms
#16
Posted 01 April 2011 - 12:06 PM
That post made me laugh out loud Jim, marvelous. You can tell it’s a Friday.

#17
Posted 01 April 2011 - 04:12 PM
The snowplough scene on the snowed in side road was really thrilling, I'm glad people keep mentioning it. Loved the villain's ice fortress and Bond crossing empty open expanses of ice to get to safety when a gun could ring out from the treeline any moment. Lots of nail biting.
#18
Posted 01 April 2011 - 04:40 PM
#19
Posted 04 April 2011 - 08:00 AM
While IB on closer inspection has some tremendous logic issues - and which of the Bonds, film and book, wouldn't have them? which thriller at all? - it's a perfect example of Gardner at the top of his Bond writing. The carefully measured action, the unusual setting and theme as well as the whole pace of the book all add up to one of the best reads in Bond IMO.
!POSSIBLE SPOILERS!
Perhaps often overlooked here: Gardner once more picks up on an original Fleming idea and gives it its own spin. Somewhere in his notes Fleming wrote down a situation where Bond must kill a fellow agent to remain under cover. Fleming apparently later changed this to the fate of Campbell in OHMSS, where Bond merely wished, Campbell had a death pill. In IB Bond is tortured by the CIA agent Tirpiz, who apparently was one of Gloda's men from the start.
Now we of course know as much as Bond, to us Tirpiz is either a traitor or some nazi who killed the real Tirpiz.
But what about Tirpiz?
If we think for a moment about it, Tirpiz can't be sure Bond isn't aware he's really working for the CIA. Later we learn that M was in on the ruse from the start, and supposedly Tirpiz was aware of this. So he would have no guarantee that M didn't fill in Bond on the details of the Icebreaker team, his own tripple play included. For Tirpiz the only safe solution would have been to keep Bond under water long enough to kill him and put the blame on the minions afterwards.
But then again that would have been a Brad Tirpiz adventure from the CIA blackops files.
#20
Posted 21 July 2011 - 03:20 PM